SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press.
  • Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Anderson, J. R., Matessa, M., & Lebiere, C. (1997). ACT-R: A theory of higher-level cognition and its relation to visual attention. Human Computer Interaction, 12, 439462.
  • Antell, S. E., & Keating, D. P. (1983). Perception of numerical invariance in neonates. Child Development, 54, 695701.
  • Chi, M., & Klahr, D. (1975). Span and rate of apprehension in children & adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 19, 434439.
  • Frick, R. W. (1987). The homogeneity effect in counting. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 816.
  • Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child's understanding of number. Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press.
  • Jevons, W. S. (1871). The power of numerical discrimination. Nature, 3, 4464.
  • Kaufman, E., Lord, M., Reese, T., & Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. American Journal of Psychology, 62, 498525.
  • Klahr, D., & Wallace, J. G. (1976). Cognitive Development: An Information Processing View. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Logan, G.D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492527.
  • Mandler, G., & Shebo, B. (1982). Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 122.
  • McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2). Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press.
  • Peterson, S., Morton, K., & Simon, T. J. (1997). Modeling a functional explanation of the subitizing limit. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In D. E. Rumelhart, & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 318362). Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Shrager, J., Klahr, D., & Chase, W. (1982). Segmentation and quantification of random dot patterns. Paper presented at the 23rd annual meeting of the Psychonomics Society.
  • Siegler, R. S. (1986). Unities in strategy choices across domains. In M. Perlmutter (Ed.), Minnesota symposium on child development (Vol 19). Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Siegler, R. S., & Robinson, M. (1982). The development of numerical understandings. In H. W. Reese, & L. P. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior. New York : Academic Press.
  • Siegler, R. S., & Shrager, J. (1984). Strategy choices in addition and subtraction: How do children know what to do? In C. Sophian (Ed.), Origins of cognitive skills. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Siegler, R. S., & Shipley, C. (1995). Variation, selection, and cognitive change. In T. J. Simon & G. S. Halford (Eds.), Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Simon, T., Cabrera, A., & Kliegl, R. (1993). A new approach to the study of subitizing as distinct enumeration processing. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Simon, T. J., Peterson, S., Patel, G., & Sathian, K. (1998). Do the magnocellular and parvocellular visual pathways contribute differentially to subitizing and counting? Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 451464.
  • Starkey, P., & Cooper, R. S. (1980). Perception of numbers by human infants. Science, 210, 10331035.
  • Svenson, O., & Sjoberg, K. (1983). Speeds of subitizing and counting processes in different age groups. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 142, 203211.
  • Trick, L., & Pylyshyn, Z. (1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 331351.
  • Trick, L., & Pylyshyn, Z. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80102.
  • van Oeffelen, M. P., & Vos, P. G. (1982). Configural effects on the enumeration of dots: Counting by groups. Memory and Cognition, 10, 396404.
  • Wolters, G., van Kempen, H., & Wijlhuizen, G. (1987). Quantification of small numbers of dots: Subitizing or pattern recognition? American Journal of Psychology, 100, 225237.
  • Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention. Washington , DC : American Psychological Association.
  • Zipser, D., & Anderson, R. A. (1988). A back-propagation programmed network that simulates response properties of a subset of posterior parietal neurons. Nature, 331, 679684.