• Abelson, R.P. (1995). Statistics as principled argument. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Duke, N.K., & Mallette, M.H. (2004). Conclusion. In N.K. Duke & M.H. Mallette (Eds.), Literacy research methodologies (pp. 347354). New York: Guilford.
  • Herber, H.L. (1994). Professional connections: Pioneers and contemporaries in reading. In R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 421). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
  • Howe, K., & Eisenhart, M. (1990). Standards for qualitative (and quantitative) research: A prolegomenon. Educational Researcher, 19(4), 29.
  • Phillips, D.C. (1987). Validity in qualitative research: Why the worry about warrant will not wane. Education and Urban Society, 20(1), 924.
  • Shavelson, R.J., & Towne, L. (Eds.). (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Shulman, L.S. (1997). Disciplines of inquiry in education: A new overview. In R.M. Jaeger (Ed.), Complementary methods for research in education (2nd ed., pp. 329). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.