SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Bailer AJ, Oris JT. 1997. Estimating inhibition concentrations for different response scales using generalized linear models. Environ Toxicol Chem 16: 15541559.
  • Baird DJ, Van den Brink PJ. 2007. Using biological traits to predict species sensitivity to toxic substances. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 67: 296301.
  • Baron MG, Wharton SR. 2005. Survey of methodologies for developing media screening values for ecological risk assessment. Integr Environ Assess Manag 1: 320332.
  • Caux P-Y, Moore DJR. 1997. A spreadsheet program for estimating low toxic effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 16: 802806.
  • Chapman PM, Caldwell RS, Chapman PF. 1996. A warning: NOECs are inappropriate for regulatory use. Environ Toxicol Chem 15: 7779.
  • Chapman PM, Fairbrother A, Brown D. 1998. A critical evaluation of safety (uncertainty) factors for ecological risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 17: 99108.
  • Cook RS, Trainer DO. 1966. Experimental lead poisoning of Canada geese. J Wildlife Manage 30: 18.
  • Duke LD, Taggart M. 2000. Uncertainty factors in screening ecological risk assessments. Environ Toxicol Chem 19: 16681680.
  • Fairbrother A. 2001. Putting the impacts of environmental contamination in perspective. In: ShoreRE, RattnerBA, editors. Ecotoxicology of wild mammals. Ecological and environmental toxicology series. Chichester (UK): John Wiley. p 671689.
  • Freirich EJ, Gehan EA, Ral DP, Schmidt LH, Skipper HE. 1966. Quantitative comparison of toxicity of anticancer agents in mouse, rat, hamster, dog, monkey, and man. Cancer Chemoth Rep 50: 219244.
  • Gallegos P, Lutz J, Markwiese J, Ryti R, Mirenda R. 2007. Wildlife ecological screening levels for inhalation of volatile organic chemicals. Environ Toxicol Chem 26: 12991303.
  • Hill WF. 1994. Acute and subacute toxicology in evaluation of pesticide hazard in avian wildlife. In: KendallRJ, LacherTEJr, editors. Wildlife toxicology and population modeling: Integrated studies of agroecosystems. Pensacola (FL): SETAC. p 207226.
  • Hoekstra JA, Van Ewijk PH. 1993. Alternatives of the NOEL. Environ Toxicol Chem 12: 187194.
  • Hope BK. 2009. Will there ever be a role for risk assessments? Human Ecol Risk Assess 15: 16.
  • Jacobs TL, Vesilind PA. 1992. Probabilistic environmental risk of hazardous materials. J Environ Eng 118: 878889.
  • Johnson MS, Jay GG. 1999. Development and derivation of inhalation benchmark values for wildlife: An application to identify ecological risk for the Anniston Chemical Disposal Facility Incinerator, Anniston, AL. Health Effects Research Study 87-1299-99. Health Effects Research Program, Toxicology Directorate, US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.
  • Johnson MS, McFarland CA, Quinn MJ Jr, Bazar MA, Talent L, Hawkins A, Porter R, Gogal RM Jr. 2007. Derivation of toxicity data for munition compounds to support toxicity reference value derivations for wildlife. Partners in Environmental Technology Technical Symposium, SERDP/ESTCP Meeting, Washington, DC: Nov. 2007.
  • Johnson MS, Quinn MJ Jr, Bazar MA, Gust KA, Escalon BL, Perkins EJ. 2007. Subacute toxicity of oral 2,6-Dinitrotoluene and 1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) exposure to the Northern Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus). Environ Toxicol Chem 26: 14811487.
  • Johnson MS, Wickwire WT, Quinn MJ, Ziolkowski DJ Jr, Burmistrov D, Menzie CA, Geraghty C, Minnich M, Parsons PJ. 2007. Are songbirds at risk from lead at small arms ranges? An application of the spatially explicit exposure model (SEEM). Environ Toxicol Chem 26: 22152225.
  • Kapustka L. 2008. Limitations of the current practices used to perform ecological risk assessment. Integr Environ Assess Manag 4: 290298.
  • Kelce WR, Stone CR, Laws SC, Gray EL, Kemppainen JA, Wilson EM. 1996. Persistent DDT metabolite p,p′-DDE is a potent androgen receptor antagonist. Obstet Gynecol Surv 51: 111114.
  • Kerr DR, Meador JP. 1996. Modeling dose response using generalized linear models. Environ Toxicol Chem 15: 395401.
  • Kortenkamp A. 2007. Ten years of mixing cocktails: A review of combination effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Environ Health Perspect 115: 98105.
  • Länge R, Hutchinson TH, Scholz N, Solbé J. 1998. Analysis of the ECETOC aquatic toxicity (EAT) database II: Comparison of acute to chronic ratios for various aquatic organisms and chemical substances. Chemosphere 36: 115127.
