SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ankley GT, Schubauer-Berigan MK., 1995. Background and overview of current sediment toxicity identification evaluation procedures. J Aquat Ecosyst Health 4: 133149.
  • Apitz SE, Davis JW, Finkelstein K, Hohreiter DW, Hoke R, Jensen RH, Jersak J, Kirtay VJ, Mack EE, Magar VS, Moore D, Reible D, Stahl RG Jr., 2005. Assessing and managing contaminated sediments: Part I, developing an effective investigation and risk evaluation strategy. Integr Environ Assess Manag 1: 28.
  • Borgmann U, Norwood WP, Reynoldson TB, Rosa F., 2001. Identifying cause in sediment assessments: Bioavailability and the Sediment Quality Triad. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58: 950960.
  • Burgess RM., 2000. Characterizing and identifying toxicants in marine waters: A review of marine toxicity identification evaluations (TIEs). Int J Environ Pollut 13: 233.
  • Burton GA Jr, Chapman PM, Smith EP., 2002. Weight-of-evidence approaches for assessing ecosystem impairment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 8: 16571673.
  • [CCME] Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. 1996. A framework for ecological risk assessment: General guidance. Winnipeg (MN). EN 108–4–10–1996E.
  • Chapman PM., 1996. Presentation and interpretation of Sediment Quality Triad data. Ecotoxicology 5: 327339.
  • Chapman PM., 2002. Integrating toxicology and benthic ecology: Putting the eco back into ecotoxicology. Mar Pollut Bull 44: 715.
  • Chapman PM., 2005. Development of a Canada-Ontario decision-making framework for contaminated sediments in the great lakes (and elsewhere): Final report. North Vancouver, BC, Canada: EVS Environment Consultants-Golder Associates.
  • Chapman PM, Ho K, Munns W, Solomon K, Weinstein MP., 2002. Issues in sediment toxicity and ecological risk assessment. Mar Pollut Bull 44: 271278.
  • Chapman PM, McDonald BG, Lawrence GS., 2002. Weight of evidence frameworks for sediment quality and other assessments. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 8: 14891515.
  • Environment Canada. 1998. Biological test method: Reference method for determining acute lethality of sediment to marine or estuarine amphipods. Ottawa (ON). EPS 1/RM/35.
  • Environment Canada. 1999. Guidance document on the application and interpretation of single-species tests in environmental toxicology. Ottawa (ON). EPS 1/RM/34.
  • Environment Canada. 2002. Metal mining guidance document for aquatic environmental effects monitoring. Ottawa, (ON).
  • Freshman JS, Menzie CA., 1996. Two wildlife exposure models to assess impacts at the individual and population levels and the efficacy of remedial actions. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 3: 481498.
  • Grapentine L, Anderson J, Boyd D, Burton GA Jr, DeBarros C, Johnson G, Marvin C, Milani D, Painter S, Pascoe T, Reynoldson T, Richman L, Solomon K, Chapman PM., 2002. A decision-making framework for sediment assessment developed for the Great Lakes. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 8: 16411655.
  • Grapentine L, Milani D, Mackay S., 2003a. A study of the bioavailability of mercury and the potential for biomagnification from sediment in the St. Lawrence River (Cornwall) Area of Concern. Burlington (ON), Canada: National Water Research Institute, Environment Canada.
  • Grapentine L, Milani D, Mackay S., 2003b. A study of the bioavailability of mercury and the potential for biomagnification from sediment in Jellico Cove, Peninsula Harbour. Burlington (ON), Canada: National Water Research Institute, Environment Canada.
  • Ingersoll CG, MacDonald DD., 2002. Guidance manual to support the assessment of contaminated sediments in freshwater ecosystems, Volume III: Interpretation of the results of sediment quality investigations. Chicago, (IL): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Great Lakes National Program. EPA 905-B02–001-C.
