SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Alexander M. 2000. Aging, bioavailability, and overestimation of risk from environmental pollutants. Environ Sci Technol 34: 42594265.
  • Ankley GT. 1996. Evaluation of metal/acid-volatile sulfide relationships in the prediction of metal bioaccumulation by benthic marcoinvertebrates. Environ Toxicol Chem 15: 21382146.
  • Barnthouse LB, Munns WR, Sorensen MT., Population-level ecological risk assessment. Pensacola (FL), USA: SETAC (forthcoming).
  • Boonstra R, Bowman L. 2003. Demography of short-tailed shrew populations living on polychlorinated biphenyl-contaminated sites. Environ Toxicol Chem 22: 13941403.
  • Calder III WA. 1984. Size, function and life history. Cambridge (MA), USA: Harvard University Press.
  • Davidson IWF, Parker JC, Beliles RP. 1986. Biological basis of extrapolation among mammalian species. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 6: 211237.
  • [DTSC] California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 1999. HERD ecological risk assessment note. Sacramento (CA), USA: DTSC, Human and Ecological Risk Division. HERD ERA Note nr 2.
  • Fontenot LW, Ayers TA, Day CH, Ellingston SB, Sager SL. 1998. Ecological risk assessment of endocrine-disrupting chemicals to amphibians. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Eighth Symposium on Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment: Standardization of Biomarkers for Endocrine Disruption and Environmental Assessment; 1998 Apr 20–22; Atlanta, GA. West Conshohocken (PA), USA: ASTM.
  • Fontenot LW, Noblet GP, Akins JM, Stephens MD, Cobb GP. 2000. Bioaccumulation of polychlorinated biphenyls in ranid frogs and northern water snakes from a hazardous waste site and a contaminated watershed. Chemosphere 40: 803809.
  • Ghosh U, Zimmerman J, Luthy R. 2003. PCB and PAH speciation among particle types in contaminated harbor sediments and effects on PAH bioavailability. Environ Sci Technol 37: 22092217.
  • Hope BK. 2000. Generating probabilistic spatially explicit individual and population exposure estimates for ecological risk assessments. Risk Anal 20: 573589.
  • Kim SD, Ma H, Allen H, Cha D. 1999. Influence of dissolved organic matter on the toxicity of copper to Ceriodaphnia dubia: Effect of complexation kinetics. Environ Toxicol Chem 18: 24332437.
  • Landis W, McLaughlin J. 2000. Design criteria and derivation of indicators for ecological position, direction, and risk. Environ Toxicol Chem 19: 10591065.
  • Maltby L, Kedwards TJ, Forbes VE, Grasman K, Kammenga JE, Munns WR, Ringwood AH, Weis JS, Wood SN. 2001. Linking individual-level responses and population-level consequences. In: BairdDJ, BurtonGA, editors. Ecological variability: Separating natural from anthropogenic causes of ecosystem impairment. Pensacola (FL), USA: SETAC. p 2782.
  • McGee BL, Fisher DJ, Yonkos LT, Ziegler GP, Turley S. 1999. Assessment of sediment contamination, acute toxicity and population viability of the estuarine amphipod Leptocheirus Plumulosus in Baltimore Harbor, Maryland, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 18: 21512160.
  • Meyer JN, DiGiuliuo RT. 2003. Heritable adaptation and fitness costs in killifish (Fundulus beteroclitus) inhabiting a polluted estuary. Ecol Appl 13: 490503.
  • Mineau P, Collins PT, Baril A. 1996. On the use of scaling factors to improve interspecies extrapolation of acute toxicity in birds. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 24: 2429.
  • Nacci D, Coiro L, Champlin D, Jayaraman S, McKinney R, Gleason TR, Munns WR, Specker JL, Cooper KR. 1999. Adaptations of wild populations of the estuarine fish Fundulus heteroclitus to persistent environmental contaminants. Mar Biol 134: 917.
  • Pastorok R, Bartell S, Ferso S, Ginzburg L. 2002. Ecological modeling in risk assessment: Chemical effects on populations, ecosystems, and landscapes. Boca Raton (FL), USA: Lewis.
  • Peters RH. 1983. The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge (MA), USA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sample BE, Arenal CA. 1999. Allometric models for interspecies extrapolation of wildlife toxicity data. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 62: 653663.
  • Sample BE, Opresko DM, Suter GW II. 1996. Toxicological benchmarks for wildlife: 1996 revision. Oakridge (TN): Risk Assessment Program Health Sciences Research Division, U.S. Department of Energy. ES/ER/TM-86/R3.
  • Simon TW. 2000. Amended guidance on ecological risk assessment at military bases: Process considerations, timing of activities, and inclusion of stakeholders. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4. 4WD-OTS.
  • Sorensen MT, Gala WR, Margolin JA. 2004. Approaches to ecological risk characterization and management: selecting the right tools for the job. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 10: 245269.
  • Suter GW. 1993. Ecological risk assessment. Boca Raton (FL), USA: Lewis.
  • Tannenbaum L. 2003. Can ecological receptors really be at risk? Hum Ecol Risk Assess 9: 513.
  • Tannenbaum L, Johnson M, Bazar M. 2003. Application of the hazard quotient in remedial decisions: A comparison of human and ecological risk assessments. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 9: 387401.
  • Urban DJ, Cook NJ. 1986. Hazard evaluation division standard evaluation procedure. Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA 540/9–85–001.
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1993. Wildlife exposure factors handbook. Washington DC: USEPA. EPA 600/R-93/187.
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1997. Ecological risk assessment guidance for Superfund: Process for designing and conducting ecological risk assessments. Washington DC: USEPA. EPA 540-R97–006. OS-WER 9285.7–25.
  • [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2004. An examination of EPA risk assessment principles and practices. Washington DC: USEPA. EPA 100/B-04/001.
  • Woodbury P. 2003. Dos and don'ts of spatially explicit ecological risk assessments. Environ Toxicol Chem 22: 977982.