SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Finer LB and Zolna MR, Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006, Contraception, 2011, 84(5):478485.
  • 2
    Kaye K, Suellentrop K and Sloup C, The Fog Zone: How Misperceptions, Magical Thinking, and Ambivalence Put Young Adults at Risk for Unplanned Pregnancy, Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, 2009.
  • 3
    Tang J, Maurer R and Bartz D, Intrauterine device knowledge and practices: a national survey of obstetrics and gynecology residents, Southern Medical Journal, 2013, 106(9):500505.
  • 4
    Harper CC et al., Evidence-based IUD practice: family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists, Family Medicine, 2012, 44(9):637645.
  • 5
    Harper CC et al., Counseling and provision of long-acting reversible contraception in the US: national survey of nurse practitioners, Preventive Medicine, 2013, 57(6):883888.
  • 6
    Eisenberg D, McNicholas C and Peipert JF, Cost as a barrier to long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use in adolescents, Journal of Adolescent Health, 2013, 52(4, Suppl.):S59S63.
  • 7
    Thompson KMJ et al., Contraceptive policies affect post-abortion provision of long-acting reversible contraception, Contraception, 2011, 83(1):4147.
  • 8
    Beeson T et al., Accessibility of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), Contraception, 2014, 89(2):9196.
  • 9
    Finer LB, Jerman J and Kavanaugh ML, Changes in use of long- acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007–2009, Fertility and Sterility, 2012, 98(4):893897.
  • 10
    Peipert JF et al., Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2012, 120(6):12911297.
  • 11
    Romer SE and Teal S, The BC4U service model: achieving astronomical LARC uptake in adolescents, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Reproductive Health Professionals, New Orleans, Sept. 18–21, 2013.
  • 12
    Finer LB, Sonfield A and Jones RK, Changes in out-of-pocket payments for contraception by privately insured women during implementation of the federal contraceptive coverage requirement, Contraception, 2014, 89(2):97102.
  • 13
    Spain JE et al., The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: recruiting women at highest risk for unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection, Journal of Women's Health, 2010, 19(12):22332238.
  • 14
    Hillard PJA, What is LARC? And why does it matter for adolescents and young adults? Journal of Adolescent Health, 2013, 52(4, Suppl.):S1S5.
  • 15
    Balsa AI, McGuire TG and Meredith LS, Testing for statistical discrimination in health care, Health Services Research, 2005, 40(1):227252.
  • 16
    Geronimus AT, Damned if you do: culture, identity, privilege, and teenage childbearing in the United States, Social Science & Medicine, 2003, 57(5):881893.
  • 17
    Collins PH, From Black Power to Hip Hop: Racism, Nationalism, and Feminism, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2006.
  • 18
    Johnson CG, Female inmates sterilized in California prisons without approval, Berkeley, CA: Center for Investigative Reporting, 2013, <http://cironline.org/reports/female-inmates-sterilized-california-prisons-without-approval-4917>, accessed Feb. 12, 2014.
  • 19
    National Conference on State Legislatures, Family cap policies, 2009, <http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/welfare-reform-family-cap-policies.aspx>, accessed Feb. 12, 2014.
  • 20
    Borrero S et al., The impact of race and ethnicity on receipt of family planning services in the United States, Journal of Women's Health, 2009, 18(1):9196.
  • 21
    Downing RA, LaVeist TA and Bullock HE, Intersections of ethnicity and social class in provider advice regarding reproductive health, American Journal of Public Health, 2007, 97(10):18031807.
  • 22
    Yee LM and Simon MA, Perceptions of coercion, discrimination and other negative experiences in postpartum contraceptive counseling for low-income minority women, Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 2011, 22(4):13871400.
  • 23
    Becker D and Tsui AO, Reproductive health service preferences and perceptions of quality among low-income women: racial, ethnic and language group differences, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2008, 40(4):202211.
  • 24
    Thorburn S and Bogart LM, African American women and family planning services: perceptions of discrimination, Women & Health, 2005, 42(1):2339.
  • 25
    Dehlendorf C et al., Recommendations for intrauterine contraception: a randomized trial of the effects of patients’ race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2010, 203(4):319.e1319.e8, <http://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(10)00578-8>, accessed Dec. 9, 2011.
