SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • [ACC] American Chemistry Council. 2003. Comments to the Office of Management and Budget draft 2003 report to Congress on the costs and benefits of federal regulations, 68 FR 5492. Arlington (VA), USA: ACC.
  • Barton AL. 2001. Deciding what resources to protect and setting objectives. In: StahlRG, BachmanRA, BartonAL, ClarkJR, deFurPL, EllsSJ, PittingerCA, SlimakMW, WentselRS, editors. Risk management: Ecological risk-based decision-making. Pensacola (FL), USA: SETAC. p 4156.
  • [CENR] Committee on Environment and Natural Resources. 1999. Ecological risk assessment in the federal government. Washington DC: National Science and Technology Council. CENR 5–99/001.
  • [EOP] Executive Office of the President of the United States. 1991. Regulatory program of the United States government. Current regulatory issues in risk assessment and risk management. Washington DC: EOP.
  • Foran JA, Ferenc SA. 1999. Multiple stressors in ecological risk and impact assessment. Pensacola (FL), USA: SETAC.
  • Foreman CH. 2000. Environmental justice and risk assessment: The uneasy relationship. Human Ecol Risk Assess 6: 549554.
  • [OMB] Office of Management and Budget. 2003. Informing regulatory decisions: 2003 report to Congress on the costs and benefits of federal regulations and unfunded mandates on state, local and tribal entities. Washington DC: Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Analysis.
  • Pittinger CA, Stahl RG, Clark JR. 2001. Managing ecological risk issues in a corporate context. In: StahlRG, BachmanR, ClarkJR, deFurPL, EllsSJ, PittingerCA, SlimakMW, WentselRS, editors. Risk management: Ecological risk-based decision making. Pensacola (FL), USA: SETAC. p 137148.
  • Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management. 1997. Risk assessment and risk management in regulatory decisionmaking. Vol 2. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Stahl RG, Bachman R, Barton AL, Clark JR, deFur PL, Ells SJ, Pittinger CA, Slimak MW, Wentsel RS. 2001. Risk management: Ecological risk-based decision making. Pensacola (FL), USA: SETAC.
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1992. Framework for ecological risk assessment. Washington DC: USEPA Risk Assessment Forum. EPA 630/R-92/001.
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1995a. Ecological risk: Aprimer for risk managers. Washington DC: USEPA Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances. EPA 734-R-95–001, 136.
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1995b. Use of benchmark dose approach in health risk assessment. Washington DC: USEPA Risk Assessment Forum. EPA 630/R-94/007.
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1997a. Ecological risk assessment guidance for Superfund: Process for designing and conducting ecological risk assessments. Washington DC: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. EPA 540-R97–006.
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1997b. Priorities for ecological protection: An initial list and discussion document for EPA. Washington DC: USEPA Office of Research and Development. EPA 600/S-97–002.
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. Washington DC: Office of Research and Development. EPA 630/R-95/001F.
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1999a. Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment, review draft. Washington DC: USEPA. NCEA-F-0644.
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1999b. Issuance of final guidance: Ecological risk assessment and risk management principles for Superfund sites. Washington DC: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. OSWER Directive 9285.7–28P
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2001. Risk assessment guidance for Superfund. Vol 3 (Part A, Process for conducting probabilistic risk assessment). Washington DC: Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, USEPA.
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2004. An examination of EPA risk assessment principles and practices. Washington DC: Office of the Science Advisor, USEPA.