SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ahn, W., & Bailenson, J. (1996). Causal attribution as a search for underlying mechanism: an explanation of the conjunction fallacy and the discounting principle. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 82123.
  • Ahn, W., Kalish, C. W., Medin, D. L., & Gelman, S. A. (1995). The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution. Cognition, 54, 299352.
  • Anderson, J. R., & Sheu, C-F. (1995). Causal inferences as perceptual judgments. Memory & Cognition, 23, 510524.
  • Bell, V., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1998). A model theory of modal reasoning. Cognitive Science, 22, 2551.
  • Beyth-Marom, R. (1982). Perception of correlation reexamined. Memory & Cognition, 10, 511519.
  • Braine, M. D. S., & O'Brien, D.P. (Eds.). (1998). Mental Logic. Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Bucciarelli, M., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1999). Strategies in syllogistic reasoning. Cognitive Science, 23, 247303.
  • Bullock, M., Gelman, R., & Baillargeon, R. (1982). The development of causal reasoning. In Friedman, W.J. (Ed.) The Developmental Psychology of Time. pp. 209254. Orlando , FL : Academic Press.
  • Burks, A. (1951). The logic of causal propositions. Mind, LX, 363382.
  • Byrne, R. M. J. (1997). Cognitive processes in counterfactual thinking about what might have been. In Medin, D.K. (Ed.) The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory, Vol. 37 (pp. 105154). San Diego , CA : Academic Press.
  • Byrne, R. M. J., & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1989). Spatial reasoning. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 564575.
  • Byrne, R. M. J., & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1992). The spontaneous use of propositional connectives. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 89110.
  • Carnap, R. (1966). Philosophical Foundations of Physics. New York : Basic Books.
  • Cheng, P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: a causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104, 367405.
  • Cheng, P. W., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Oliver, L. M. (1986). Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 293328.
  • Cheng, P. W., & Nisbett, R. E. (1993). Pragmatic constraints on causal deduction. In Nisbett, R.E. (Ed.) Rules for reasoning. (pp. 207227). Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1990). A probabilistic contrast model of causal induction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 545567.
  • Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1991). Causes versus enabling conditions. Cognition, 40, 83120.
  • Clark, H. H., & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language: an introduction to psycholinguistics. New York : Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Cummins, D. D. (1995). Naive theories and causal deduction. Memory & Cognition, 23, 646658.
  • Cummins, D. D. (1998). The pragmatics of causal inference. Proceedings of the twentieth annual conference of the cognitive science society (p. 9).
  • Cummins, D. D., Lubart, T., Alksnis, O., & Rist, R. (1991). Conditional reasoning and causation. Memory and Cognition, 19, 274282.
  • Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1978). Confidence in judgment: persistence of the illusion of validity. Psychological Review, 85, 395416.
  • Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1986). Judging probable cause. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 319.
  • Fisher, R. A. (1959). Smoking. London : Oliver & Boyd.
  • Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. V. (1996). The mental models theory of language comprehension. In Britton, B.K., & Graesser, A.C. (Eds.) Models of understanding text. (pp. 31339). Hillsdale , NJ : Erlbaum.
  • Geminiani, G. C., Carassa, A., & Bara, B. G. (1996). Causality by contact. In Oakhill, J., & Garnham, A. (Eds.) Mental models in cognitive science. (pp. 275303). Hove , East Sussex : Psychology Press.
  • Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102, 684704.
  • Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1999). Overcoming difficulties in Bayesian reasoning: a reply to Lewis & Keren (1999) and Mellers & McGraw (1999). Psychological Review, 106, 425430.
  • Girotto, V., Legrenzi, P., & Rizzo, A. (1991). Event controllability in counterfactual thinking. Acta Psychologica, 78, 111133.
  • Goldvarg, Y., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2000). Illusions in modal reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 28, 282294.
  • Green, D. W. (2001). Understanding microworlds. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, in press.
  • Green, D. W., & Over, D. E. (2000). Decision theoretic effects in testing a causal conditional. Current Psychology of Cognition, 19, 5168.
  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P., & Morgan, J.L. (Eds.) Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: speech acts. New York : Academic Press.
  • Harre, R., & Madden, E. H. (1975). Causal powers. Oxford : Blackwell.
