SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Baird SJS, Cohen J, Graham JD, Shlyakhter AI, Evans JS., 1996. Noncancer risk assessment: A probabalistic alternative to current practice. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 2: 79102.
  • Chen JJ, Chen Y-J, Rice G, Teuschler L, Hamernik K, Protzel A, Kodell RL., 2001. Using dose addition to estimate cumulative risks from exposures to multiple chemicals. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 34: 3541.
  • Consoli F, Allen D, Boustead I, Fava J, Franklin W, Jensen AA, De Oude N, Parrish R, Perriman R, Postlethwaite D, Quay B, Séguin J, Vigon B., 1993. Guidelines for life-cycle assessment: A “Code of Practice.” Pensacola (FL), USA: Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC). 79 p.
  • Crettaz P, Pennington D, Rhomberg L, Brand K, Jolliet O., 2002. Assessing human health response in life cycle assessment using ED10s and DALYs: Part 1—Cancer effects. Risk Analysis 22: 931946.
  • De Hollander AEM, Melse JM, Lebret E, Kramers PGN., 1999. An aggregate public health indicator to represent the impact of multiple environmental exposures. Epidemiology 10: 606617.
  • Dorne JLCM, Walton K, Renwick AG., 2003. Polymorphic CYP2C19 and N-acetylation: Human variability in kinetics and pathway-related uncertainty factors. Food Chem Toxicol 41: 225245.
  • Frischknecht R, Braunschweig A, Hofstetter P, Suter P., 2000. Human health damages due to ionizing radiation in life cycle impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20: 159189.
  • Gaddum JH., 1945. Lognormal distributions. Nature 156: 463466.
  • Gold LS., 2004. Carcinogenic Potency Database (CPDB). potency.berkeley.edu. Accessed 15 May 2004.
  • Gold LS, Zeiger E., 1997. Handbook of carcinogenic potency and genotoxicity databases. Boca Raton (FL), USA: CRC. 754 p.
  • Hattis D., 1996. Human interindividual variability in susceptibility to toxic effects: From annoying detail to central determinant of risk. Toxicology 111: 514.
  • Hattis D., 1997. Human variability in susceptibility: How big, how often, for what responses to what agents. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 4: 195208.
  • Hertwich EG, Jolliet O, Pennington D, Hauschild M, Schulze C, Krewitt W, Huijbregts M., 2002. Fate and exposure assessment in the life-cycle impact assessment of toxic chemicals. In: HAUdo de Haes, editor, Life-cycle impact assessment: Striving towards best practice. Pensacola (FL), USA: Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC). Ch. 4.
  • Hertwich EG, Mateles SF, Pease WS, McKone TE., 2001. Human toxicity potentials for life cycle assessment and toxics release inventory risk screening. Environ Toxicol Chem 20: 928939.
  • Hofstetter P., 1998. Perspectives in life cycle impact assessment: A structured approach to combine models of the technosphere, ecosphere and value-sphere. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. 484 p.
  • Hofstetter P, Hammitt JK., 2002. Selecting human health metrics for environmental decision-support tools. Risk Analysis 22: 965983.
  • Huijbregts MAJ, Gilijamse W, Ragas AMJ, Reijnders L., 2003. Evaluating uncertainty in environmental life-cycle assessment. A case study comparing two insulation options for a Dutch one-family dwelling. Environ Sci Technol 37: 26002608.
  • Huijbregts MAJ, Rombouts LJA, Ragas AMJ., 2004. Human-toxicological effect and damage factors for life cycle impact assessment of carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic chemicals. The Netherlands: Department of Environmental Studies, University of Nijmegen. Report 253.
  • Huijbregts MAJ, Struijs J, Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Hendriks AJ, Van de Meent D., 2005. Human population intake fraction and environmental fate factors of toxic pollutants. Chemosphere (forthcoming).
  • Huijbregts MAJ, Thissen U, Guinée JB, Jager T, Van de Meent D, Ragas AMJ, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Reijnders L., 2000. Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessment, I: Calculation of toxicity potentials for 181 substances with the nested multi-media fate, exposure and effects model USES-LCA. Chemosphere 41: 541573.
  • Huijbregts MAJ, Van de Meent D, Goedkoop M, Spriensma R., 2002. Ecotoxicological impacts in life cycle assessment. In: PosthumaL, SuterGWII, TraasTP, editors, Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology. Boca Raton (FL), USA: Lewis. p 421433.
  • [IARC] International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2004. Summaries and evaluations. www.inchem.org/pages/iarc.html. Accessed 17–23 May 2004.
  • [JMPR] Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues. 2004. Monographs and evaluations. www.inchem.org/pages/jmpr.html. Accessed 17–23 May 2004.
