SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, J. A., Mozer, M. C. (1981). Categorization and selective neurons. In G. Hinton & J. Anderson (Eds.), Parallel models of associative memory (pp. 213236). Hillsdale , NJ : Erlbaum.
  • Andruski, J. E., Blumstein, S. E., & Burton, M. (1994). The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access. Cognition, 52, 163187.
  • Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia : Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Brent, M. R., & Cartwright, T. A. (1996). Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation. Cognition, 61, 93125.
  • Burgess, C., & Lund, K. (1997). Modeling parsing constraints with high-dimensional context space. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 177210.
  • Cairns, P., Shillcock, R., Chater, N., & Levy, J. (1997). Bootstrapping word boundaries: a bottom-up corpus based approach to speech segmentation. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 111153.
  • Christiansen, M. H. & Chater, N. (this issue). Connectionist natural language processing: The state of the art. Cognitive Science.
  • Clark, A. (1993). Associative engines: Connectionism, context and representational change. Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Clouse, D. S., & Cottrell, G. W. (1996). Discrete multi-dimensional scaling. In G. W. Cottrell (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 284289). Mahwah , NJ : Erlbaum.
  • Elman, J. L. (1991). Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure. Machine Learning, 7, 195225.
  • Gaskell, M. G. (1996). Parallel activation of distributed concepts: who put the P in the PDP? In G. W. Cottrell (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 284289). Mahwah , NJ : Erlbaum.
  • Gaskell, M. G., Hare, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1995). A connectionist model of phonological representation in speech perception. Cognitive Science, 19, 407439.
  • Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1996). Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 144158.
  • Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1997-a). Discriminating local and distributed models of competition in spoken word recognition. In M. G. Shafto & P. Langley (Eds.), Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 247252). Mahwah , NJ : Erlbaum.
  • Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1997-b). Integrating form and meaning: a distributed model of speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 613656.
  • Gaskell, M.G., & Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1998). Mechanisms of phonological inference in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 24, 380396.
  • Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1999). Representation and competition in the perception of spoken words. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York : Wiley.
  • Hinton:G. E., & Shallice, T. (1991). Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia. Psychological Review, 98(1), 7495.
  • Kawamoto, A. H. (1993). Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: a parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 474516.
  • Kawamoto, A. H., Farrar, W. T., & Kello, C. (1994). When two meanings are better than one: Modeling the ambiguity advantage using a recurrent distributed network. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 12331247.
  • Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: the latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211240.
  • Levy, J. P., Bullinaria, J. A., & Patel, M. (1997). The evaluation of the use of co-occurrence statistics. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Computational Psycholinguistics. University of California at Berkeley, CA , July.
  • Lund, K., Burgess, C., & Atchley, R. A. (1995). Semantic and associative priming in high-dimensional semantic space. In J. D. Moore & J. F. Lehman (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 660665). Mahwah , NJ : Erlbaum.
  • Marslen-Wilson, W., & Warren, P. (1994). Levels of representation and process in lexical access. Psychological Review, 101(4), 653675.
  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71102.
  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1990). Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 148172). Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 2963.
  • Masson, M. E. J. (1995). A distributed memory model of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21(1), 323.
  • McClelland, J.L., & Elman, J.L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 186.
  • McRae, K., de Sa, V., & Seidenberg, M. (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 99130.
  • Morton, J. (1969). The interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165178.
  • Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189234.
  • Plaut, D. C. (1997). Structure and function in the lexical system: Insights from distributed models of word reading and lexical decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 765805.
  • Plaut, D. C. (1995). Semantic and associative priming in a distributed attractor network. In J. D. Moore & J. F. Lehman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3742). Mahwah , NJ : Erlbaum.
  • Plaut, D. C., & Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: a case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 377500.
  • Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month old infants. Science, 274(5294), 19261928.
  • Smolensky, P. (1986). Neural and conceptual interpretation of PDP models. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 2: Psychological and biological models (pp. 390431). Cambridge , MA : MIT Press/Bradford Books.
  • Zwitserlood, P. (1989). The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition, 32, 2564.
  • Zwitserlood, P., & Schriefers, H. (1995). Effects of sensory information and processing time in spoken-word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 121136.