On Discourse and Power: "Cults" and "Orientals" in Fiji
Article first published online: 7 JAN 2008
DOI: 10.1525/ae.1999.26.4.843
Additional Information
How to Cite
Kaplan, M. and Kelly, J. (1999), On Discourse and Power: "Cults" and "Orientals" in Fiji. American Ethnologist, 26: 843–863. doi: 10.1525/ae.1999.26.4.843
Publication History
- Issue published online: 7 JAN 2008
- Article first published online: 7 JAN 2008
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Essences are not origins, as is made clearer when approaching discourse via methods of Latour rather than Foucault. Tracking the emergence of power in the alignment of heterogeneous agents, institutions, and objects, we contrast the fates of efforts by two British colonial officials in Fiji, one who sought to outlaw a "dangerous" movement in 1887 and a second who sought to thwart union organizing among "orientals" in 1935. Though the second effort fit more closely with an existing grand discourse ("orientalism"), the first aligned changing fields of interest in Fiji and empire. The first gained the power to represent the real, and the second did not. Realities of colonial power contradict Latour's principle of symmetry, but not the rest of his approach to the making of power, [discourse, power, orientalism, cargo cults, colonialism, Latour, Foucault, Fiji]

1548-1425/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=ab5e8f6528a156182a369f9b366b8328b5433705)
1548-1425/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=3c2734fae32548135630ffa21b291e3cfb7bda85)
1548-1425/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=1eb8ca2b85b73cbad517b05a01145dae86ee9733)