  • Hart, H. L. A., & Honoré, A. M. (1985). Causation in the law. (2nd ed.) Oxford : Clarendon Press. (First edition published in 1959.).
  • Hesslow, G. (1988). The problem of causal selection. In Hilton, D.J. (Ed.) Contemporary science and natural explanation: commonsense conceptions of causality (pp. 1132). Brighton , Sussex : Harvester Press.
  • Hilton, D. J., & Erb, H-P. (1996). Mental models and causal explanation: judgements of probable cause and explanatory relevance. Thinking & Reasoning, 2, 273308.
  • Hume, D. (1988). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. A. Flew (Ed.) La Salle , IL : Open Court. (Originally published 1748.)
  • Hume, D. (1978). A Treatise on Human Nature. L.A. Selby-Bigge (2nd ed.). Second ed. Oxford : Oxford University Press. (Originally published 1739.)
  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Barres, P. E. (1994). When ‘or’ means ‘and’: a study in mental models. Proceedings of the sixteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society, 475478.
  • Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2001). Conditionals: a theory of their meaning, pragmatics, and role in inference. Under submission.
  • Johnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., Girotto, P., & Legrenzi, M. S. (2000). Illusions in reasoning about consistency. Science, 288, 531532.
  • Johnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., Girotto, P., Legrenzi, M. S., & Caverni, J-P. (1999). Naive probability: a mental model theory of extensional reasoning. Psychological Review, 106, 6288.
  • Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Savary, F. (1999). Illusory inferences: a novel class of erroneous deductions. Cognition, 71, 191229.
  • Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: comparing reality to its alternative. Psychological Review, 93, 7588.
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  • Kant, I. (1934). Critique of pure reason. Translated Meiklejohn, J.M.D. New York : Dutton. (Originally published 1781.)
  • Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107128.
  • Koslowski, B. (1996). Theory and evidence: the development of scientific reasoning. Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). Focussing in reasoning and decision making. Cognition, 49, 3766.
  • Legrenzi, M., Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2001). Reasoning to consistency: a theory of naive nonmonotonic reasoning. Under submission.
  • Legrenzi, P., & Sonino, M. (1994). Psychologistic aspects of Suppes's definition of causality. In Humphreys, P. (Ed.) Patrick Suppes: scientific philosopher, Vol, 1 (pp. 381399). The Netherlands : Kluwer.
  • Leslie, A. M. (1984). Spatiotemporal contiguity and perception of causality in infants. Perception, 13, 287305.
  • Leslie, A. M. (1994). Pretending and believing: issues in the theory of ToMM [Theory of Mind Mechanism]. Cognition, 50, 211238.
  • Lewis, C. (1986). A model of mental model construction. Proceedings of CHI '86 conference on human factors in computer systems. New York : Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford : Blackwell.
  • Lober, K., & Shanks, D. R. (1999). Experimental falsification of Cheng's (1997) Power PC theory of causal induction. Psychological Review, in press.
  • Lombard, L. M. (1990). Causes, enablers, and the counterfactual analysis. Philosophical Studies, 59, 195211.
  • Mackie, J. L. (1980). The cement of the universe: a study in causation. (2nd ed.) Oxford : Oxford University Press.
  • Mandel, D. R., & Lehman, D. R. (1998). Integration of contingency information in judgements of cause, covariation and probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 269285.
  • Markovits, H., & Savary, F. (1992). Pragmatic schemas and the selection task: to reason or not to reason. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 133148.
  • McArthur, L. (1972). The how and what of why: some determinants and consequences of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 171193.
  • McEleney, A., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2001). Counterfactual thinking and causal explanation. Under submission.
  • McGill, A. L. (1989). Context effects in judgments of causation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 189200.
  • Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality. London : Methuen. (Originally published 1946.)
  • Mill, J.S. (1874) A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive: being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific evidence. (8th ed.) New York : Harper. (First edition published 1843.)
  • Miller, G. A., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and perception. Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press.
  • Miyake, N. (1986). Constructive interaction and the iterative process of understanding. Cognitive Science, 10, 151177.