  • 26
    United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, World Contraceptive Use 2012, New York: United Nations, 2012.
  • 27
    Bachrach C et al., Unplanned pregnancy and abortion in the United States and Europe: Why so different? Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, 2012.
  • 28
    Kearney MS and Levine PB, Why is the teen birth rate in the United States so high and why does it matter? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2012, 26(2):141166.
  • 29
    Haskins R, Poverty and opportunity: Begin with facts, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2014, <http://www.brookings.edu/research/testimony/2014/01/28-poverty-opportunity-begin-with-facts-haskins>, accessed Feb. 6, 2014.
  • 30
    Gomez AM and Clark J, Method mismatch: discrepancies between young women's contraceptive preferences and current method choice, poster presented at the North American Forum on Family Planning, Seattle, Oct. 6–7, 2013.
  • 31
    Gilliam ML et al., Concerns about contraceptive side effects among young Latinas: a focus-group approach, Contraception, 2004, 70(4):299305.
  • 32
    Garcia L, Respect Yourself, Protect Yourself: Latina Girls and Sexual Identity, New York: NYU Press, 2012.
  • 33
    Yee L and Simon M, The role of the social network in contraceptive decision-making among young, African American and Latina women, Journal of Adolescent Health, 2010, 47(4):374380.
  • 34
    Turok DK et al., A survey of women obtaining emergency contraception: Are they interested in using the copper IUD? Contraception, 2011, 83(5):441446.
  • 35
    Gilliam ML et al., Familial, cultural and psychosocial influences of use of effective methods of contraception among Mexican-American adolescents and young adults, Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 2011, 24(2):7984.
  • 36
    Kusunoki Y and Upchurch DM, Contraceptive method choice among youth in the United States: the importance of relationship context, Demography, 2011, 48(4):14511472.
  • 37
    Foster DG et al., Interest in using intrauterine contraception when the option of self-removal is provided, Contraception, 2012, 85(3):257262.
  • 38
    Foster DG et al., Interest in and experience with IUD self-removal, Contraception, 2014 (forthcoming).
  • 39
    Secura GM et al., The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2010, 203(2):115.e1115.e7, <http://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(10)00430-8>, accessed Feb. 13, 2014.
  • 40
    Peipert J et al., Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception: a preliminary analysis from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project, Contraception, 2010, 82(2):193194.
  • 41
    O'Neil-Callahan M et al., Twenty-four-month continuation of reversible contraception, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2013, 122(5):10831091.
  • 42
    Madden T et al., Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project, Contraception, 2013, 88(2):243249.
  • 43
    Roberts D, Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty, New York: Pantheon Books, 1997.
  • 44
    Romero D and Agénor M, US fertility prevention as poverty prevention: an empirical question and social justice issue, Women's Health Issues, 2009, 19(6):355364.
  • 45
    Gutierrez ER, Fertile Matters: The Politics of Mexican-Origin Women's Reproduction, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2008.
  • 46
    Stern AM, Sterilized in the name of public health: race, immigration, and reproductive control in modern California, American Journal of Public Health, 2005, 95(7):11281138.
  • 47
    Stevens J and Berlan ED, Applying principles from behavioral economics to promote long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods, comment, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2014, doi: 10.1363/46e0614, accessed Feb. 13, 2014.
  • 48
    Lessard LN et al., Contraceptive features preferred by women at high risk of unintended pregnancy, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2012, 44(3):194200.
  • 49
    Hatcher R, Trussell J and Nelson A, Contraceptive Technology, 20th ed., New York: Ardent Media, 2012.
  • 50
    Kluchin RM, Fit to Be Tied: Sterilization and Reproductive Rights in America, 1950–1980, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2011.
  • 51
    U.S. General Accounting Office, Welfare Reform: More Research Needed on TANF Family Caps and Other Policies for Reducing Out-of-Wedlock Births, Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office, 2001.
  • 52
    Takeshita C, The Global Biopolitics of the IUD: How Science Constructs Contraceptive Users and Women's Bodies, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.