SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adamic, L. A. (1999). The small-world web. In S. Abiteboul & A-M. Vercoustre (Eds.), Research and advanced technology for digital libraries: Third European conference, ECDL 1999 (pp. 443452). New York : Springer.
  • Adamic, L. A. (2000). Zipf, power-laws, and pareto-A ranking tutorial. Retrieved July 1, 2003, from http:www.hpl.hp.comresearchidlpapersrankingranking.html.
  • Albert, R., & Barabasi, A. L. (2002). Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74(1), 47.
  • Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabasi, A. L. (1999, September 9). Diameter of the world wide web, Nature, 401, 130131.
  • Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabasi, A. L. (2000, July 27). Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature, 406, 378382.
  • Amaral, L. A. N., Scala, A., Barthelemy, M., & Stanley, H. E. (2000). Classes of small-world networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 1114911152.
  • Anderson, J. R. (2000). Learning and memory: An integrated approach (2nd ed.). New York : Wiley.
  • Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., & Pilotti, M. (1999). Item-level analyses of lexical decision performance: Results from a mega-study. In Abstracts of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomics Society (p. 44). Los Angeles , CA : Psychonomic Society.
  • Barabasi, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999, October 15). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509512.
  • Block, N. (1998). Semantics, conceptual role. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Online. Retrieved from http:www.rep.routledge.com.
  • Bollobas, B. (1985). Random graphs. London : Academic.
  • Brand, M., Rey A., Peereman, R., & Spieler, D. (2001). Naming bisyllabic words: A large scale study. Paper presented at the 12th Conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology (ESCOP 2001), Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. WWW7 Computer Networks, 30, 107117.
  • Brown, R. (1958a). How shall a thing be called? Psychological Review, 65, 1421.
  • Brown, R. (1958b). Words and things. Glencoe , IL : Free Press.
  • Brysbaert, M., Van Wijnendaele, I., & De Deyne, S. (2000). Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. Acta Psychologica, 104, 215226.
  • Carey, S. (1978). The child as word learner. In J. Bresnan, G. Miller & M. Halle (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 264293). Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Carey, S. (1985). Constraints on semantic development. In J. Mehler (Ed), Neonate cognition (pp. 381398). Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Carroll, J. B., & White, M. N. (1973). Word frequency and age-of-acquisition as determiners of picture naming latency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 8595.
  • Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague , The Netherlands : Mouton.
  • Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal behavior. Language, 35(1), 2658.
  • Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. New York : Cambridge University Press.
  • Clark, E. V. (2001). Making use of pragmatic inferences in the acquisition of meaning. In D. Beaver, S. Kaufman, B. Clark & L. Cazillas (Eds.), Stanford papers in semantics (pp. 2336). Stanford , CA : CSLI Publications.
  • Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407428.
  • Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240248.
  • Cormen, T., Leiserson, C., & Rivest, R. (1990). Introduction to algorithms. Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Deese, J. (1965). The structure of associations in language and thought. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Ellis, A. W., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: Insights from connectionist networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 11031123.
  • Erdüs, P., & Reyni, A. (1960). On the evolution of random graphs. Publications of the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 5, 1761.
  • Fellbaum, C. (Ed.) (1998). WordNet, an electronic lexical database. Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Fodor, J. A. (1998). Concepts: Where cognitive science went wrong. New York : Oxford University Press.
  • Gasser, M., & Smith, L. B. (1998). Learning nouns and adjectives: A connectionist account. Language & Cognitive Processes, 13, 269306.
  • Gentner, D. (1981). Some interesting differences between nouns and verbs. Cognition and Brain Theory, 4, 161178.
  • Gilhooly, K. J., & Logie, R. H. (1980). Age of acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity and ambiguity measures for 1944 words. Behaviour Research Methods and Instrumentation, 12, 395427.
  • Griffiths, T., & Steyvers, M. (2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(Suppl. 1), 52285235.
  • Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2002). A probabilistic approach to semantic representation. In W. Gray & C. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 381386). Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Hodges, J. R., Graham, N., & Patterson, K. (1995). Charting the progression in semantic dementia: Implications for the organisation of semantic memory. Memory, 3, 463495.
  • Hodgson, C., & Ellis, A. W. (1998). Last in, first to go: Age of acquisition and naming in the elderly. Brain & Language, 64, 146163.
