SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Woodworth GG. 2004. Biostatistics. A Bayesian Introduction. John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
  • 2
    Goodman SN. 1993. p values, hypothesis tests, and likelihood: Implications for epidemiology of a neglected historical debate. Am J Epidemiol 137: 485496.
  • 3
    Sterne JAC, Davey Smith G. 2001. Sifting the evidence—What's wrong with significance tests? BMJ 322: 226230.
  • 4
    Wacholder S, Chanock S, Garcia-Closas M, El Ghormli L, Rothman N. 2004. Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: An approach for molecular epidemiology studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 96: 434442.
  • 5
    Ioannidis JPA. 2005. Why most published research findings are false. Public Library of Science Medicine 2: e124e126.
  • 6
    Ioannidis JPA, Trikalinos TA. 2005. Early extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: The Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol 58: 543549.
  • 7
    Altman M. 2004. Statistical significance, path dependency, and the culture of journal publication. The Journal of Socio-Economics 33: 651663.
  • 8
    McCloskey DN. 1995. The insignificance of statistical significance. Am Sci 272: 3233.
  • 9
    Ziliak ST, McCloskey DN. 2004. Significance redux. The Journal of Socio-Economics 33: 665675.
  • 10
    Cohen J. 1994. The earth is round (p < .05). Am Psychol 49: 9971003.
  • 11
    Cohen J. 1995. The earth is round (p < .05): Rejoinder. Am Psychol 50: 1104
  • 12
    Fidler F, Cumming G, Burgman M, Thomason N. 2004. Statistical reform in medicine, psychology, and ecology. The Journal of Socio-Economics 33: 615630.
  • 13
    Fidler F, Burgman MA, Cumming G, Buttrose R, Thomason N. 2006. Impact of criticism of null-hypothesis significance testing on statistical reporting practices in conservation biology. Conserv Biol 20: 15391544.
  • 14
    Hoenig JM, Heisey DM. 2001. The abuse of power: The pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis. The American Statistician 55: 16.
  • 15
    Crane M, Newman MC. 2000. What level of effect is a no observed effect? Environ Toxicol Chem 19: 516519.
  • 16
    Gigerenzer G. 2004. Mindless statistics. The Journal of Socio-Economics 33: 587606.
  • 17
    Fidler F, Thomason N, Cumming G, Finch S, Leeman J. 2004. Editors can lead researchers to confidence intervals, but can't make them think. Psychological Science 15: 119126.
    Direct Link:
  • 18
    Howson C, Urbach P. 1989. Scientific Reasoning. The Bayesian Approach. Open Court, La Salle, IL, USA.
  • 19
    Hacking I. 2001. An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • 20
    Pedhazur EJ, Pedhazur Schmelkin L. 1991. Measurement, Design, and Analysis. An Integrated Approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA.
  • 21
    Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB. 1997. Bayesian Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
  • 22
    Nakagawa S. 2004. A farewell to Bonferroni: The problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behav Ecol 15: 10441045.
  • 23
    Cohen J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA.
  • 24
    Van der Hoeven N. 1998. Power analysis for the NOEC: What is the probability of detecting small toxic effects on three different species using the appropriate standardized test protocols? Ecotoxicology 7: 355361.
  • 25
    Cumming G, Finch S. 2005. Inference by eye. Am Psychol 60: 170180.
  • 26
    Di Stefano J. 2004. A confidence interval approach to data analysis. For Ecol Manag 187: 173183.
  • 27
    Altman D, Machin D, Bryant TN, Gardner MJ. 2000. Statistics with Confidence: Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines, 2nd ed. British Medical Journal Books, London, UK.
  • 28
    SAS Institute. 2003. SAS Statistical Package, Ver 9.1. Cary, NC, USA.
  • 29
    Kraufvelin P. 1998. Model ecosystem replicability challenged by the “soft” reality of a hard bottom mesocosm. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 222: 247267.
  • 30
    Rizak SN, Hrudey SE. 2006. Misinterpretation of drinking water-quality monitoring data with implications for risk management. Environ Sci Technol 40: 52445250.