SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Paul Deane, Yi Song, A case study in principled assessment design: Designing assessments to measure and support the development of argumentative reading and writing skills, Psicología Educativa, 2014, 20, 2, 99

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Ya-Ting Chen, Yung-Hsin Chou, John Cowan, Concentrating on affective feedforward in online tutoring, British Journal of Educational Technology, 2014, 45, 4
  3. 3
    William A. Sandoval, Beate Sodian, Susanne Koerber, Jacqueline Wong, Developing Children's Early Competencies to Engage With Science, Educational Psychologist, 2014, 49, 2, 139

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Panos Vlachopoulos, John Cowan, Online Tutor 2.0, 2014,

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Barbara Koslowski, Joseph Marasia, Francoise Vermeylen, Victoria Hendrix, A Disconfirming Strategy Is Not Necessarily Better Than a Confirming Strategy, The American Journal of Psychology, 2013, 126, 3, 335

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Maria Evagorou, Jonathan Osborne, Exploring young students' collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 2
  7. 7
    Adam Corner, Ulrike Hahn, Normative theories of argumentation: are some norms better than others?, Synthese, 2013, 190, 16, 3579

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Douglas Clark, Pratim Sengupta, Approaches and Strategies in Next Generation Science Learning, 2013,

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Eva Thomm, Rainer Bromme, “It should at least seem scientific!” Textual features of “scientificness” and their impact on lay assessments of online information, Science Education, 2012, 96, 2
  10. 10
    Alina Reznitskaya, Monica Glina, Brian Carolan, Olivier Michaud, Jon Rogers, Lavina Sequeira, Examining transfer effects from dialogic discussions to new tasks and contexts, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2012, 37, 4, 288

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    IGOR DOUVEN, Learning Conditional Information, Mind & Language, 2012, 27, 3
  12. 12
    Hugo Mercier, Looking for Arguments, Argumentation, 2012, 26, 3, 305

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Bénédicte Bes, Steven Sloman, Christopher G. Lucas, Éric Raufaste, Non-Bayesian Inference: Causal Structure Trumps Correlation, Cognitive Science, 2012, 36, 7
  14. 14
    Ana Cazares Castillo, Promoting Argumentative Abilities in Written Composition of Psychology Senior Students: CAAM Method, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 69, 1664

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Deanna Kuhn, The development of causal reasoning, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2012, 3, 3
  16. 16
    Lisa Scharrer, Rainer Bromme, M. Anne Britt, Marc Stadtler, The seduction of easiness: How science depictions influence laypeople’s reliance on their own evaluation of scientific information, Learning and Instruction, 2012, 22, 3, 231

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Victor Sampson, Jonathon Grooms, Joi Phelps Walker, Argument-Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study, Science Education, 2011, 95, 2
  18. 18
    Bree Chancellor, Anjan Chatterjee, Brain Branding: When Neuroscience and Commerce Collide, AJOB Neuroscience, 2011, 2, 4, 18

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Jingyan Lu, Ming Ming Chiu, Nancy WaiYing Law, Collaborative argumentation and justifications: A statistical discourse analysis of online discussions, Computers in Human Behavior, 2011, 27, 2, 946

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    William A. Sandoval, Aylin Çam, Elementary children's judgments of the epistemic status of sources of justification, Science Education, 2011, 95, 3
  21. 21
    Michael Weinstock, Knowledge-telling and knowledge-transforming arguments in mock jurors' verdict justifications, Thinking & Reasoning, 2011, 17, 3, 282

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Shu-Sheng Lin, Joel J. Mintzes, LEARNING ARGUMENTATION SKILLS THROUGH INSTRUCTION IN SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES: THE EFFECT OF ABILITY LEVEL, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2010, 8, 6, 993

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Keiichi Kobayashi, Strategic Use of Multiple Texts for the Evaluation of Arguments, Reading Psychology, 2010, 31, 2, 121

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Deanna Kuhn, Teaching and learning science as argument, Science Education, 2010, 94, 5
  25. 25
    Jingjing Qin, Erkan Karabacak, The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing, System, 2010, 38, 3, 444

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Deanna Kuhn, Jared Katz, Are self-explanations always beneficial?, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2009, 103, 3, 386

    CrossRef

  27. You have free access to this content27
    Paul Deane, Nora Odendahl, Thomas Quinlan, Mary Fowles, Cyndi Welsh, Jennifer Bivens-Tatum, COGNITIVE MODELS OF WRITING: WRITING PROFICIENCY AS A COMPLEX INTEGRATED SKILL, ETS Research Report Series, 2008, 2008, 2
  28. 28
    Barbara Koslowski, Joseph Marasia, Melanie Chelenza, Randi Dublin, Information becomes evidence when an explanation can incorporate it into a causal framework, Cognitive Development, 2008, 23, 4, 472

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    Debra A. Hagler, Sarah K. Brem, Reaching agreement: The structure & pragmatics of critical care nurses’ informal argument, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2008, 33, 3, 403

    CrossRef

  30. 30
    Maria Evagorou, Lucy Avraamidou, Technology in support of argument construction in school science, Educational Media International, 2008, 45, 1, 33

    CrossRef

  31. 31
    Ilana Seidel Horn, Fast Kids, Slow Kids, Lazy Kids: Framing the Mismatch Problem in Mathematics Teachers' Conversations, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2007, 16, 1, 37

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    Ilana Seidel Horn, Fast Kids, Slow Kids, Lazy Kids: Framing the Mismatch Problem in Mathematics Teachers� Conversations, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2007, 16, 1, 37

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    Lucia Mason, Fabio Scirica, Prediction of students' argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding, Learning and Instruction, 2006, 16, 5, 492

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    Yair Neuman, Michael P. Weinstock, Amnon Glasner, The effect of contextual factors on the judgement of informal reasoning fallacies, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2006, 59, 2, 411

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    Tania Lombrozo, The structure and function of explanations, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2006, 10, 10, 464

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    Jeffrey Loewenstein, Michael W. Morris, Agnish Chakravarti, Leigh Thompson, Shirli Kopelman, At a loss for words: Dominating the conversation and the outcome in negotiation as a function of intricate arguments and communication media, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2005, 98, 1, 28

    CrossRef

  37. 37
    Amnon Glassner, Michael Weinstock, Yair Neuman, Pupils' evaluation and generation of evidence and explanation in argumentation, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2005, 75, 1
  38. 38
    Deanna Kuhn, Jared B Katz, David Dean, Jr, : Developing reason, Thinking & Reasoning, 2004, 10, 2, 197

    CrossRef

  39. 39
    Sarah K. Brem, Structure and pragmatics in informal argument: circularity and question-begging, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2003, 7, 4, 147

    CrossRef

  40. 40
    Lance J. Rips, Circular reasoning, Cognitive Science, 2002, 26, 6
  41. 41
    Deanna Kuhn, Adolescent Thinking, Handbook of Adolescent Psychology,