research-article

You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article

Concise Review: Trends in Stem Cell Proteomics

Hossein Baharvand Ph.D.^1,*,
Ali Fathi¹,
Dennis van Hoof^2,3,
Ghasem Hosseini Salekdeh Ph.D.^4,*

Article first published online: 10 MAY 2007

DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0107

Issue

STEM CELLS

Volume 25, Issue 8, pages 1888–1903, August 2007

Additional Information

How to Cite

Baharvand, H., Fathi, A., van Hoof, D. and Salekdeh, G. H. (2007), Concise Review: Trends in Stem Cell Proteomics. STEM CELLS, 25: 1888–1903. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0107

Author Information

¹
Department of Stem Cells, Royan Institute, Tehran, Iran
²
Hubrecht Laboratory, Netherlands Institute of Developmental Biology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
³
Department of Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
⁴
Department of Physiology and Proteomics, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran, Karaj, Iran

Email: Hossein Baharvand Ph.D. (Baharvand50@yahoo.com), Ghasem Hosseini Salekdeh Ph.D. (h_salekdeh@abrii.ac.ir)

^*Department of Stem Cells, Royan Institute, P.O. Box 19395-4644, Tehran, Iran. Telephone: 98-21-22172330; Fax: 98-21-22414532

Publication History

Issue published online: 2 JAN 2009
Article first published online: 10 MAY 2007
Manuscript Accepted: 4 MAY 2007
Manuscript Received: 8 FEB 2007

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (3648K)

