Psychosocial interventions for carers of survivors of stroke: A systematic review of interventions based on psychological principles and theoretical frameworks
Article first published online: 24 DEC 2010
2008 The British Psychological Society
British Journal of Health Psychology
Volume 13, Issue 3, pages 563–581, September 2008
How to Cite
Eldred, C. and Sykes, C. (2008), Psychosocial interventions for carers of survivors of stroke: A systematic review of interventions based on psychological principles and theoretical frameworks. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13: 563–581. doi: 10.1348/135910707X236899
- Issue published online: 24 DEC 2010
- Article first published online: 24 DEC 2010
- Received 17 September 2006; revised version received 24 July 2007
Purpose Most stroke survivors are cared for at home by informal carers, usually their partners or children. The chronic burden of meeting these care needs can have a significant impact on the psychological well-being of the carer. The aim of this review is to analyse interventions that target psychosocial functioning in carers of stroke survivors to understand how such interventions can reduce the burden of caring.
Method Seven studies that reported on randomized controlled trials of psychosocial interventions for informal adult carers of a survivor of stroke, which reported validated measures of psychological health outcome and met a satisfactory rating of quality were included in this systematic review.
Results A forest plot of two studies that used education and counselling as the intervention for patients and spouses indicate a more favourable outcome for the intervention on the global family functioning scale. The Clarke, Rubenach, and Winsor (2003) study showed that patients were more likely to benefit from an intervention consisting of counselling and education than spouses.
Conclusions It is noted that there are relatively few studies investigating the impact of psychologically based interventions for carers of stroke survivors and the quality of evidence is varied. However, there is evidence of good quality to show that stroke patients benefit from a counselling combined with education intervention. The clinical implications of this review suggests, according to current available evidence, that those working with survivors of stroke and their families should consider providing counselling and education interventions to patients in the first instance. More research is needed to determine the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving the psychosocial functioning of carers of survivors of stroke.