Male and female managers' ability to read emotions: Relationships with supervisor's performance ratings and subordinates' satisfaction ratings
Article first published online: 31 DEC 2010
DOI: 10.1348/096317907X174349
2007 The British Psychological Society
Issue
2044-8325/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=f9df91eb93b2222f19ae5ec1215ca66540301b37)
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Volume 80, Issue 4, pages 713–733, December 2007
Additional Information
How to Cite
Byron, K. (2007), Male and female managers' ability to read emotions: Relationships with supervisor's performance ratings and subordinates' satisfaction ratings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80: 713–733. doi: 10.1348/096317907X174349
Publication History
- Issue published online: 31 DEC 2010
- Article first published online: 31 DEC 2010
- Received 19 April 2006; revised version received 21 December 2006
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
The present study examines the direct and indirect effect of managers' accuracy in ‘reading’ non-verbal emotional expressions and their supervisors' performance ratings and subordinates' satisfaction with the manager. Data from working managers and their supervisors and subordinates were used to test the study's hypotheses. Although managers' accuracy was not directly related to others' ratings, a significant interactive effect was found: Female but not male managers who more accurately perceived non-verbal emotional expressions received higher performance ratings from their supervisor and higher satisfaction ratings from their subordinates, perhaps due to gender stereotypes prescribing emotional sensitivity to female managers. Furthermore, how managers used emotional information to enhance subordinates' satisfaction varied for female and male managers. Results suggested that male managers who were more accurate at emotion perception received higher satisfaction ratings if they used the information to be more persuasive, whereas more emotionally perceptive female managers received higher satisfaction ratings when they demonstrated more supportiveness.

2044-8325/asset/olbannerleft.png?v=1&s=c17f080501e3acf4a343e5b34cc9fb9363c9d5fb)
2044-8325/asset/olbannerright.png?v=1&s=99fb67b5655ac703bf6fbed7a85267890c00ee80)