The authors state that they have no conflicts of interest.
Research-Article
Fracture Risk in Type 2 Diabetes: Update of a Population-Based Study†‡
Article first published online: 17 MAR 2008
DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.080323
Copyright © 2008 ASBMR
Additional Information
How to Cite
Melton, L. J., Leibson, C. L., Achenbach, S. J., Therneau, T. M. and Khosla, S. (2008), Fracture Risk in Type 2 Diabetes: Update of a Population-Based Study. J Bone Miner Res, 23: 1334–1342. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.080323
- †
- ‡
Published online on March 17, 2008;
Publication History
- Issue published online: 4 DEC 2009
- Article first published online: 17 MAR 2008
- Manuscript Revised: 13 MAR 2008
- Manuscript Accepted: 13 MAR 2008
- Manuscript Received: 25 SEP 2007
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- cohort study;
- diabetes;
- epidemiology;
- fractures;
- hip fracture
Abstract
We found no significant excess of fractures among Rochester, MN, residents with diabetes mellitus initially recognized in 1950–1969, but more recent studies elsewhere have documented an apparent increase in hip fracture risk. To explore potential explanations for any increase in fractures, we performed an historical cohort study among 1964 Rochester residents who first met glycemic criteria for diabetes in 1970–1994 (mean age, 61.7 ± 14.0 yr; 51% men). Fracture risk was estimated by standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), and risk factors were evaluated in Andersen-Gill time-to-fracture regression models. In 23,236 person-years of follow-up, 700 diabetic residents experienced 1369 fractures documented by medical record review. Overall fracture risk was elevated (SIR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2–1.4), but hip fractures were increased only in follow-up beyond 10 yr (SIR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–1.9). As expected, fracture risk factors included age, prior fracture, secondary osteoporosis, and corticosteroid use, whereas higher physical activity and body mass index were protective. Additionally, fractures were increased among patients with neuropathy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1–1.6) and those on insulin (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1–1.5); risk was reduced among users of biquanides (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.6–0.96), and no significant influence on fracture risk was seen with sulfonylurea or thiazolidinedione use. Thus, contrary to our earlier study, the risk of fractures overall (and hip fractures specifically) was increased among Rochester residents with diabetes, but there was no evidence that the rise was caused by greater levels of obesity or newer treatments for diabetes.

1523-4681/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=d7e4c0e37904a489128d3a4e58ba94214db307a9)
1523-4681/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=854ee0e4d351ead9faaca8bfab3e50b1c7c9d03d)
1523-4681/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=a8419ff5f302b0d9fefec557d81c0aa9776c60e3)