  • Jolliet O, Müller-Wenk R, Bare J, Brent A, Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Itsubo N, Peña C, Pennington D, Potting J, Rebitzer G, Steward M, Udo de Haes H, Weidema B., 2004. The LCIA midpoint-damage framework of the UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative. Int J LCA 9: 394404.
  • Klepper O, Bakker J, Traas TP, Van de Meent D., 1998. Mapping the potentially affected fraction (PAF) of species as a basis for comparison of ecotoxicological risks between substances and regions. J Hazard Mater 61: 337344.
  • Könemann WH, Pieters MN., 1996. Confusion of concepts in mixture toxicology. Food Chem Toxicol 34: 3541.
  • Krewski D, Gaylor DW, Soms AP, Szyszkowicz M., 1993. An overview of the report: Correlation between carcinogenic potency and the maximum tolerated dose: Implications for risk assessment. Risk Analysis 13: 383398.
  • Krewitt W, Pennington D, Olsen SI, Crettaz P, Jolliet O., 2002. Indicators for human toxicity in life cycle impact assessment. In: HAUdo de Haes, editor. Life-cycle impact assessment: striving toward best practice. Pensacola (FL), USA: Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC). Ch. 5.
  • Lu FC., 1995. A review of the acceptable daily intakes of pesticides assessed by WHO. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 21: 352364.
  • Murray CJL, Lopez AD., 1996a. The global burden of disease: A comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Global Burden of Disease and Injury Series, Vol I. Cambridge (MA), USA: Harvard University. 990 p.
  • Murray CJL, Lopez AD., 1996b. Global health statistics: A compendium of incidence, prevalence and mortality estimates for over 200 conditions. In: Global burden of disease and injury series, vol II. Cambridge (MA), USA: Harvard University. 906 p.
  • Naumann BD, Silverman KC, Dixit R, Faria EC, Sargent EV., 2001. Case studies of categorical data-derived adjustment factors. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 7: 61105.
  • Owens JW., 2002. Chemical toxicity indicators for human health: Case study for classification of chronic noncancer chemical hazards in life-cycle assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 21: 207225.
  • Pennington D, Crettaz P, Tauxe A, Rhomberg L, Brand K, Jolliet O., 2002. Assessing human health response in life cycle assessment using ED10s and DALYs: Part 2—Noncancer effects. Risk Analysis 22: 947963.
  • Pieters MN, Kramer HJ, Slob W., 1998. Evaluation of the uncertainty factor for subchronic-to-chronic extrapolation: Statistical analysis of toxicity data. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 27: 108111.
  • Plackett RL, Hewlett PS., 1952. Quantal responses to mixtures of poisons. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 14: 143163.
  • Renwick AG, Lazarus NR., 1998. Human variability and noncancer risk assessment—An analysis of thedefault uncertainty factor. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 27: 320.
  • Seed J, Brown RP, Olin SS, Foran JA., 1995. Chemical mixtures: Current riskassessment methodologies and future directions. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 22: 7694.
  • Slob W., 1994. Uncertainty analysis in multiplicative models. Risk Analysis 14: 571576.
  • Slob W, Pieters MN., 1998. A probabilistic approach for deriving acceptable human intake limits and human health risks from toxicological studies: General framework. Risk Analysis 18: 787798.
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2000. Benchmark dose technical guidance document. External review draft. Washington DC: USEPA. EPA 630/R-00/00.
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2004. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). www.epa.gov/iris. Accessed 16–31 May 2004.
  • Van de Meent D, Huijbregts MAJ., 2005. Calculating life-cycle assessment effect factors from potentially affected fraction-based ecotoxicological response functions. Environ Toxicol Chem 24: 15731578.
  • Vermeire T, Pieters M, Rennen M, Bos P., 2001. Probabalistic assessment factors for human health risk assessment—A practical guide. Bilthoven, The Netherlands: National Institute for Health and the Environment. Report 601516005.
  • Vermeire T, Stevenson H, Pieters MN, Rennen M, Slob W, Hakkert BC., 1999. Assessment factors for human health risk assessment: A discussion paper. Crit Rev Toxicol 29: 439490.
  • Vermeire TG, Van der Poel P, Van de Laar RTH, Roelfzema H., 1993. Estimation of consumer exposure to chemicals: Application of simple models. Sci Total Environ 136: 55176.
  • Wilkinson CF, Christoph GR, Julien E, Kelley JM, Kronenburg J, McCarthy, Reiss R., 2000. Assessing the risks of exposures to multiple chemicals with a common mechanism of toxicity: How to cumulate? Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 31: 3043.