References

1
Blau HM, Brazelton TR, Weimann JM. The evolving concept of a stem cell: Entity or function? Cell 2001; 105:829–841.
2
Baharvand H. Embryonic stem cells: Establishment, maintenance, and differentiation. In: GrierEV, ed. Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc, 2006;1–63.
3
Klimanskaya I, Chung Y, Becker S et al. Human embryonic stem cell lines derived from single blastomeres. Nature 2006; 444:481–485.
4
Preston SL, Alison MR, Forbes SJ et al. The new stem cell biology: Something for everyone. Mol Pathol 2003; 56:86–96.
5
Ramalho-Santos M, Yoon S, Matsuzaki Y et al. “Stemness”: Transcriptional profiling of embryonic and adult stem cells. Science 2002; 298:597–600.
6
Ivanova NB, Dimos JT, Schaniel C et al. A stem cell molecular signature. Science 2002; 298:601–604.
7
Williams C, Wirta V, Meletis K et al. Catalog of gene expression in adult neural stem cells and their in vivo microenvironment. Exp Cell Res 2006; 312:1798–1812.
8
Wei CL, Miura T, Robson P et al. Transcriptome profiling of human and murine ESCs identifies divergent paths required to maintain the stem cell state. Stem Cells 2005; 23:166–185.
Direct Link:
9
Katz AJ, Tholpady A, Tholpady SS et al. Cell surface and transcriptional characterization of human adipose-derived adherent stromal (HADAS) cells. Stem Cells 2005; 23:412–423.
Direct Link:
10
Jeong JA, Hong SH, Gang EJ et al. Differential gene expression profiling of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells by DNA microarray. Stem Cells 2005; 23:584–593.
Direct Link:
11
Cimica V, Batusic D, Chen Y et al. Transcriptome analysis of rat liver regeneration in a model of oval hepatic stem cells. Genomics 2005; 86:352–364.
12
Richards M, Tan SP, Tan JH et al. The transcriptome profile of human embryonic stem cells as defined by sage. Stem Cells 2004; 22:51–64.
Direct Link:
13
Georgantas RW 3rd, Tanadve V, Malehorn M et al. Microarray and serial analysis of gene expression analyses identify known and novel transcripts overexpressed in hematopoietic stem cells. Cancer Res 2004; 64:4434–4441.
14
Silva WA Jr, Covas DT, Panepucci RA et al. The profile of gene expression of human marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 2003; 21:661–669.
Direct Link:
15
Anisimov SV, Tarasov KV, Tweedie D et al. Sage identification of gene transcripts with profiles unique to pluripotent mouse r1 embryonic stem cells. Genomics 2002; 79:169–176.
16
Bhattacharya B, Cai J, Luo Y et al. Comparison of the gene expression profile of undifferentiated human embryonic stem cell lines and differentiating embryoid bodies. BMC Dev Biol 2005; 5:22.
17
Bhattacharya B, Miura T, Brandenberger R et al. Gene expression in human embryonic stem cell lines: Unique molecular signature. Blood 2004; 103:2956–2964.
18
Josephson R, Sykes G, Liu Y et al. A molecular scheme for improved characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines. BMC Biol 2006; 4:28.
19
Li H, Liu Y, Shin S et al. Transcriptome coexpression map of human embryonic stem cells. BMC Genomics 2006; 7:103.
20
Player A, Wang Y, Bhattacharya B et al. Comparisons between transcriptional regulation and RNA expression in human embryonic stem cell lines. Stem Cells Dev 2006; 15:315–323.
21
Rao RR, Stice SL. Gene expression profiling of embryonic stem cells leads to greater understanding of pluripotency and early developmental events. Biol Reprod 2004;.
22
Rao S, Orkin SH. Unraveling the transcriptional network controlling ES cell pluripotency. Genome Biol 2006; 7:230.
23
Sun Y, Li H, Liu Y et al. Cross-species transcriptional profiles establish a functional portrait of embryonic stem cells. Genomics 2007; 89:22–35.
24
Sun Y, Li H, Yang H et al. Mechanisms controlling embryonic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 2006; 16:211–231.
25
Wilkins MR, Sanchez JC, Gooley AA et al. Progress with proteome projects: Why all proteins expressed by a genome should be identified and how to do it. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 1996; 13:19–50.
26
Unwin RD, Gaskell SJ, Evans CA et al. The potential for proteomic definition of stem cell populations. Exp Hematol 2003; 31:1147–1159.
27
Hoffrogge R, Mikkat S, Scharf C et al. 2-DE proteome analysis of a proliferating and differentiating human neuronal stem cell line (ReNcell VM). Proteomics 2006; 6:1833–1847.
Direct Link:
28
Roche S, Provansal M, Tiers L et al. Proteomics of primary mesenchymal stem cells. Regen Med 2006; 1:511–517.
29
van Hoof D, Mummery CL, Heck AJ et al. Embryonic stem cell proteomics. Expert Rev Proteomics 2006; 3:427–437.
- CrossRef,
- PubMed,
- CAS,
- Web of Science®
30
Baltimore D. Our genome unveiled. Nature 2001; 409:814–816.
31