  • Jaagumagi R, Persaud D., 1996. An integrated approach to the evaluation and management of contaminated sediments. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Standards Development Branch, Environmental Standards Section.
  • Jarvinen AW, Ankley GT., 1999. Linkage of effects to tissue residues: Development of a comprehensive database for aquatic organisms exposed to inorganic and organic chemicals. Pensacola (FL), USA: Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry.
  • Krantzberg G, Reynoldson T, Jaagumagi R, Painter S, Boyd D, Bedard D, Pawson T., 2000. SEDS: Setting environmental decisions for sediment management. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 3: 387396.
  • MacDonald DD, Ingersoll CG., 2002a. A guidance manual to support the assessment of contaminated sediments in freshwater ecosystems, Vol I: An ecosystem-based framework for assessing and managing contaminated sediments. Chicago (IL): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Great Lakes National Program. EPA 905-B02–001-A.
  • MacDonald DD, Ingersoll CG., 2002b. Guidance manual to support the assessment of contaminated sediments in freshwater ecosystems. Volume II: Design and implementation of sediment quality investigations. Chicago (IL): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Great Lakes National Program. EPA 905-B02–001-B.
  • Mearns AJ, Swartz RC, Cummins JM, Dinnel PA, Plesha P, Chapman PM., 1986. Inter-laboratory comparison of a sediment toxicity test using the marine amphipod, Rhepoxynius abronius. Mar Environ Res 19: 1337.
  • O'Connor TP., 2004. The sediment quality guideline, ERL, is not a chemical concentration atthe threshold of sediment toxicity. Mar Pollut Bull 49: 383385.
  • Porebski LM, Doe KG, Zajdlik BA, Lee D, Pocklington P, Osborne JM., 1999. Evaluating the techniques for a tiered testing approach to dredged sediment assessment—A study over a metal concentration gradient. Environ Toxicol Chem 18: 26002610.
  • Power EA, Boumphrey RS., 2004. International trends in bioassay use for effluent management. Ecotoxicology 13: 377398.
  • Reynoldson TB, Smith EP, Bailer AJ., 2002. A comparison of three weight-of-evidence approaches for integrating sediment contamination data within and across lines of evidence. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 8: 16131624.
  • Reynoldson TB, Thompson SP, Milani D., 2002. Integrating multiple toxicological endpoints in a decision-making framework for contaminated sediments. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 8: 15691584.
  • Simpson SL, Batley GE, Stauber JL, King CK, Chapman JC, Hyne RV, Gale SA, Roach AC, Maher WA, Chariton AA., 2005. Handbook for sediment quality assessment. Canberra, Australia: Environmental Trust.
  • Suter GW II., 1996. Risk characterization for ecological risk assessment of contaminated sites. Oak Ridge (TN): U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management. ES/ER/TM-20.
  • Suter GW II, Norton SB, Cormier SM., 2002. A methodology for inferring the causes of observed impairments in aquatic ecosystems. Environ Toxicol Chem 21: 11011111.
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. EPA's contaminated sediment management strategy. Washington DC: USEPA, Office of Water. EPA823-R-98–001.
  • [USEPA and USACE] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1998. Evaluation of dredged material proposed for discharge in waters of the United States—Testing manual. Washington DC: USEPA, USACE. EPA 823-B-98–004.
  • [WAC] Washington Administrative Code. 1995. Sediment management standards. Title 173, Chapter 204. Olympia (WA), USA: Department of Ecology.
  • Wenning RJ, Ingersoll CG, editors. 2002. Use of sediment quality guidelines and related tools for the assessment of contaminated sediments: Executive summary booklet of a Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) Pellston Workshop. Pensacola (FL), USA: SETAC.
  • Wong C., 2004. Evaluating the ecological relevance of sediment quality guidelines. Poster Presentation at the 31 st Annual Aquatic Toxicity Workshop, 2004 Oct 24–27; Charlottetown (Prince Edward Island), Canada.