The authors have no conflict of interest
Site and Gender Specificity of Inheritance of Bone Mineral Density†
Article first published online: 1 AUG 2003
Copyright © 2003 ASBMR
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Volume 18, Issue 8, pages 1531–1538, August 2003
How to Cite
Duncan, E. L., Cardon, L. R., Sinsheimer, J. S., Wass, J. A. and Brown, M. A. (2003), Site and Gender Specificity of Inheritance of Bone Mineral Density. J Bone Miner Res, 18: 1531–1538. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.8.1531
- Issue published online: 2 DEC 2009
- Article first published online: 1 AUG 2003
- Manuscript Accepted: 18 FEB 2003
- Manuscript Revised: 6 FEB 2003
- Manuscript Received: 17 OCT 2002
- bone density
Differences in genetic control of BMD by skeletal sites and genders were examined by complex segregation analysis in 816 members of 147 families with probands with extreme low BMD. Spine BMD correlated more strongly in male-male comparisons and hip BMD in female-female comparisons, consistent with gender- and site-specificity of BMD heritability.
Introduction: Evidence from studies in animals and humans suggests that the genetic control of bone mineral density (BMD) may differ at different skeletal sites and between genders. This question has important implications for the design and interpretation of genetic studies of osteoporosis.
Methods: We examined the genetic profile of 147 families with 816 individuals recruited through probands with extreme low BMD (T-score < −2.5, Z-score < −2.0). Complex segregation analysis was performed using the Pedigree Analysis Package. BMD was measured by DXA at both lumbar spine (L1-L4) and femoral neck.
Results: Complex segregation analysis excluded purely monogenic and environmental models of segregation of lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD in these families. Pure polygenic models were excluded at the lumbar spine when menopausal status was considered as a covariate, but not at the femoral neck. Mendelian models with a residual polygenic component were not excluded. These models were consistent with the presence of a rare Mendelian genotype of prevalence 3–19 %, causing high BMD at the hip and spine in these families, with additional polygenic effects. Total heritability range at the lumbar spine was 61–67 % and at the femoral neck was 44–67 %. Significant differences in correlation of femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD were observed between male and female relative pairs, with male-male comparisons exhibiting stronger lumbar spine BMD correlation than femoral neck, and female-female comparisons having greater femoral neck BMD correlation than lumbar spine. These findings remained true for parent-offspring correlations when menopausal status was taken into account. The recurrence risk ratio for siblings of probands of a Z-score < −2.0 was 5.4 at the lumbar spine and 5.9 at the femoral neck.
Conclusions: These findings support gender- and site-specificity of the inheritance of BMD. These results should be considered in the design and interpretation of genetic studies of osteoporosis.