SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Bishop, J.M. (1982). Oncogenes. Scientific American, 246, 6878.
  • Carey, S. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R.N. Giere (Ed.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science: Vol. 15: Cognitive models of science. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
  • Cheng, P.W., & Holyoak, K.J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 391416.
  • Dunbar, K. (1992, November). Evidence evaluation and planning heuristics in molecular biology laboratories. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Judgement and Decision Making Society, St. Louis , MO .
  • Einhorn, H.J., & Hogarth, R.J. (1986). Judging probable cause. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 319.
  • Ericsson, K.A. (1975). Instruction to verbalize as a means to study problem-solving processes with the Eight puzzle: A preliminary study (Tech. Rep. No. 458). Stockholm : University of Stockholm, Department of Psychology.
  • Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge , MA : Cambridge University Press.
  • Gooding, D. (1992). The procedural turn. In R.N. Giere (Ed.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science: Vol. 15. Cognitive models of science. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
  • Gorman, M.E. (1986). How the possibility of error affects falsification on a task that models scientific problem solving. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 8596.
    Direct Link:
  • Hall, A. (1990). Ras and GAP—Who's controlling whom? Cell, 61, 921923.
  • Holland, J., Holyoak, K., Nisbett, R.E., & Thagard, P. (1986). Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Holmes, L. (1985). Lavoisier and the chemistry of life: An exploration of scientific creativity. Madison : University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Holyoak, K.J., & Thagard, P.J. (1989). A computational model of analogical problem solving. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge , MA : Cambridge University Press.
  • Jacob, F. (1988). The statue within. New York : Basic Books.
  • Jacob, F., & Monod, J. (1961). Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology, 3, 318356.
  • Judson, H.F. (1979). The eighth day of creation. New York : Simon & Shuster.
  • Kaplan, C., & Simon, H.A. (1990). In search of insight. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 374419.
  • Kern, L.H. (1983). The effect of data error in inducing confirmatory inference strategies in scientific hypotheses testing. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for the Social Studies of Science, Blacksburg , VA .
  • Kirk, R.E. (1968). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont , CA : Brooks/Cole.
  • Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12, 148.
  • Klahr, D., Dunbar, K., & Fay, A.L. (1989). Designing good experiments to test bad hypotheses. In J. Shrager & P. Langley (Eds.), Computational models of discovery and theory formation. San Francisco , CA : Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Klayman, J., & Ha, Y. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211228.
  • Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
  • Kulkarni, D., & Simon, H.A. (1988). The processes of scientific discovery: The strategy of experimentation. Cognitive Science, 12, 139176.
  • Langley, P., Simon, H.A., Bradshaw, G.L., & Zytkow, J.M. (1987). Scientific discovery: Computational explorations of the creative process. Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Mynatt, C.R., Doherty, M.E., & Tweney, R.D. (1977). Confirmation bias in a simulated research environment: An experimental study of scientific inference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 8595.
  • Mynatt, C.R., Doherty, M.E., & Tweney, R.D. (1978). Consequences of confirmation and disconfirmation in a simulated research environment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 395406.
  • Nersessian, N. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R.N. Giere (Ed.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science: Vol. 15. Cognitive models of science. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
  • Novick, L.R., & Holyoak, K.J. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 398415.
  • Qin, Y., & Simon, H.A. (1990). Laboratory replication of scientific discovery processes. Cognitive Science, 14, 281312.
  • Sherwood, B.A., & Sherwood, J.N. (1988). The cT Language. Champaign , IL : Stipes Publishing.
  • Shrager, J.,& Langley, P. (Eds.). (1990). Computational models of discovery and theory formation. San Francisco , CA : Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Simon, H.A., & Lea, G. (1974). Problem solving and rule induction: A unified view. In L.W. Gregg (Ed.), Knowledge and cognition. Hillsdale , NJ : Erlbaum.
  • Tweney, R.D. (1985). Faraday's discovery of induction: A cognitive approach. In D. Gooding & F. James (Eds.), Faraday rediscovered. New York : Stockton Press.
  • Tweney, R.D., Doherty, M.E., & Mynatt, C.R., (Eds.), (1981). On scientific thinking: A reader in the cognitive psychology of science. New York : Columbia University Press.
  • Wason, P.C. (1968). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses—A second look. In P.C. Wason & P.N. Johnson-Laird (Eds.), Thinking and reasoning. Harmondsworth , England : Penguin.
  • Watson, J.D., Hopkins, N.H., Roberts, J.W., Steitz, J.A., & Weiner, A.M. (1989). Molecular biology of the gene (4th ed.). Menlo Park , CA : Benjamin/Cummings.