Nonlinear responses in salt marsh functioning to increased nitrogen addition

Authors

  • Lucía Vivanco,

    1. IFEVA (Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura), Facultad de Agronomía, and CONICET (del Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas), Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1417DSE Argentina
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Irina C. Irvine,

    1. Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area, U.S. National Park Service, Thousand Oaks, California 91360 USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jennifer B. H. Martiny

    1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, California 92697 USA
    Search for more papers by this author

  • Corresponding Editor: S. K. Chapman.

Abstract

Salt marshes provide storm protection to shorelines, sequester carbon (C), and mitigate coastal eutrophication. These valuable coastal ecosystems are confronted with increasing nitrogen (N) inputs from anthropogenic sources, such as agricultural runoff, wastewater, and atmospheric deposition. To inform predictions of salt marsh functioning and sustainability in the future, we characterized the response of a variety of plant, microbial, and sediment responses to a seven-level gradient of N addition in three Californian salt marshes after 7 and 14 months of N addition. The marshes showed variable responses to the experimental N gradient that can be grouped as neutral (root biomass, sediment respiration, potential carbon mineralization, and potential net nitrification), linear (increasing methane flux, decreasing potential net N mineralization, and increasing sediment inorganic N), and nonlinear (saturating aboveground plant biomass and leaf N content, and exponentially increasing sediment inorganic and organic N). The three salt marshes showed quantitative differences in most ecosystem properties and processes rates; however, the form of the response curves to N addition were generally consistent across the three marshes, indicating that the responses observed may be applicable to other marshes in the region. Only for sediment properties (inorganic and organic N pool) did the shape of the response differ significantly between marshes. Overall, the study suggests salt marshes are limited in their ability to sequester C and N with future increases in N, even without further losses in marsh area.

Ancillary