The authors have no conflict of interest.
Fracture Risk in Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance†
Version of Record online: 15 DEC 2003
Copyright © 2004 ASBMR
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Volume 19, Issue 1, pages 25–30, January 2004
How to Cite
Melton, L. J., Rajkumar, S. V., Khosla, S., Achenbach, S. J., Oberg, A. L. and Kyle, R. A. (2004), Fracture Risk in Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance. J Bone Miner Res, 19: 25–30. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.0301212
- Issue online: 2 DEC 2009
- Version of Record online: 15 DEC 2003
- Manuscript Accepted: 6 AUG 2003
- Manuscript Revised: 26 JUN 2003
- Manuscript Received: 5 MAY 2003
- monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance;
- vertebral fracture
To assess fractures in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), the precursor of multiple myeloma, we followed 488 Olmsted County, MN, residents with MGUS in a retrospective cohort study. There was a 2.7-fold increase in the risk of axial fractures but no increase in limb fractures. The pathophysiologic basis for the increased axial fractures should be determined.
Introduction: Multiple myeloma is often preceded by monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Fractures are common in myeloma as a result of lytic bone lesions, generalized bone loss, and elevated bone turnover from excessive cytokine production. Whether fractures are also increased in MGUS is unknown.
Materials and Methods: In a population-based retrospective cohort study, 488 Olmsted County, MN, residents with MGUS first diagnosed in 1960–1994 (52% men; mean age, 71.4 ± 12.8 years) were followed for 3901 person-years; follow-up was censored at progression to myeloma. The relative risk of fractures was assessed by standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), and risk factors were evaluated in proportional hazards models.
Results and Conclusions: Altogether, 200 patients experienced 385 fractures. Compared with expected rates in the community, statistically significant increases were seen for fractures at most axial sites, for example, vertebrae (SIR, 6.3; 95% CI, 5.2–7.5). There was a slight increase in hip (SIR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2–2.2) but not distal forearm fractures (SIR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.4–1.5). The relative risk (SIR) of any axial fracture was 2.7 (95% CI, 2.3–3.1) compared with only 1.1 (95% CI, 0.9–1.4) for all limb fractures combined. In a multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of any subsequent fracture were age (hazard ratio [HR] per 10-year increase, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2–1.6) and corticosteroid use (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2–2.6); greater weight at diagnosis (HR per 10 kg, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.8–0.9), and IgG monoclonal protein (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5–0.97) were protective. Baseline monoclonal protein level, a determinant of myeloma progression, did not predict fracture risk. Thus, the risk of axial, but not peripheral, fractures is increased among MGUS patients even before progression to myeloma. The pathophysiologic basis for this should be determined because elevated bone turnover, for example, might be treatable.