Effects of Exercise Involving Predominantly Either Joint-Reaction or Ground-Reaction Forces on Bone Mineral Density in Older Women

Authors

  • Wendy M. Kohrt,

    Corresponding author
    1. Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.
    • Wendy M. Kohrt, Ph.D. Washington University School of Medicine 660 S. Euclid, Box 8113 St. Louis, MO 63110 U.S.A.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Ali A. Ehsani,

    1. Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Stanley J. Birge JR.

    1. Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

This study compared the effects of two exercise training programs, 11 months in duration, on bone mineral density (BMD) in older, sedentary women. Thirty-nine women, aged 60–74 years, were assigned to the following groups: (a) a group that performed exercises that introduced stress to the skeleton through ground-reaction forces (GRF) (i.e., walking, jogging, stairs); (b) a group that performed exercises that introduced stress to the skeleton through joint-reaction forces (JRF) (i.e., weight lifting, rowing); or (c) a no-exercise control group. BMD of the whole body, lumbar spine, proximal femur, and distal forearm was assessed five times at ∼3-month intervals. The GRF and JRF exercise programs resulted in significant and similar increases in BMD of the whole body (2.0 ± 0.8% and 1.6 ± 0.4%, respectively), lumbar spine (1.8 ± 0.7% and 1.5 ± 0.5%, respectively), and Ward's triangle region of the proximal femur (6.1 ± 1.5% and 5.1 ± 2.1%, respectively). There was a significant increase in BMD of the femoral neck only in response to the GRF exercise program (GRF, 3.5 ± 0.8%; JRF, −0.2 ± 0.7%). There were no significant changes in BMD in control subjects. Among all exercisers, there was a significant inverse (r = −0.52, p < 0.01) relationship between increases in whole body BMD and reductions in fat mass, suggesting a dose response effect of exercise on bone mass. Although femoral neck BMD was responsive only to the GRF exercise program, some adaptations (i.e., increase in lean body mass and strength) that were specific to the JRF exercise program may be important in preventing osteoporotic fractures by reducing the risk for falls. It remains to be determined whether all of these benefits can be gained through a training program that combines the different types of exercises employed in this study.

Ancillary