Comparison of marine macrophytes for their contributions to blue carbon sequestration

Authors

  • Stacey M. Trevathan-Tackett,

    1. Plant Functional Biology and Climate Change Cluster, School of Environment, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales 2007 Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jeffrey Kelleway,

    1. Plant Functional Biology and Climate Change Cluster, School of Environment, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales 2007 Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Peter I. Macreadie,

    1. Plant Functional Biology and Climate Change Cluster, School of Environment, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales 2007 Australia
    2. Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria 3125 Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • John Beardall,

    1. School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800 Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Peter Ralph,

    1. Plant Functional Biology and Climate Change Cluster, School of Environment, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales 2007 Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Alecia Bellgrove

    Corresponding author
    1. Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria 3280 Australia
    Search for more papers by this author

  • Corresponding Editor: J. B. Yavitt.

Abstract

Many marine ecosystems have the capacity for long-term storage of organic carbon (C) in what are termed “blue carbon” systems. While blue carbon systems (saltmarsh, mangrove, and seagrass) are efficient at long-term sequestration of organic carbon (C), much of their sequestered C may originate from other (allochthonous) habitats. Macroalgae, due to their high rates of production, fragmentation, and ability to be transported, would also appear to be able to make a significant contribution as C donors to blue C habitats. In order to assess the stability of macroalgal tissues and their likely contribution to long-term pools of C, we applied thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) to 14 taxa of marine macroalgae and coastal vascular plants. We assessed the structural complexity of multiple lineages of plant and tissue types with differing cell wall structures and found that decomposition dynamics varied significantly according to differences in cell wall structure and composition among taxonomic groups and tissue function (photosynthetic vs. attachment). Vascular plant tissues generally exhibited greater stability with a greater proportion of mass loss at temperatures >300°C (peak mass loss ~320°C) than macroalgae (peak mass loss between 175−300°C), consistent with the lignocellulose matrix of vascular plants. Greater variation in thermogravimetric signatures within and among macroalgal taxa, relative to vascular plants, was also consistent with the diversity of cell wall structure and composition among groups. Significant degradation above 600°C for some macroalgae, as well as some belowground seagrass tissues, is likely due to the presence of taxon-specific compounds. The results of this study highlight the importance of the lignocellulose matrix to the stability of vascular plant sources and the potentially significant role of refractory, taxon-specific compounds (carbonates, long-chain lipids, alginates, xylans, and sulfated polysaccharides) from macroalgae and seagrasses for their long-term sedimentary C storage.

This study shows that marine macroalgae do contain refractory compounds and thus may be more valuable to long-term carbon sequestration than we previously have considered.

Ancillary