SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Fu-Hsiang Chen, Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, Probing Organization Performance Using a New Hybrid Dynamic MCDM Method Based on the Balanced Scorecard Approach, Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 2015, 43, 4, 20130181

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Andson Braga de Aguiar, Paulo Natal Pinheiro, José Carlos Tiomatsu Oyadomari, How do different performance measures affect managerial time orientation? Empirical evidence from sales managers in the oil and gas industry, Advances in Accounting, 2014, 30, 1, 143

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Joanna L.Y. Ho, Anne Wu, Steve Y.C. Wu, Performance measures, consensus on strategy implementation, and performance: Evidence from the operational-level of organizations, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2014, 39, 1, 38

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Mandy M. Cheng, Rodney Coyte, The effects of incentive subjectivity and strategy communication on knowledge-sharing and extra-role behaviours, Management Accounting Research, 2014, 25, 2, 119

    CrossRef

  5. You have free access to this content5
    Mandy Cheng, Wendy Green, Pieter Conradie, Noriyuki Konishi, Andrea Romi, The International Integrated Reporting Framework: Key Issues and Future Research Opportunities, Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 2014, 25, 1
  6. 6
    Lei Wang, Brad Tuttle, Using corporate social responsibility performance to evaluate financial disclosure credibility, Accounting and Business Research, 2014, 44, 5, 523

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    R. Lynn Hannan, Gregory P. McPhee, Andrew H. Newman, Ivo D. Tafkov, The Effect of Relative Performance Information on Performance and Effort Allocation in a Multi-Task Environment, The Accounting Review, 2013, 88, 2, 553

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Kip R. Krumwiede, Monte R. Swain, Todd A. Thornock, Dennis L. Eggett, The effects of task outcome feedback and broad domain evaluation experience on the use of unique scorecard measures, Advances in Accounting, 2013, 29, 2, 205

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Anne M. Farrell, Kathryn Kadous, Kristy L. Towry, Does the Communication of Causal Linkages Improve Employee Effort Allocations and Firm Performance? An Experimental Investigation, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 2012, 24, 1, 77

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Christian Homburg, Martin Artz, Jan Wieseke, Marketing Performance Measurement Systems: Does Comprehensiveness Really Improve Performance?, Journal of Marketing, 2012, 76, 3, 56

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    MARGARET H. CHRIST, SCOTT A. EMETT, SCOTT L. SUMMERS, DAVID A. WOOD, The Effects of Preventive and Detective Controls on Employee Performance and Motivation, Contemporary Accounting Research, 2012, 29, 2
  12. 12
    Bianca A.C. Groen, Marc J.F. Wouters, Celeste P.M. Wilderom, Why do employees take more initiatives to improve their performance after co-developing performance measures? A field study, Management Accounting Research, 2012, 23, 2, 120

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Lan Guo, Bernard Wong-On-Wing, Gladie Lui, Advances in Management Accounting, 2012,

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Ken T. Trotman, Hwee C. Tan, Nicole Ang, Fifty-year overview of judgment and decision-making research in accounting, Accounting & Finance, 2011, 51, 1
  15. 15
    KHIM KELLY, Accuracy of Relative Weights on Multiple Leading Performance Measures: Effects on Managerial Performance and Knowledge, Contemporary Accounting Research, 2010, 27, 2
  16. 16
    Michal Matějka, Kenneth A. Merchant, Wim A. Van der Stede, Employment Horizon and the Choice of Performance Measures: Empirical Evidence from Annual Bonus Plans of Loss-Making Entities, Management Science, 2009, 55, 6, 890

    CrossRef