SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aldenberg T, Jaworska JS., 2000. Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 46: 118.
  • Aldenberg T, Slob W., 1993. Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 25: 4863.
  • AllenHE, editor. 2002. Bioavailability of metals in terrestrial ecosystems. Pensacola (FL), USA: Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC). 158 p.
  • Bossuyt BTA, Muyssen BTA, Janssen CR., 2005. Relevance of generic and site-specific species sensitivity distributions in the current risk assessment procedures for copper and zinc. Environ Toxicol Chem 24: 470478.
  • Cleven RMFJ, Janus JA, Annema JA, Sloof W., 1992. Basis document Zink. Bilthoven, The Netherlands: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. RIVM Report 710401 019.
  • Edelman T., 1984. Achtergrondgehalten van een aantal anorganische en organische stoffen in de bodem van Nederland. Bilthoven, The Netherlands: RIVM. 85 p.
  • European Communities. 2003. Technical guidance document in support of commission directive 93/67/EEC on risk assessment for new notified substances and commission regulation (EC) No. 1488/94 on risk assessment for existing substances and directive 98/8/EC of the European parliament and of the council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. Part II. Technical Guidance Document, Luxembourg.
  • European Union. 2001. Risk assessment report zinc. Draft 2001.
  • Geladi P, Kowalski BR., 1986. Partial least-squares regression: A tutorial. Anal Chim Acta 185: 117.
  • Gezondheidsraad. 1988. Ecotoxicologische risico-evaluatie van stoffen. The Hague, The Netherlands. Publication 1988/28.
  • Impellitteri CA, Saxe JK, Cochran M, Janssen GM, Allen HE., 2003. Predicting the bioavailability of copper and zinc in soils: Modeling the partitioning of potentially bioavailable copper and zinc from soil solid to soil solution. Environ Toxicol Chem 22: 13801386.
  • Janus JA, Van Beelen P, Vaal A, Senhorst HAJ, Van de Guchte C., 1996. A further look at zinc. Bilthoven/Lelystad, The Netherlands: RIVM/RIZA. RIVM Report 601014 012/RIZA Report 96.038.
  • Slijkerman DME, Van Gestel CAM, Van Stralen NM., 2000. Conceptueel kader voor de afleiding van ecotoxicologische risicogrenzen voor essentiële metalen. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Instituut voor Ecologische Wetenschappen, Afdeling Dieroecologie. Report D00020.
  • Struijs J, Van de Meent D, Peijnenburg WJGM, Van den Hoop MAGT, Crommentuijn T., 1997. Added risk approach to derive maximum permissible concentrations for heavy metals: How to take into account the natural background levels? Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 37: 112118.
  • Van Straalen NM., 2002. Threshold models for species sensitivity distributions applied to aquatic riskassessmentforzinc. Environ Toxicol Pharm 11 (3–4): 167172.
  • Van Straalen NM, Denneman CAJ., 1989. Ecotoxicological evaluation of soil quality criteria: Threshold models for species sensitivity distributions applied to aquatic risk assessment for zinc. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 18: 241251.
  • Van Tilborg WJM., 1996. A further look at zinc refuted. Rozendaal, The Netherlands: VTBC. 45 p.
  • Wagner C, Løkke H., 1991. Estimation of ecotoxicological protection levels from NOEC toxicity data. Water Res 25: 12371242.