Wilkins MR, Gasteiger E, Gooley AA et al. High-throughput mass spectrometric discovery of protein post-translational modifications. J Mol Biol 1999; 289:645–657.
32
Godovac-Zimmermann J, Brown LR. Perspectives for mass spectrometry and functional proteomics. Mass Spectrom Rev 2001; 20:1–57.
Direct Link:
33
Celis JE, Gromov P. 2D protein electrophoresis: Can it be perfected? Curr Opin Biotechnol 1999; 10:16–21.
34
Bauer A, Kuster B. Affinity purification-mass spectrometry. Powerful tools for the characterization of protein complexes. Eur J Biochem 2003; 270:570–578.
Direct Link:
35
Foster LJ, Zeemann PA, Li C et al. Differential expression profiling of membrane proteins by quantitative proteomics in a human mesenchymal stem cell line undergoing osteoblast differentiation. Stem Cells 2005; 23:1367–1377.
Direct Link:
36
Nunomura K, Nagano K, Itagaki C et al. Cell surface labeling and mass spectrometry reveal diversity of cell surface markers and signaling molecules expressed in undifferentiated mouse embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005; 4:1968–1976.
37
O'Farrell PH. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J Biol Chem 1975; 250:4007–4021.
38
Gorg A, Postel W, Gunther S. The current state of two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 1988; 9:531–546.
Direct Link:
39
Gorg A, Weiss W, Dunn MJ. Current two-dimensional electrophoresis technology for proteomics. Proteomics 2004; 4:3665–3685.
Direct Link:
40
Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 2003; 422:198–207.
41
Domon B, Aebersold R. Mass spectrometry and protein analysis. Science 2006; 312:212–217.
42
Henzel WJ, Billeci TM, Stults JT et al. Identifying proteins from two-dimensional gels by molecular mass searching of peptide fragments in protein sequence databases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993; 90:5011–5015.
43
Futcher B, Latter GI, Monardo P et al. A sampling of the yeast proteome. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19:7357–7368.
44
Perrot M, Sagliocco F, Mini T et al. Two-dimensional gel protein database of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (update 1999). Electrophoresis 1999; 20:2280–2298.
Direct Link:
45
Gygi SP, Corthals GL, Zhang Y et al. Evaluation of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis-based proteome analysis technology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97:9390–9395.
46
Molloy MP. Two-dimensional electrophoresis of membrane proteins using immobilized pH gradients. Anal Biochem 2000; 280:1–10.
47
Link AJ, Eng J, Schieltz DM et al. Direct analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry. Nat Biotechnol 1999; 17:676–682.
48
Wolters DA, Washburn MP, Yates JR 3rd. An automated multidimensional protein identification technology for shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem 2001; 73:5683–5690.
49
Han DK, Eng J, Zhou H et al. Quantitative profiling of differentiation-induced microsomal proteins using isotope-coded affinity tags and mass spectrometry. Nat Biotechnol 2001; 19:946–951.
50
Andersen JS, Wilkinson CJ, Mayor T et al. Proteomic characterization of the human centrosome by protein correlation profiling. Nature 2003; 426:570–574.
51
Issaq HJ, Veenstra TD, Conrads TP et al. The SELDI-TOF MS approach to proteomics: Protein profiling and biomarker identification. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002; 292:587–592.
52
Elliott ST, Crider DG, Garnham CP et al. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis database of murine r1 embryonic stem cells. Proteomics 2004; 4:3813–3832.
Direct Link:
53
Nagano K, Taoka M, Yamauchi Y et al. Large-scale identification of proteins expressed in mouse embryonic stem cells. Proteomics 2005; 5:1346–1361.
Direct Link:
54
van Hoof D, Passier R, Ward-Van Oostwaard D et al. A quest for human and mouse embryonic stem cell-specific proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics 2006; 5:1261–1273.
55
Baharvand H, Hajheidari M, Ashtiani SK et al. Proteomic signature of human embryonic stem cells. Proteomics 2006; 6:3544–3549.
Direct Link:
56
Feldmann RE Jr, Bieback K, Maurer MH et al. Stem cell proteomes: A profile of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from umbilical cord blood. Electrophoresis 2005; 26:2749–2758.
Direct Link:
57
Salasznyk RM, Westcott AM, Klees RF et al. Comparing the protein expression profiles of human mesenchymal stem cells and human osteoblasts using gene ontologies. Stem Cells Dev 2005; 14:354–366.
58
Maurer MH, Feldmann RE Jr, Futterer CD et al. The proteome of neural stem cells from adult rat hippocampus. Proteome Sci 2003; 1:4.
- CrossRef,
- PubMed
59
