Explaining prosocial intentions: Testing causal relationships in the norm activation model

Authors

  • Linda. Steg,

    Corresponding author
    1. Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
      Correspondence should be addressed to Professor Dr Linda Steg, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/I, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands (e-mail: e.m.steg@rug.nl).
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Judith. de Groot

    1. Department of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK
    Search for more papers by this author

Correspondence should be addressed to Professor Dr Linda Steg, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/I, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands (e-mail: e.m.steg@rug.nl).

Abstract

This paper examines factors influencing prosocial intentions. On the basis of the norm activation model (NAM), we propose that four variables influence prosocial intentions or behaviours: (1) personal norms (PN), reflecting feelings of moral obligation to engage in prosocial behaviour, (2) awareness of adverse consequences of not acting prosocially, (3) ascription of responsibility for the negative consequences of not acting prosocially, and (4) perceived control over the problems. We conducted a series of experimental studies to examine how the NAM variables are causally related. As hypothesized, problem awareness, responsibility, and outcome efficacy played an important role in the development of PN and various types of prosocial intentions in the social as well as environmental domain.

Ancillary