  • Morris, M. W., & Nisbett, R. E. (1993). Tools of the trade: deductive schemas taught in psychology and philosophy. Nisbett, R.E. (Ed.) Rules for reasoning (pp. 228256). Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Newstead, S. E., Ellis, M. C., Evans, J.St.B.T., & Dennis, I. (1997). Conditional reasoning with realistic material. Thinking & Reasoning, 3, 4976.
  • Osherson, D. N. (19746). Logical abilities in children, Vols. 1–4. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Over, D. E., & Green, D. W. (2001). Contingency, causation, and adaptive inference. Psychological Review, in press.
  • Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Revised Second Printing. San Francisco : Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Reichenbach, H. (1956). The direction of time. Berkeley : University of California Press.
  • Rips, L. J. (1994). The psychology of proof. Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Russell, B. A. W. (191213). On the notion of cause. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 13, 126.
  • Salmon, W. C. (1980). Probabilistic causality. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 61, 5074.
  • Santamaria, C., Garcia-Madruga, J. A., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1998). Reasoning from double conditionals: the effects of logical structure and believability. Thinking and Reasoning, 4, 97122.
  • Schaeken, W. S., Johnson-Laird, P. N., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1996). Mental models and temporal reasoning. Cognition, 60, 205234.
  • Schustack, M. W. (1988). Thinking about causality. In Sternberg, R.J. & Smith, E.E. (Eds.) The Psychology of thinking (pp. 92115). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  • Schustack, M. W., & Sternberg, R. J. (1981). Evaluation of evidence in causal inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 101120.
  • Schwartz, D. L., Goldman, S. R., Vye, N. J., Barron, B. J., & CTGV. (1998). Aligning everyday and mathematical reasoning: the case of sampling assumptions. In Lajoie, S. (Ed.) Reflections on statistics: agendas for learning, teaching and assessment in K-12. (pp. 233274). Mahwah , NJ : Erlbaum.
  • Shafer, G. (1996). The art of causal conjecture. Cambridge : MIT Press.
  • Shaklee, H., & Fischhoff, B. (1982). Strategies of information search in causal analysis. Memory & Cognition, 10, 520530.
  • Shultz, T. R. (1982). Rules of causal attribution. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 47, 151.
  • Sloman, S. A. (1994). When explanations compete: the role of explanatory coherence on judgments of likelihood. Cognition, 52, 121.
  • Stalnaker, R. (1968). A theory of conditionals. In Rescher, N. (Ed.) Studies in logical theory. pp. 98112. Oxford : Blackwell.
  • Stevenson, R. J. (1993). Language, thought and representation. New York : Wiley.
  • Suppes, P. (1970). A probabilistic theory of causality. Amsterdam : North-Holland.
  • Suppes, P. (1984). Probabilistic metaphysics. Oxford : Basil Blackwell.
  • Taylor, R. (1966). Action and purpose. Englewood Cliffs , NJ : Prentice-Hall.
  • Thompson, V. A. (1995). Conditional reasoning: the necessary and sufficient conditions. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 160.
  • Tooley, M. (1987). Causality: a realist approach. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
  • Turnbull, W., & Slugoski, B. R. (1988). Conversational and linguistic processes in causal attribution. In Hilton, D. (Ed.) Contemporary science and natural explanation: commonsense conceptions of causality (pp. 6693). Brighton , Sussex : Harvester Press.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1980). Causal schemas in judgments under uncertainty. In Fishbein, M. (Ed.) Progress in social psychology. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca , NY : Cornell University Press.
  • von Mises, R. (1957). Probability, statistics and truth. Second revised English edition based on the third German Edition of 1951. London : Allen & Unwin.
  • von Wright, G. H. (1973). On the logic and epistemology of the causal relation. In Suppes, P. (Ed.) Logic, methodology and philosophy of science, IV (pp. 293312). Amsterdam : North-Holland.
  • Wason, P. C. (1966). Reasoning. In Foss, B.M. (Ed.) New horizons in psychology. Harmondsworth , Middlesex : Penguin.
  • White, P. A. (1995). Use of prior beliefs in the assignment of causal roles: causal powers versus regularity-based accounts. Memory and Cognition, 23, 243254.
  • Yang, Y., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2000). Illusions in quantified reasoning: how to make the impossible seem possible, and vice versa. Memory & Cognition, 28, 452465.