Maurer MH, Feldmann RE Jr, Futterer CD et al. Comprehensive proteome expression profiling of undifferentiated versus differentiated neural stem cells from adult rat hippocampus. Neurochem Res 2004; 29:1129–1144.
60
DeLany JP, Floyd ZE, Zvonic S et al. Proteomic analysis of primary cultures of human adipose-derived stem cells: Modulation by adipogenesis. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005; 4:731–740.
61
Hemmati-Brivanlou A, Melton D. Vertebrate embryonic cells will become nerve cells unless told otherwise. Cell 1997; 88:13–17.
62
Tropepe V, Hitoshi S, Sirard C et al. Direct neural fate specification from embryonic stem cells: A primitive mammalian neural stem cell stage acquired through a default mechanism. Neuron 2001; 30:65–78.
63
Guo X, Ying W, Wan J et al. Proteomic characterization of early-stage differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells into neural cells induced by all-trans retinoic acid in vitro. Electrophoresis 2001; 22:3067–3075.
Direct Link:
64
Wang D, Gao L. Proteomic analysis of neural differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Proteomics 2005; 5:4414–4426.
Direct Link:
65
Battersby A, Jones RD, Lilley KS et al. Comparative proteomic analysis reveals differential expression of hsp25 following the directed differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 2007; 1773:147–156.
66
Kurisaki A, Hamazaki TS, Okabayashi K et al. Chromatin-related proteins in pluripotent mouse embryonic stem cells are downregulated after removal of leukemia inhibitory factor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005; 335:667–675.
67
Kadota M, Nishigaki R, Wang CC et al. Proteomic signatures and aberrations of mouse embryonic stem cells containing a single human chromosome 21 in neuronal differentiation: An in vitro model of down syndrome. Neuroscience 2004; 129:325–335.
68
An J, Yuan Q, Wang C et al. Differential display of proteins involved in the neural differentiation of mouse embryonic carcinoma p19 cells by comparative proteomic analysis. Proteomics 2005; 5:1656–1668.
Direct Link:
69
Wang D, Park JS, Chu JS et al. Proteomic profiling of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells upon transforming growth factor beta1 stimulation. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:43725–43734.
70
Lee HK, Lee BH, Park SA et al. The proteomic analysis of an adipocyte differentiated from human mesenchymal stem cells using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Proteomics 2006; 6:1223–1229.
Direct Link:
71
Tao W, Wang M, Voss ED et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of human cd34+ stem/progenitor cells and mature cd15+ myeloid cells. Stem Cells 2004; 22:1003–1014.
Direct Link:
72
Puente LG, Borris DJ, Carriere JF et al. Identification of candidate regulators of embryonic stem cell differentiation by comparative phosphoprotein affinity profiling. Mol Cell Proteomics 2006; 5:57–67.
73
Wu WW, Wang G, Baek SJ et al. Comparative study of three proteomic quantitative methods, DIGE, cICAT, and iTRAQ, using 2D gel- or LC-MALDI TOF/TOF. J Proteome Res 2006; 5:651–658.
74
Gu S, Chen J, Dobos KM et al. Comprehensive proteomic profiling of the membrane constituents of a mycobacterium tuberculosis strain. Mol Cell Proteomics 2003; 2:1284–1296.
75
Zhao Y, Zhang W, Kho Y et al. Proteomic analysis of integral plasma membrane proteins. Anal Chem 2004; 76:1817–1823.
76
Levchenko A. Proteomics takes stem cell analyses to another level. Nat Biotechnol 2005; 23:828–830.
77
Unwin RD, Smith DL, Blinco D et al. Quantitative proteomics reveals posttranslational control as a regulatory factor in primary hematopoietic stem cells. Blood 2006; 107:4687–4694.
78
Schrattenholz A, Wozny W, Klemm M et al. Differential and quantitative molecular analysis of ischemia complexity reduction by isotopic labeling of proteins using a neural embryonic stem cell model. J Neurol Sci 2005; 229–230:261–267.
79
Prudhomme W, Daley GQ, Zandstra P et al. Multivariate proteomic analysis of murine embryonic stem cell self-renewal versus differentiation signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:2900–2905.
80
Kratchmarova I, Blagoev B, Haack-Sorensen M et al. Mechanism of divergent growth factor effects in mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Science 2005; 308:1472–1477.
81
Carrette O, Burkhard PR, Sanchez JC et al. State-of-the-art two-dimensional gel electrophoresis: A key tool of proteomics research. Nat Protoc 2006; 1:812–823.
82
Zenzmaier C, Gesslbauer B, Grobuschek N et al. Proteomic profiling of human stem cells derived from umbilical cord blood. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005; 328:968–972.
83
van de Stolpe A, van den Brink S, van Rooijen M et al. Human embryonic stem cells: Towards therapies for cardiac disease. Derivation of a Dutch human embryonic stem cell line. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 11:476–485.
