You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article

Computational Evidence for the Subitizing Phenomenon as an Emergent Property of the Human Cognitive Architecture

  1. Scott A. Peterson1,*,
  2. Tony J. Simon2

Article first published online: 11 FEB 2010

DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog2401_3

Issue

Cognitive Science

Cognitive Science

Volume 24, Issue 1, pages 93–122, March 2000

Additional Information

How to Cite

Peterson, S. A. and Simon, T. J. (2000), Computational Evidence for the Subitizing Phenomenon as an Emergent Property of the Human Cognitive Architecture. Cognitive Science, 24: 93–122. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2401_3

Author Information

  1. 1

    Cameron University

  2. 2

    Georgia Institute of Technology

* Department of Psychology and Human Ecology, Cameron University, 2800 West Gore Blvd., Lawton, OK 73505; E-Mail: scottp@cameron.edu

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 11 FEB 2010
  2. Article first published online: 11 FEB 2010

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

Get PDF (469K)

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press.
  • Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Anderson, J. R., Matessa, M., & Lebiere, C. (1997). ACT-R: A theory of higher-level cognition and its relation to visual attention. Human Computer Interaction, 12, 439–462.
  • Antell, S. E., & Keating, D. P. (1983). Perception of numerical invariance in neonates. Child Development, 54, 695–701.
  • Chi, M., & Klahr, D. (1975). Span and rate of apprehension in children & adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 19, 434–439.
  • Frick, R. W. (1987). The homogeneity effect in counting. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 8–16.
  • Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child's understanding of number. Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press.
  • Jevons, W. S. (1871). The power of numerical discrimination. Nature, 3, 44–64.
  • Kaufman, E., Lord, M., Reese, T., & Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. American Journal of Psychology, 62, 498–525.
  • Klahr, D., & Wallace, J. G. (1976). Cognitive Development: An Information Processing View. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Logan, G.D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.
  • Mandler, G., & Shebo, B. (1982). Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 1–22.
  • McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2). Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press.
  • Peterson, S., Morton, K., & Simon, T. J. (1997). Modeling a functional explanation of the subitizing limit. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In D. E. Rumelhart, & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 318–362). Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Shrager, J., Klahr, D., & Chase, W. (1982). Segmentation and quantification of random dot patterns. Paper presented at the 23rd annual meeting of the Psychonomics Society.
  • Siegler, R. S. (1986). Unities in strategy choices across domains. In M. Perlmutter (Ed.), Minnesota symposium on child development (Vol 19). Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Siegler, R. S., & Robinson, M. (1982). The development of numerical understandings. In H. W. Reese, & L. P. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior. New York : Academic Press.
  • Siegler, R. S., & Shrager, J. (1984). Strategy choices in addition and subtraction: How do children know what to do? In C. Sophian (Ed.), Origins of cognitive skills. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Siegler, R. S., & Shipley, C. (1995). Variation, selection, and cognitive change. In T. J. Simon & G. S. Halford (Eds.), Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Simon, T., Cabrera, A., & Kliegl, R. (1993). A new approach to the study of subitizing as distinct enumeration processing. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Simon, T. J., Peterson, S., Patel, G., & Sathian, K. (1998). Do the magnocellular and parvocellular visual pathways contribute differentially to subitizing and counting? Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 451–464.
  • Starkey, P., & Cooper, R. S. (1980). Perception of numbers by human infants. Science, 210, 1033–1035.
  • Svenson, O., & Sjoberg, K. (1983). Speeds of subitizing and counting processes in different age groups. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 142, 203–211.
  • Trick, L., & Pylyshyn, Z. (1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 331–351.
  • Trick, L., & Pylyshyn, Z. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80–102.
  • van Oeffelen, M. P., & Vos, P. G. (1982). Configural effects on the enumeration of dots: Counting by groups. Memory and Cognition, 10, 396–404.
  • Wolters, G., van Kempen, H., & Wijlhuizen, G. (1987). Quantification of small numbers of dots: Subitizing or pattern recognition? American Journal of Psychology, 100, 225–237.
  • Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention. Washington , DC : American Psychological Association.
  • Zipser, D., & Anderson, R. A. (1988). A back-propagation programmed network that simulates response properties of a subset of posterior parietal neurons. Nature, 331, 679–684.
Get PDF (469K)