  • Jeong, H., Tombor, B., Albert, R., Oltval, Z. N., & Barabasi, A. L. (2000, October 5). The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature, 407, 651654.
  • Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., & Jessell, T. M. (Eds.) (1991). Principles of neural science. Norwalk , CT : Appleton & Lange.
  • Keil, F. C. (1979). Semantic and conceptual development: An ontological perspective. Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press.
  • Kleinberg, J. M. (2000). Navigation in a small world. Nature, 406, 845.
  • Kleinberg, J. M. (2002). Small-world phenomena and the dynamics of information. In T. G. Dietterich, S. Becker & Z. Ghahramani (Eds.) Advances in neural information processing systems, 14, (pp. 431438). Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence , RI : Brown University Press.
  • Lambon Ralph, M. A., Graham, K. S., Ellis, A. W., & Hodges, J. R. (1998). Naming in semantic dementia—What matters? Neuropsychologia, 36, 775784.
  • Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211240.
  • Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259284.
  • Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
  • Lewis, M. B., Gerhand, S., & Ellis, H. D. (2001). Re-evaluating age-of-acquisition effects: Are they simply cumulative frequency effects? Cognition, 78, 189205.
  • Macnamara, J. (1982). Names for things: A study in human learning. Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Manning, C. D., & Schutze (1999). Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Milgram, S. (1967, May). The small-world problem. Psychology Today, 2, 6067.
  • Miller, G.A. (1995). WordNet: Anon-line lexical database [Special issue]. International Journal of Lexicography, 3(4).
  • Morrison, C. M., Chappell, T. D., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 528559.
  • Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1999). The University of South Florida word association norms. Retrieved from http:w3.usf.eduFreeAssociation.
  • Nelson, D. L., McKinney, V. M., Gee, N. R., & Janczura, G. A. (1998). Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition. Psychological Review, 105, 299324.
  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 404409.
  • Niyogi, P., & Berwick, R. C. (1997). Evolutionary consequences of language learning. Journal of Linguistics and Philosophy, 17, 697719.
  • Nowak, M. A., & Krakauer, D. C. (1999). The evolution of language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 80288033.
  • O'Reilly, R. C., & Munakata, Y. (2000). Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience: Understanding the mind by simulating the brain. Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York : Morrow.
  • Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56115.
  • Rips, L. J., Shoben, E. J., & Smith, E. E. (1973). Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 120.
  • Rogers, T. T., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). Semantic knowledge: A parallel distributed processing approach. Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Roget, P. M. (1911). Roget's Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases (1911 ed.). Retrieved October 28, 2004, from http:www.gutenberg.orgetext10681.
  • Simon, H. (1955). On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika, 42, 425440.
  • Skinner, B. F. (1937). The distribution of associated words. Psychological Record, 1, 7176.
  • Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the acquisition of grammar. In C. A. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 173208). New York : Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Sloman, S. A. (1998). Categorical inference is not a tree: The myth of inheritance hierarchies. Cognitive Psychology, 35, 133.
  • Sloman, S. A., Love, B. C., & Ahn, W. (1998). Feature centrality and conceptual coherence. Cognitive Science, 22, 189228.
  • Smith, M. A., Cottrell, G. W., & Anderson, K. L. (2001). The early word catches the weights. In T. K. Leen, T. G. Dietterich & V. Tresp (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 13 (pp. 5258). Cambridge MA : MIT Press.
  • Sommers, F. (1971). Structural ontology. Philosophia, 1(1), 2142.
  • Stoyan, D., Kendall, W. S., & Mecke, J. (1995). Stochastic geometry and its applications (2nd ed.). New York : Wiley.
  • Strogatz, S. H. (2001, March 8). Exploring complex networks. Nature, 410, 268276.
  • Turner, J. E., Valentine, T., & Ellis, A. W. (1998). Contrasting effects of age of acquisition and word frequency on auditory and visual lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 26, 12821291.
  • Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327352.
  • Tversky, A., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1986). Nearest neighbor analysis of psychological spaces. Psychological Review, 93, 322.
  • Warrington, E. K. (1975). The selective impairment of semantic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 635657.
  • Watts, D. J. (1999). Small worlds: The dynamics of networks between order and randomness. Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press.
  • Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998, June 4). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393, 440442.
  • Zipf, G. K. (1965). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Hafner : New York.