“Dangerous Instrumentality”: The Bystander as Subject in Automobility
Article first published online: 7 JAN 2008
DOI: 10.1525/can.2004.19.1.61
Additional Information
How to Cite
Jain, S. S. L. (2004), “Dangerous Instrumentality”: The Bystander as Subject in Automobility. Cultural Anthropology, 19: 61–94. doi: 10.1525/can.2004.19.1.61
Publication History
- Issue published online: 7 JAN 2008
- Article first published online: 7 JAN 2008
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- legal history;
- product design;
- science and technology studies;
- technology;
- automobile
ABSTRACT The automobile has been rendered invisible as a designed object that injures not only its consumers but other users of the street. This blind spot in how liability has been distributed in crash injuries has had three primary effects. First, it has resulted in a material distribution of goods in which the legal liability of automobile design as a cause of injury has been minimized. Second, it has determined how goods such as public space have been distributed, and third, it has had a constitutive role on how social and legal subjects such as a bad mothers and negligent drivers have been produced.

1548-1360/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=35c3b1775eaa603cd5a6aa6c091deec9e123af75)
1548-1360/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=7f644e033579f5c97668bd123a3a27095c5384b4)