A Three-Dimensional Simulation of Age-Related Remodeling in Trabecular Bone

Authors

  • J. C. Van Der Linden,

    1. Department of Orthopedics, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • J. A. N. Verhaar,

    1. Department of Orthopedics, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • H. Weinans

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Orthopedics, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Address reprint requests to: H. Weinans, PhD., Department of Orthopedics, Ee1614, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author

  • van der Linden JC, Weinans H, Verhaar JAN 2000 A three-dimensional simulation of age related remodeling in trabecular bone. Orthop Res Soc 46:713 (abstract).

Abstract

After peak bone mass has been reached, the bone remodeling process results in a decrease in bone mass and strength. The formation deficit, the deficit of bone formation compared with previous resorption, results in bone loss. Moreover, trabeculae disconnected by resorption cavities probably are not repaired. The contributions of these mechanisms to the total bone loss are unclear. To investigate these contributions and the concomitant changes in trabecular architecture and mechanical properties, we made a computer simulation model of bone remodeling using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) scans of human vertebral trabecular bone specimens. Up to 50 years of physiological remodeling were simulated. Resorption cavities were created and refilled 3 months later. These cavities were not refilled completely, to simulate the formation deficit. Disconnected trabeculae were not repaired; loose fragments generated during the simulation were removed. Resorption depth, formation deficit, and remodeling space were based on biological data. The rate of bone loss varied between 0.3% and 1.1% per year. Stiffness anisotropy increased, and morphological anisotropy (mean intercept length [MIL]) was almost unaffected. Connectivity density increased or decreased, depending on the remodeling parameters. The formation deficit accounted for 69–95%, disconnected trabeculae for 1–21%, and loose fragments for 1–17% of the bone loss. Increasing formation deficit from 1.8% to 5.4% tripled bone loss but only doubled the decrease in stiffness. Increasing resorption depth from 28 to 56 μm slightly increased bone loss but drastically decreased stiffness. Decreasing the formation deficit helps to prevent bone loss, but reducing resorption depth is more effective in preventing loss of mechanical stiffness.

Ancillary