SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Gregg EW, Kriska AM, Salamone LM, Roberts MM, Anderson SJ, Ferrell RE, Kuller LH, Cauley JA 1997 The epidemiology of quantitative ultrasound: A revue of the relationships with bone mass, osteoporosis and fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 7:8999.
  • 2
    Jergas M, Schmid G 1999 The role of quantitative ultrasound versus other techniques in osteoporosis assessment. In: NjehCF (ed.) Quantitative Ultrasound. Assessment of Osteoporosis and Bone Status. Martin Dunitz Ltd, London, UK, pp. 245281.
  • 3
    Cepollaro C, Gonnelli S, Pondrelli C, Martini S, Montagnani A, Rossi S, Gennari L, Gennari C 1997 The combined use of ultrasound and densitometry in the prediction of vertebral fracture. Br J Radiol 70:691696.
  • 4
    Greenspan SL, Bouxsein ML, Melton ME, Kolodny AH, Clair JH, Delucca PT, Stek M, Faulkner KG 1997 Precision and discriminatory ability of calcaneal bone assessment technologies. J Bone Miner Res 12:13031313.
  • 5
    Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I 1999 Contact quantitative ultrasound: An evaluation of precision, fracture discrimination, age-related bone loss and applicability of the WHO criteria. Osteoporos Int 10:441449.
  • 6
    Kung AWC, Luk KDK, Chu LW, Tang GWK 1999 Qantitative ultrasound and sympomatic vertebral fracture risk in chinese women. Osteoporos Int 10:456451.
  • 7
    Hamanaka Y, Yamamoto I, Takada M, Matsushita R 1999 Comparison of bone mineral density at various skeletal sites with quantitative ultrasound parameters of the calcaneus for assessment of vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Metab 17:195200.
  • 8
    Wüster C, Albanese C, De Aloysio D, Duboeuf F, Gambacciani M, Gonnelli S, Glüer CC, Hans D, Joly J, Reginster JY, De Terlizzi F, Cadossi R 2000 Phalangeal osteosonogrammetry study: Age-related changes, diagnostic sensitivity, and discrimination power. J Bon Miner Res 15:16031614.
  • 9
    Njeh CF, Hans D, Li J, Fan B, Fuerst T, He YQ, Tsuda-Futami E, Lu Y, Wu CY, Genant HK 2000 Comparison of six calcaneal quantitative ultrasound devices: Precision and hip fracture discrimination. Osteoporos Int 11:10511062.
  • 10
    Ekman A, Michaëlsson K, Petrén-Mallmin M, Ljunghall S, Mallmin H 2000 DXA of the hip and heel ultrasound but not densitometry of the fingers can discriminate female hip fracture patients form controls: A comparison between four different methods. Osteoporos Int 12:185191.
  • 11
    Gerdhem P, Magnusson H, Karlsson MK, Akesson K 2002 Ultrasound of the phalanges in not related to a previous fracture. J Clin Densitom 5:159166.
  • 12
    Hans D, Dargent-Molina P, Schott AM, Sebert JL, Cormier C, Kotzki PO, Delmas PD, Pouilles JM, Breart G, Meunier PJ 1996 Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: The EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet 348:511514.
  • 13
    Bauer DC, Gluër CC, Cauley JA, Vogt TM, Ensrud KE, Genant HK, Black DM 1997 Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women. A prospective study. Arch Intern Med 157:629634.
  • 14
    Cornuz J, Krieg MA, Burckhardt P 1999 Vorstellung de Studie “Schweizerische Evaluierung des Messmethoden des osteoporotischen Frakturrisikos” (SEMOF). Schweiz Ärztezeitung 80:349352.
  • 15
    Cornuz J, Krieg MA, Burckhardt P 1998 The use of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for calculating the sample size of a prospective cohort study in elderly women: The example of the SEMOF study. Osteoporos Int 8(Suppl 3):P054.
  • 16
    Burnand J, Cornuz J, Krieg MA, Burckhardt P for the SEMOF study group 2000 Validation of history of osteoporotic and non osteoporotic fractures provided by participants of the SEMOF study, a prospective cohort study on 7800 elderly women. Osteoporos Int 11(Suppl 2):S90.
  • 17
    Morris R, Mazess RB, Trempe J, Hanson J 1997 Stiffness compensates for temperature variation in ultrasound densitometry. J Bone Miner Res 12:S1;S388.
  • 18
    Mazess RB, Barden HS 1999 Ultrasound stiffness of the os calcis provides T-scores comparable to axial BMD. Calcif Tissue Int 64(Suppl 1):S104.
  • 19
    Hadji P, Hars O, Wüster C, Bock K, Alberts US, Bohnet HG, Emons G, Schulz KD 1999 Stiffness index identifies patients with osteoporotic fractures better than ultrasound velocity or attenuation alone. Maturitas 31:221226.
  • 20
    Krieg MA, Cornuz J, Büche D, Dambacher MA, Hartl F, Häuselmann HJ, Kraenzlin M, Lippuner K, Neff M, Pancaldi P, Rizzoli R, Tanzi F, Theiler R, Tyndall A, Wimpfheimer K, Burckhardt P 2002 Quality controls for two heel bone ultrasounds used in the SEMOF study. J Clin Densitom 5:335342.
  • 21
    Glüer CC, Blake G, Lu Y, Blunt A, Jergas M, Genant HK 1995 Accurate assessment of precision errors: How to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int 5:262270.
  • 22
    Hanley JA, McNeil BJ 1983 A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived form the same cases. Radiology 148:839843.
  • 23
    Hartl F, Tyndall A, Kraenzlin M, Bachmeier C, Gückel C, Senn U, Hans D, Theiler R 2002 Discriminatory ability of quantitative ultrasound parameters and bone mineral density in a population-based sample of postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures - results of the BOS-study. J Bone Miner Res 17:321330.
  • 24
    Glüer CC, Eastell R, Reid DM, Alenfeld, Dotta S, Barkmann R, Clowes JA, Stewart A, Roux C, Felsenberg D 2001 Association of quantitative ultrasound parameters and bone density with osteoporotic vertebral deformities in a population based sample: The OPUS study. J Bone Miner Res 16:S1;S196.
  • 25
    Clowes JA, Peel NFA, Eastell R 2001 Fracture of the distal forearm: Association with quantitative ultrasound measurements and bone density. J Bone Miner Res 16:S1;S469.
  • 26
    Allaoua S, Hans D, Genton L, Perron C, Delmi M, Rizzoli R, Vuagnat H, Pichard C, Slosman DO 2001 Influence of time since fracture on hip fracture discrimination assessed by quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneum. J Bone Miner Res 16:S1;S467.