The authors have no conflict of interest
Strategies for Avoiding Hip Impact During Sideways Falls†
Article first published online: 1 JUL 2003
Copyright © 2003 ASBMR
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Volume 18, Issue 7, pages 1267–1273, July 2003
How to Cite
Robinovitch, S. N., Inkster, L., Maurer, J. and Warnick, B. (2003), Strategies for Avoiding Hip Impact During Sideways Falls. J Bone Miner Res, 18: 1267–1273. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.7.1267
- Issue published online: 2 DEC 2009
- Article first published online: 1 JUL 2003
- Manuscript Accepted: 13 JAN 2003
- Manuscript Revised: 19 NOV 2002
- Manuscript Received: 9 SEP 2002
- hip fracture;
- wrist fracture;
During a fall, hip fracture risk increases 30-fold if there is direct impact to the hip. We conducted sideways falling experiments and found that subjects were able to avoid hip impact by rotating forward or by rotating backward during descent. These simple safe-landing strategies should be considered in designing hip fracture prevention programs.
Introduction: Ninety percent of hip fractures in the elderly are caused by falls. During a fall, hip fracture risk is increased 6-fold by falling sideways (instead of backward or forward) and 30-fold if direct impact occurs to the hip. Previous studies suggest that impact to the hip during a sideways fall can be avoided by rotating forward during descent to land on the outstretched hands. Presumably, an alternative strategy for avoiding hip impact is to rotate backward to land on the buttocks. We conducted sideways falling experiments to test the hypothesis that each of these falling strategies is equally effective in allowing one to avoid hip impact.
Materials and Methods: Twenty-two young adult women participated in trials where they were released from an inclined standing position into a sideways fall onto a foam mattress. Subjects were instructed to “land as softly as possible” and to “avoid impacting the hip” by either rotating forward or rotating backward during descent.
Results: We found that absolute values of the hip proximity angle, which described how close the impact site was to the lateral aspect of the pelvis, were not different in forward rotation and backward rotation trials (mean = 55.9 ± 22.4° versus 61.5 ± 15.8°, respectively). However, compared with forward rotation trials, backward rotation trials involved greater pelvis impact velocity (2.95 ± 0.25 versus 2.45 ± 0.77 m/s; p = 0.001) and greater whole-body kinetic energy at impact (238 ± 70 versus 156 ± 90 J; p = 0.001).
Conclusions: These results suggest that, during a sideways fall, individuals can avoid impact to the hip and thereby lower the risk for hip fracture by rotating forward or by rotating backward during descent. These simple yet effective safe-landing strategies should be considered in designing exercise-based hip fracture prevention programs.