Get access

Technical issues affecting the implementation of US Environmental Protection Agency's proposed fish tissue-based aquatic criterion for selenium

Authors

  • A Dennis Lemly,

    Corresponding author
    1. US Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Fisheries Research Unit, 1650 Ramble Road, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060
    • US Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Fisheries Research Unit, 1650 Ramble Road, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Joseph P Skorupa

    1. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Environmental Quality, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 322, Arlington, Virginia 22203
    Search for more papers by this author

  • Published on the Web 8/22/2007.

Abstract

The US Environmental Protection Agency is developing a national water quality criterion for selenium that is based on concentrations of the element in fish tissue. Although this approach offers advantages over the current water-based regulations, it also presents new challenges with respect to implementation. A comprehensive protocol that answers the “what, where, and when” is essential with the new tissue-based approach in order to ensure proper acquisition of data that apply to the criterion. Dischargers will need to understand selenium transport, cycling, and bioaccumulation in order to effectively monitor for the criterion and, if necessary, develop site-specific standards. This paper discusses 11 key issues that affect the implementation of a tissue-based criterion, ranging from the selection of fish species to the importance of hydrological units in the sampling design. It also outlines a strategy that incorporates both water column and tissue-based approaches. A national generic safety-net water criterion could be combined with a fish tissue–based criterion for site-specific implementation. For the majority of waters nationwide, National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permitting and other activities associated with the Clean Water Act could continue without the increased expense of sampling and interpreting biological materials. Dischargers would do biotic sampling intermittently (not a routine monitoring burden) on fish tissue relative to the fish tissue criterion. Only when the fish tissue criterion is exceeded would a full site-specific analysis including development of intermedia translation factors be necessary.

Ancillary