SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • [ANZECC–ARMCANZ] Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council–Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand. 2000. Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality: Volume 1: The guidelines. Canberra, Australia: ANZECC-ARMCANZ.
  • Apitz SE. 1998. Streamlining contaminated sediment management: The use of advanced sediment characterization: Preliminary results. Water Sci Technol 37: 435442.
  • Apitz SE, Power B. 2002. From risk assessment to sediment management: An international perspective. J Soils Sediments 2: 6166.
  • Apitz SE, White S. 2003. A conceptual framework for river-basin-scale sediment management. J Soils Sediments 3: 132138.
  • Apitz SE, Davis JW, Finkelstein K, Hohreiter DW, Hoke R, Jensen RH, Jersak J, Kirtay VJ, Mack EE, Magar V, Moore DW, Reible D, Stahl RG, Jr. 2005. Assessing and managing contaminated sediments: Part II: Evaluating risk and monitoring sediment remedy effectiveness. Integ Environ Assess Manag 1 (online only): e1e14.
  • [ASTM] American Society for Testing and Materials. 1995. Standard guide for developing conceptual site models for contaminated sites. In: Annual book of ASTM standards, Vol. 04.08. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM. E 168995.
  • Barabas N, Goovaerts P, Adriaens P. 2004. Modified polytopic vector analysis to identify and quantify a dioxin dechlorination signature in sediments. 1. Theory. Environ Sci Technol 15; 38 (6): 18131820.
  • Boothman WS, Hansen DJ, Berry WJ, Robson DL, Helmstetter A, Corbin JM, Pratt SD. 2001. Biological response to variation of acid-volatile sulfides and metals in field-exposed spiked sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem 20: 26472.
  • Brenner RC, Magar VS, Ickes JA, Abbott JE, Stout SA, Crecelius EA, Bingler L. 2001. monitored natural recovery of PAH-contaminated sediments at the Wyckoff/Eagle Harbor superfund site. Environ Sci Technol 36: 26052613.
  • Brenner RC, Magar VS, Ickes JA, Foote EA, Abbott JE, Bingler LS, Crecelius EA. 2004. Long-term recovery of PCB-contaminated surface sediments at the Sangamo-Weston Twelve-mile Creek/Lake Hartwell superfund site. Environ Sci Technol 38: 23282337.
  • Chapman PM. 1989. Current approaches to developing sediment quality criteria. Environ Toxicol Chem 8: 589599.
  • Chapman PM. 1996. Presentation and interpretation of sediment quality triad data. Ecotoxicology 5: 327339.
  • Chapman PM, Birge WJ, Adams WJ, Barrick R, Bott TL, Burton A, Collier TK, Cumberland HL, Douglas WS, Johnson LL, Luther GW, O'Connor T, Page DS, Sibly P, Standley LL, Wenning RJ. 2001. Learned discourse: Sediment quality values (SQVs): Challenges and recommendations. SETAC Globe 2: 2426.
  • [CNO] Chief of Naval Operations. 1999. Letter 5090 Ser N453E/9U595355 dated 5 Apr 1999; Navy Policy for Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments.
  • Coates JA, Delfino JJ. 1993. Sources of uncertainty in the application of the equilibrium partitioning approach to sediment quality assessment. Water Sci Technol 28: 317328.
  • Crawford DW, Bonnievie NL, Wenning RJ. 1995. Sources of pollution and sediment contamination in Newark Bay, New Jersey. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 30: 85100.
  • Crommentuijn T, Sijm D, de Bruijn J, van den Hoop M, van Leeuwen K, van de Plassche E. 2000. Maximum permissible and negligible concentrations for metals and metalloids in the Netherlands, taking into account background concentrations. J Environ Manag 60: 121143.
  • De Bartolomeo A, Poletti L, Sanchini G, Sebastiani B, Morozzi G. 2004. Relationship among parameters of lake polluted sediments evaluated by multi-variate statistical analysis. Chemosphere 55: 13231329.
  • den Besten PJ, de Deckere E, Babut MP, Power B, DelValls TA, Zago C, Oen AMP, Heise S. 2003. Biological effects-based sediment quality in ecological risk assessment for European waters. J Soils Sediments 3: 144162.
  • Germano JD. 1999. Ecology, statistics and the art of misdiagnosis: The need for a paradigm shift. Environ Rev 7: 167190.
  • Hunt JW, Anderson BS, Phillips BM, Newman J, Tjeerdema RS, Fairey R, Puckett HM, Stephenson M, Smith RW, Wilson CJ, Taberski KM. 2001. Evaluation and use of sediment toxicity reference sites for statistical comparisons in regional assessments. Environ Toxicol Chem 20: 12661275.