- CrossRef,
- PubMed,
- CAS
84
Reubinoff BE, Pera MF, Fong CY et al. Embryonic stem cell lines from human blastocysts: Somatic differentiation in vitro. Nat Biotechnol 2000; 18:399–404.
85
Cowan CA, Klimanskaya I, McMahon J et al. Derivation of embryonic stem-cell lines from human blastocysts. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1353–1356.
86
Mummery C, Ward-van Oostwaard D, Doevendans P et al. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to cardiomyocytes: Role of coculture with visceral endoderm-like cells. Circulation 2003; 107:2733–2740.
87
Allegrucci C, Young LE. Differences between human embryonic stem cell lines. Hum Reprod Update 2007; 13:103–120.
88
Loring JF, Rao MS. Establishing standards for the characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines. Stem Cells 2006; 24:145–150.
Direct Link:
89
Maitra A, Arking DE, Shivapurkar N et al. Genomic alterations in cultured human embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 2005; 37:1099–1103.
90
Sun HJ, Bahk YY, Choi YR et al. A proteomic analysis during serial subculture and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cell. J Orthop Res 2006; 24:2059–2071.
Direct Link:
91
Rosler ES, Fisk GJ, Ares X et al. Long-term culture of human embryonic stem cells in feeder-free conditions. Dev Dyn 2004; 229:259–274.
Direct Link:
92
Wu H, Sun YE. Epigenetic regulation of stem cell differentiation. Pediatr Res 2006; 59:21R–25R.
93
Odorico JS, Kaufman DS, Thomson JA. Multilineage differentiation from human embryonic stem cell lines. Stem Cells 2001; 19:193–204.
Direct Link:
94
Hayman MW, Przyborski SA. Proteomic identification of biomarkers expressed by human pluripotent stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004; 316:918–923.
95
Liu CH, Hwang SM. Cytokine interactions in mesenchymal stem cells from cord blood. Cytokine 2005; 32:270–279.
96
Sakaguchi M, Shingo T, Shimazaki T et al. A carbohydrate-binding protein, galectin-1, promotes proliferation of adult neural stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:7112–7117.
97
Tibes R, Qiu Y, Lu Y et al. Reverse phase protein array: Validation of a novel proteomic technology and utility for analysis of primary leukemia specimens and hematopoietic stem cells. Mol Cancer Ther 2006; 5:2512–2521.
98
Lim JW, Bodnar A. Proteome analysis of conditioned medium from mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder layers which support the growth of human embryonic stem cells. Proteomics 2002; 2:1187–1203.
Direct Link:
99
Prowse AB, McQuade LR, Bryant KJ et al. A proteome analysis of conditioned media from human neonatal fibroblasts used in the maintenance of human embryonic stem cells. Proteomics 2005; 5:978–989.
Direct Link:
100
Zvonic S, Lefevre M, Kilroy G et al. Secretome of primary cultures of human adipose-derived stem cells: Modulation of serpins by adipogenesis. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007; 6:18–28.
101
Kaiser T, Kamal H, Rank A et al. Proteomics applied to the clinical follow-up of patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2004; 104:340–349.
102
Wang H, Clouthier SG, Galchev V et al. Intact-protein-based high-resolution three-dimensional quantitative analysis system for proteome profiling of biological fluids. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005; 4:618–625.
103
Imanguli MM, Atkinson JC, Harvey KE et al. Changes in salivary proteome following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Exp Hematol 2007; 35:184–192.
104
Weissinger EM, Schiffer E, Hertenstein B et al. Proteomic patterns predict acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2007; 109:5511–5519.
105
Perillo NL, Marcus ME, Baum LG. Galectins: Versatile modulators of cell adhesion, cell proliferation, and cell death. J Mol Med 1998; 76:402–412.
106
Wang J, Rao S, Chu J et al. A protein interaction network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature 2006; 444:364–368.
107
Zhang J, Tam WL, Tong GQ et al. Sall4 modulates embryonic stem cell pluripotency and early embryonic development by the transcriptional regulation of pou5f1. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:1114–1123.
108
Elling U, Klasen C, Eisenberger T et al. Murine inner cell mass-derived lineages depend on sall4 function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:16319–16324.
109
Wu Q, Chen X, Zhang J et al. Sall4 interacts with nanog and co-occupies nanog genomic sites in embryonic stem cells. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:24090–24094.
110
Ong SE, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative. Nat Chem Biol 2005; 1:252–262.
