• 1
    Rose MD 1975 Functional proportions of primate lumbar vertebral bodies. J Hum Evol 4: 2138.
  • 2
    Isbell LA, Young TP 1996 The evolution of bipedalism in hominids and reduced group size in chimpanzees: Alternative responses to decreasing resource availability. J Hum Evol 30: 389397.
  • 3
    Wrangham RW 1980 Bipedal locomotion as a feeding adaptation in gelada baboons, and its implications for human evolution. J Hum Evol 9: 329331.
  • 4
    Frost JH 1980 Origin of bipedalism. Am J Phys Anthropol 52: 175189.
  • 5
    Preuschoft H, Hayama S, Guenther MM 1988 Curvature of the lumbar spine as a consequence of mechanical necessities in Japanese macaques trained for bipedalism. Folia Primatol (Basel) 50: 4258.
  • 6
    Farfan HF 1978 The biomechanical advantage of lordosis and hip extension for upright activity: Man as compared with other anthropoids. Spine 3: 336342.
  • 7
    Nakatsukasa M, Hayama S, Preuschoft H 1995 Postcranial skeleton of a macaque trained for bipedal standing and walking and implications for function adaptation. Folia Primatol (Basel) 64: 129.
  • 8
    Putz R, Muller-Gerbl M 1996 The vertebral column—a phylogenetic failure? Clin Anat 9: 205212.
  • 9
    Boszczyk BM, Boszczyk AA, Putz R 2001 Comparative and functional anatomy of the mammalian lumbar spine. Anat Rec 264: 157168.
  • 10
    Amman E 1979 Biomechanical interpretation of form and structure of bones: Roles of genetics and function in growth and remodelling. In: MorbeckME, PreuschoftH, GombergN (eds.) Environment, Behavior and Morphology: Dynamic Interpretations in Primates. Fischer, New York, NY, USA, pp. 347366.
  • 11
    Hayama S 1986 Spinal compensatory curvature found in Japanese macaques trained for the acquisition of bipedalism. J Growth 48: 377427.
  • 12
    Schultz AH 1953 The relative thickness of the long bones and the vertebrae in primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 3: 277311.
  • 13
    McCloskey EV, Spector TD, Eyres KS, Fern ED, O'Rourke N, Vasikaran S, Kanis JA 1993 The assessment of vertebral deformity: A method for use in population studies and clinical trials. Osteoporos Int 3: 138147.
  • 14
    Genant HK, Jergas M 2003 Assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis research. Osteoporos Int 14 (Suppl 3): S43S55.
  • 15
    Melton LJ III, Lane AW, Cooper C, O'Fallon WM, Riggs BL 1993 Prevalence and incidence of vertebral deformities. Osteoporos Int 3: 113119.
  • 16
    Eastell R, Cedel SL, Wahner HW, Riggs BL, Melton LJ III 1993 Classification of vertebral deformities. J Bone Miner Res 6: 207215.
  • 17
    Milne JS, Lauder IJ 1976 The relationship of kyphosis to the shape of vertebral bodies. Ann Hum Biol 3: 173179.
  • 18
    Edmondston SJ, Singer KP, Price RI, Day RE, Breidahl PD 1994 The relationship between bone mineral density, vertebral shape and spinal curvature in the elderly thoracolumbar spine: An in vitro study. Br J Radiol 67: 969975.
  • 19
    Cortet B, Houvenagel E, Puisieux F, Roches E, Garnier P, Delcambre B 1999 Spinal curvature and quality of life in women with vertebral fractures secondary to osteoporosis. Spine 24: 19211925.
  • 20
    Minne HW, Leidig G, Wuster C, Siromachkostov L, Baldauf G, Bickel R, Sauer P, Lojen M, Ziegler R 1988 A newly developed spine deformity index (SDI) to quantitate vertebral crush fractures in patients with osteoporosis. Bone Miner 3: 335349.