Contrasting effects of mass-flowering crops on bee pollination of hedge plants at different spatial and temporal scales

Authors

  • Anikó Kovács-Hostyánszki,

    Corresponding author
    1. MTA ÖK, Lendület Ecosystem Services Research Group, Alkotmány út 2-4, H-2163 Vácrátót, Hungary
    2. Agroecology, Department of Crop Sciences, Georg-August University, Grisebachstr. 6, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Sebastian Haenke,

    1. Agroecology, Department of Crop Sciences, Georg-August University, Grisebachstr. 6, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Péter Batáry,

    1. Agroecology, Department of Crop Sciences, Georg-August University, Grisebachstr. 6, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
    2. MTA-ELTE-MTM Ecology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary, Baross u. 13, H-1088 Budapest, Hungary
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Birgit Jauker,

    1. Justus Liebig University, Department of Animal Ecology, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392 Giessen, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author
  • András Báldi,

    1. MTA ÖK, Lendület Ecosystem Services Research Group, Alkotmány út 2-4, H-2163 Vácrátót, Hungary
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Teja Tscharntke,

    1. Agroecology, Department of Crop Sciences, Georg-August University, Grisebachstr. 6, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Andrea Holzschuh

    1. Agroecology, Department of Crop Sciences, Georg-August University, Grisebachstr. 6, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
    2. University of Würzburg, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author

  • Corresponding Editor: A. K. Brody.

Abstract

Landscape-wide mass-flowering of oilseed rape (canola Brassica napus) can considerably affect wild bee communities and pollination success of wild plants. We aimed to assess the impact of oilseed rape on the pollination of wild plants and bee abundance during and after oilseed-rape bloom, including effects on crop–noncrop spillover at landscape and adjacent-field scales. We focused on two shrub species (hawthorn Crataegus spp., dog rose Rosa canina) and adjacent herb flowering in forest edges, connected hedges, and isolated hedges in Lower Saxony, Germany. We selected 35 landscape circles of 1 km radius, differing in the amount of oilseed rape; 18 were adjacent to oilseed rape and 17 to cereal fields, and we quantified bee density via pan traps at all sites. Adjacent oilseed rape positively affected fruit mass and seed number per fruit of simultaneously flowering hawthorn (no effect on dog rose, which flowers after the oilseed rape bloom). At the landscape scale, oilseed rape had a negative effect on bumble bee density in the hedges during flowering due to dilution of pollinators per unit area and the consequently intensified competition between oilseed rape and wild shrubs, but a positive effect after flowering when bees moved to the hedges, which still provided resources. In contrast, positive landscape-scale effects of oilseed rape were found throughout the season in forest edges, suggesting that edges support nesting activity and enhanced food resources. Our results show that oilseed rape effects on bee abundances and pollination success in seminatural habitats depend on the spatial and temporal scale considered and on the habitat type, the wild plant species, and the time of crop flowering. These scale-dependent positive and negative effects should be considered in evaluations of landscape-scale configuration and composition of crops. Food resources provided by mass-flowering crops should be most beneficial for landscape-wide enhancement of wild bee populations if seminatural habitats are available, providing (1) nesting resources and (2) continuous flowering resources during the season.

Ancillary