111
Andrews PW, Benvenisty N, McKay R et al. The international stem cell initiative: Toward benchmarks for human embryonic stem cell research. Nat Biotechnol 2005; 23:795–797.
112
Rao MS, Civin CI. Translational research: Toward better characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines. Stem Cells 2005; 23:1453.
Direct Link:
113
Tonge R, Shaw J, Middleton B et al. Validation and development of fluorescence two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis proteomics technology. Proteomics 2001; 1:377–396.
Direct Link:
114
Berggren K, Steinberg TH, Lauber WM et al. A luminescent ruthenium complex for ultrasensitive detection of proteins immobilized on membrane supports. Anal Biochem 1999; 276:129–143.
115
Hu Q, Noll RJ, Li H et al. The Orbitrap: A new mass spectrometer. J Mass Spectrom 2005; 40:430–443.
Direct Link:
116
Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA et al. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat Biotechnol 1999; 17:994–999.
117
Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol Cell Proteomics 2004; 3:1154–1169.
118
Mirgorodskaya OA, Kozmin YP, Titov MI et al. Quantitation of peptides and proteins by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry using (18)O-labeled internal standards. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2000; 14:1226–1232.
Direct Link:
119
Yao X, Freas A, Ramirez J et al. Proteolytic 18O labeling for comparative proteomics: Model studies with two serotypes of adenovirus. Anal Chem 2001; 73:2836–2842.
120
Baharvand H, Matthaei KI. Culture condition difference for establishment of new embryonic stem cell lines from the C57BL/6 and BALB/c mouse strains. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2004; 40:76–81.
121
Baharvand H, Ashtiani SK, Taee A et al. Generation of new human embryonic stem cell lines with diploid and triploid karyotypes. Dev Growth Differ 2006; 48:117–128.
Direct Link:
122
Baharvand H, Hajheidari M, Zonouzi R et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of mouse embryonic stem cells and neonatal-derived cardiomyocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006; 349:1041–1049.
123
Yin X, Mayr M, Xiao Q et al. Proteomic analysis reveals higher demand for antioxidant protection in embryonic stem cell-derived smooth muscle cells. Proteomics 2006; 6:6437–6446.
Direct Link:
124
Colter DC, Sekiya I, Prockop DJ. Identification of a subpopulation of rapidly self-renewing and multipotential adult stem cells in colonies of human marrow stromal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98:7841–7845.
125
Wagner W, Feldmann RE Jr, Seckinger A, et al. The heterogeneity of human mesenchymal stem cell preparations—Evidence from simultaneous analysis of proteomes and transcriptomes. Exp Hematol 2006; 34:536–548.
126
Choi CB, Cho YK, Prakash KV et al. Analysis of neuron-like differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006; 350:138–146.
127
Ye NS, Zhang RL, Zhao YF et al. Effect of 5-azacytidine on the protein expression of porcine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2006; 4:18–25.
- CrossRef,
- PubMed,
- CAS
128
Ye NS, Chen J, Luo GA et al. Proteomic profiling of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells induced by 5-azacytidine. Stem Cells Dev 2006; 15:665–676.
129
Osterhues A, Liebmann S, Schmid M et al. Stem cells and experimental leukemia can be distinguished by lipid raft protein composition. Stem Cells Dev 2006; 15:677–686.
130
Jeong JA, Lee Y, Lee W et al. Proteomic analysis of the hydrophobic fraction of mesenchymal stem cells derived from human umbilical cord blood. Mol Cells 2006; 22:36–43.
131
Unwin RD, Whetton AD. Systematic proteome and transcriptome analysis of stem cell populations. Cell Cycle 2006; 5:1587–1591.
132
Gevaert K, Pinxteren J, Demol H et al. Four stage liquid chromatographic selection of methionyl peptides for peptide-centric proteome analysis: The proteome of human multipotent adult progenitor cells. J Proteome Res 2006; 5:1415–1428.

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (3648K)

JOURNAL TOOLS

JOURNAL MENU

FIND ISSUES

FIND ARTICLES

GET ACCESS

FOR CONTRIBUTORS

ABOUT THIS JOURNAL

SPECIAL FEATURES

Concise Review: Trends in Stem Cell Proteomics

STEM CELLS

How to Cite

Author Information

Publication History

ARTICLE TOOLS

References

More content like this

JOURNAL TOOLS

JOURNAL MENU

FIND ISSUES

FIND ARTICLES

GET ACCESS

FOR CONTRIBUTORS

ABOUT THIS JOURNAL

SPECIAL FEATURES

Concise Review: Trends in Stem Cell Proteomics

STEM CELLS

How to Cite

Author Information

Publication History

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

References

More content like this