  • Laskowski R. 1995. Some good reasons to ban the use of NOEC, LOEC and related concepts in ecotoxicology. Oikos 73: 140144.
  • Lundholm CE. 1997. DDE-induced eggshell thinning in birds: Effects of p,p′-DDE on the calcium and prostaglandin metabolism of the eggshell gland. Comp Biochem Phys C 118: 113128.
  • Luttik R, Aldenberg T. 1997. Extrapolation factors for small samples of pesticide toxicity data: Special focus on LD50 values for birds and mammals. Environ Toxicol Chem 16: 17851788.
  • McDonald BG, Wilcockson JB. 2003. Improving the use of toxicity reference values in wildlife food chain modeling and ecological risk assessment. Human Ecol Risk Assess 9: 15851594.
  • Moore DRJ, Caux P-Y. 1997. Estimating low toxic effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 16: 794801.
  • Moore DRJ, Breton RL, Lloyd K. 1997. The effects of hexachlorobenzene on mink in the Canadian environment: An ecological risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 16: 10421050.
  • Moore DRJ, Sample BE, Suter II GW, Parkhurst BR, Teed RS. 1999. A probabilistic risk assessment of the effects of methylmercury and PCBs on mink and kingfishers along East Fork Poplar Creek, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 18: 29412953.
  • Moore DRJ, Teed RS, Richardson GM. 2003. Derivation of ambient water quality criterion for mercury: Taking account of site-specific conditions. Environ Toxicol Chem 22: 30693080.
  • Moore DRJ, Purbrick SI, Teed RS, Thompson RP. 2006. Refined wildlife risk assessment for Aldicarb. Report prepared on behalf of Bayer Crop Science and submitted to US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  • Newman MC, Ownby DR, Mézin LCA, Powell DC, Christensen TRL, Lerberg SB, Anderson B-A. 2000. Applying species-sensitivity distributions in ecological risk assessment: Assumptions of distribution type and sufficient number of species. Environ Toxicol Chem 19: 508515.
  • [OECD] Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1998. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment Number 10: Report of the OECD workshop on Statistical Analysis of Aquatic Toxicity Data. ENV/MC/CHEM(98)18. Environmental Health and Safety Publications, Paris, France.
  • Opresko DM, Sample BE, Suter GW Jr. 1994. Toxicological benchmarks for wildlife: 1994 revision. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oakridge (TN). ES/ER/TM-86/R1.
  • Pain DJ. 1996. Lead in waterfowl. In: BeyerWN, HeinzGH, Redmon-NorwoodAW, editors. Environmental contaminants in wildlife. Boca Raton (FL): Lewis. p 251279.
  • Raimondo S, Mineau P, Barron MG. 2007. Estimation of chemical toxicity to wildlife species using interspecies correlation models. Environ Sci Technol 41: 58885894.
  • Sample BE, Arenal CA. 1999. Allometric models for interspecies extrapolation of wildlife toxicity data. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 62: 653663.
  • Sample BE, Opresko DM, Suter GW Jr. 1996. Toxicological Benchmarks for Wildlife: 1996 Revision. ES/ER/TM-86/R3. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge (TN).
  • Solomon K, Giesy J, Jones P. 2000. Probabilistic risk assessment of agrochemicals in the environment. Crop Prot 19: 649655.
  • St. Omer VV. 1970. Chronic and acute toxicity of the chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides in mammals and birds. Canadian Vet J 11: 215226.
  • Suter GW Jr. 2007. Ecological risk assessment 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC. 643 p.
  • Suter GW Jr, Rosen AE. 1988. Comparative toxicology for risk assessment of marine fishes and crustaceans. Environ Sci Technol 22: 548556.
  • Suter II GW, Rosen AE, Linder E. 1986. In: BarnthouseLW, SuterII GW, editors. User's manual for ecological risk analysis. Oak Ridge (TN): Oak Ridge National Laboratory. ORNL-6251. p 4981.
  • Suter II GW, Rodier DJ, Schwenk S, Troyer MW, Tyler PL, Urban DJ, Wellman MC, Wharton S. 2004. The US Environmental Protection Agency's generic ecological assessment endpoints. Human Ecol Risk Assess 10: 967982.
  • [USACHPPM] US Army Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Medicine. 2000. Standard practice for wildlife toxicity reference values. Technical Guide No. 254.
  • [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels. Washington (DC): USEPA. OSWER Directive 9285.7-55.
  • Wayland M, Casey R, Woodsworth E. 2007. A dietary assessment of selenium risk to aquatic birds on a coal mine affected stream in Alberta, Canada. Human Ecol Risk Assess 13: 823842.