  • Johnston RK, Munns WR Jr, Tyler PL, Marajh-Whittemore P, Finkelstein K, Munny K, Short FT, Melville A, Hahn SP. 2002. Weighing the evidence of ecological risk from chemical contamination in the estuarine environment adjacent to the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Kittery, Maine, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 21: 182194.
  • Levin SA. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 19431967.
  • Long ER, MacDonald DD, Smith SL, Calder FD. 1995. Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments. J Environ Manag 19: 8197.
  • MacDonald DD, Ingersoll CG. 2002. A guidance manual to support the assessment of contaminated sediments in freshwater ecosystems. Volume I: An ecosystem-based framework for assessing and managing contaminated sediments. Chicago (IL): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Great Lakes National Program Office.
  • Morrison RD. 2000. Environmental forensics, principles and applications. Boca Raton (FL), USA: CRC.
  • [NRC] National Research Council. 1997. Contaminated sediments in ports and waterways: Cleanup strategies and technologies. Washington DC: National Academy.
  • [NRC] National Research Council. 2001. A risk-management strategy for PCB-contaminated sediments. Washington DC: National Academy.
  • [NRC] National Research Council. 2003. Bioavailability of contaminants in soils and sediments: Processes, tools and applications. Washington DC: National Academy.
  • Page DS, Boehm PD, Douglas GS, Bence AE. 1995. Identification of hydrocarbon sources in the benthic sediments of Prince William Sound and the Gulf of Alaska following the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. In: WellsPG, ButlerJN, HughesJS, editors. Exxon Valdez oil spill: Fate and effects in Alaskan waters. West Conshohocken (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials. STP 1219. p 4183.
  • Reible DD, Jensen RH, Bentley SJ, Dannel MB, DePinto JV, Dyer JA, Farley KJ, Garcia MH, Glaser D, Hamrick JM, Lick WJ, Pastorok RA, Schwer RF, Ziegler CK. 2004. The role of modeling in managing contaminated sediments. In: ChienCC, MedinaMA, PinderGF, ReibleDD, SleepBE, ZhengC, editors. Contaminated groundwater and sediment. Boca Raton (FL), USA: Lewis. p 61106.
  • Simpson SL. 2001. A rapid screening method for acid-volatile sulfide in sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem 20: 26572661.
  • [SETAC] Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 1997. Technical issue paper: Ecological risk assessment. Pensacola (FL), USA: SETAC. 4 p.
  • Stahl RG, Bachman R, Barton AL, Clark JR, de Fur PL, Ells SJ, Pittinger CA, Slimak MW, Wentsel RS. 2001. Risk management: Ecological risk-based decision making. Pensacola (FL), USA: SETAC. 192 p.
  • Stout SA, Magar VS, Uhler RM, Ickes J, Abbott J, Brenner R. 2001. Characterization of naturally-occurring and anthropogenic PAHs in urban sediments—Wycoff/Eagle Harbor superfund site. J Env Forensics 2: 287300.
  • Stout SA, Leather JM, Corl WE III. 2003. A user's guide for determining the sources of Contaminants in sediments: A demonstration study: Sources of PAH in sediments in the vicinity of the Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Elizabeth River, Norfolk, Virginia. U.S. Navy-Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center. Technical report 1907. http://www.spawar.navy.mil/sti/publications/pubs/tr/1907/tr1907cond.pdf. Accessed 20 Jul 2004.
  • Tannenbaum LV. 2002. Learned discourses: Terrestrial ecological risk assessment: Are we missing the forest for the trees? SETAC Globe 1: 3839.
  • Tannenbaum LV. 2003. Can ecological receptors really be at risk? Hum Ecol Risk Assess 9: 513.
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1993. Data quality objectives for superfund, interim final guidance. Washington DC: USEPA. EPA 540-R-93–071.
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1997. Ecological risk assessment guidance for superfund: Process for designing and conducting ecological risk assessments. Washington DC: USEPA. EPA 540-R-97–006.
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2000. Data quality objectives process for hazardous waste site investigations, EPA QA/G-4HW, Final. Washington DC: USEPA. EPA/600/R-00/007.
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2001. Draft report on the incidence and severity of sediment contamination in surface waters of the United States, national sediment quality survey. Washington DC: USEPA. EPA-823-F-01–031.
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2002a. Contaminated sediment remediation guidance for hazardous waste sites. Washington DC: USEPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. OSWER 9355.0–85.
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2002b. Principles for managing contaminated sediment risks at hazardous waste sites. Washington DC: USEPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. OSWER 9285.6–08.
  • Wenning RJ, Ingersoll CG. 2002. Summary of the SETAC Pellston Workshop on use of sediment quality guidelines and related tools for the assessment of contaminated sediments: Executive summary booklet. Pensacola (FL),