Activist Research v. Cultural Critique: Indigenous Land Rights and the Contradictions of Politically Engaged Anthropology
Article first published online: 7 JAN 2008
DOI: 10.1525/can.2006.21.1.96
Additional Information
How to Cite
Hale, C. R. (2006), Activist Research v. Cultural Critique: Indigenous Land Rights and the Contradictions of Politically Engaged Anthropology. Cultural Anthropology, 21: 96–120. doi: 10.1525/can.2006.21.1.96
Publication History
- Issue published online: 7 JAN 2008
- Article first published online: 7 JAN 2008
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- activist research;
- cultural critique;
- indigenous land rights;
- identity politics;
- Central America
With indigenous and Afro-Latin land rights in Central America as ethnographic context, this article makes the case for politically engaged anthropology. The argument builds from a juxtaposition between “cultural critique” and “activist research” distinguished mainly on methodological grounds. Activist scholars establish an alignment with an organized group of people in struggle and accompany them on the contradictory and partly compromised path toward their political goals. This yields research outcomes that are both troubled and deeply enriched by direct engagement with the complexities of political contention. A case in the Inter-American Human Rights Court, where an indigenous community called Awas Tingni forced the Nicaraguan government to recognize the community's ancestral lands, illustrates the promise of activist research, in spite of the inevitable contradictions that present themselves even when the struggle is ostensibly successful.

1548-1360/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=35c3b1775eaa603cd5a6aa6c091deec9e123af75)
1548-1360/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=7f644e033579f5c97668bd123a3a27095c5384b4)