1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Anatomy of the Human Epididymis
  4. Histology of the Epididymal Tubule
  5. Dysgenesis/Atresia of the Epididymis
  6. Epididymal Functions
  7. Conclusion
  8. References

ABSTRACT: The epididymis consists of a single, highly coiled and convoluted tubule that Antoine De Graaf, the famous 17th-century anatomist, likened to a thread thickening to a string. The uncoiled tubule is several meters long and sperm in transit through it become functionally mature under the under the influence of the tubule lumen's microenvironment. The regulation of that microenvironment and the manner by which it influences sperm maturation have been the topic of investigation for many years, though the study of the human epididymis directly is fraught with problems related to sample availability and condition. Nevertheless, investigations using a variety of mammalian tissue sources, human included, have resulted in significant advances in our understanding of both the biology and pathology of the organ. The epididymal functions of transporting, concentrating, maturing, and storing sperm are important to male fertility and their absence or significant impairment can be a factor in male infertility.

In 1668 Regnier De Graaf reported his dissection of the human epididymis, which included a partial unraveling of the epididymal tubule (Figure 1A and B). He gave the following description:


Figure 1. . Dissections of the human epididymis. (A) Regnier De Graaf's dissection of the human epididymis (1668). The tunica albuginea of the epididymis has been removed, exposing the efferent ducts still attached to the proximal pole of the testis. (B) Enlargement of A showing De Graaf's microdissection to reveal the single epididymal tubule or “thread” arising from a mass of tubules still attached to its origin on the testis. (C) The human caput epididymidis from a 53-year-old male. Tissues were collected 10 hours postmortem. Appearance of the tissue (thick tunica albuginea, no luminal filling of the tubules) indicates the poor status of this tissue collected from a male who had died with colon cancer. Contrast this with the tissue in F. The arrow indicates the general proximal-to-distal direction of the underlying epididymal tubule. (D) Decapsulated human caput epididymidis revealing a mass of indistinct tubules similar to that shown by De Graaf at the bottom of B. (E) The same epididymis as in C and D but with the caput tubules uncoiled revealing 13-15 efferent ducts leading toward the true epididymal tubule. The arrow indicates how the tissue was straightened for display to demonstrate how the efferent ducts make up a majority of the tissue of the human caput epididymidis. (F) Healthy caput epididymidis from 23-year-old male. Note the thin tunica and filled, distinct tubules (arrows) and an epididymal cyst (asterisk); such cysts are common in the caput region. Here and elsewhere, all human tissues were collected under a protocol approved by the University of Virginia Health Sciences Institutional Review Board.

Download figure to PowerPoint

  • The duct of the epididymis, thus unraveled, becomes thicker the further it proceeds from its origin as six or seven branches at the top of the testicle. Where the branches run together into one duct it can be compared with a rather thin thread which gradually enlarges until it attains the thickness of a piece of string and constitutes the vas deferens. (De Graaf, 1668; translated by Jocelyn and Setchell, 1972)

De Graaf described the epididymal tubule's origin as arising from a number of “branches” we now know as the efferent ducts, which comprise much of the proximal epididymis (Figure 1C through E). Figure 1C illustrates the proximal epididymis, dorsal view, of a 53-year-old man with a thickened tunica albuginea covering the organ. The arrow indicates the proximal-to-distal direction of the underlying epididymal tubule. The decapsulated tissue (Figure 1D) reveals an amorphous bundle of flaccid tubules that, when dissected and with the core epididymal tubule straightened (indicated by straightened arrow), show themselves to be efferent ducts (Figure 1E). Although the anatomist said that these ducts numbered 6 or 7, they typically vary in number between 11 and 15 (Figure 1E; Jonte and Holstein, 1978; Yeung et al, 1991). The efferent ducts, which communicate proximally with the rete testis, anastamose distally at multiple points along the single caput epididymidal tubule (Figure 1E). Even though De Graaf likened the tubule to a thread, he knew it contained “seminal matter” and he stated that the epididymis existed so that matter “might be better elaborated by a long delay in transit” (Jocelyn and Setchell, 1972).

Interestingly, De Graaf's description of the epididymis predated Leewenhoek's discovery of spermatozoa (Leewenhoek, 1678), so De Graaf's term, seminal matter, in his description of the epididymis referred only to the idea that something in the ejaculate (generally accepted to be of a testicular source) was necessary for the generation of new life. Because De Graaf had no concept of spermatozoa, he could have had no concept of sperm maturation; so, he postulated that the long, thin thread he had uncoiled was necessary for the seminal matter to be “elaborated”—that is, made complete—over time. In stating that opinion, De Graaf was perhaps the first to make a published comment about epididymal function and thereby initiated a discussion that is still active over 300 years later.

A major difficulty in developing information about the human epididymis has been the lack of human epididymal tissue suitable for research. The epididymis consists of a highly coiled single tubule (Figure 1A); thus, the organ may not be biopsied and epididymectomy is extremely rare, especially in men within their reproductive years. This has meant that most studies of the human epididymis have used tissues from older men who have undergone therapeutic orchidectomy for prostate cancer. These men are typically beyond their reproductive years, and the results gained from those tissues are unlikely to reflect the biology of the normally functioning epididymis. Tissues extirpated from elderly patients who have died from a variety of diseases and have been exposed to a variety of treatments are unlikely to have been receiving the endocrine, paracrine, and lumicrine signaling of the “normal” epididymis. In this regard, Figure 1C—showing the proximal epididymis of a 53-year-old male after cancer treatments, with its thick tunica and flaccid, indistinct tubules—is in great contrast to a healthy epididymis from a 23-year-old, with its thin tunica and distinct tubules (Figure 1F).

Another occasional source of human epididymal tissue is from younger men with testicular cancer, but these testes are often heavily involved with tumor and their ipsilateral epididymides cannot be considered to be normal. Tissues from younger men obtained after lethal misfortune do not have that same disadvantage, but often suffer from the lack of preservation proper for morphological, biochemical, or molecular studies. Tissues that are fixed, frozen, or analyzed unpreserved after several hours of anoxia will be no more appropriate for study than lab animal tissues treated in the same way. Protein and RNA degradation can begin within minutes of loss of blood flow, so unless some indication of good preservation is given, even results ostensibly obtained from healthy human tissues must often be regarded with caution.

These limitations have meant that most of what is known about the biology of the human epididymis results from studies performed in laboratory animals with a more occasional use of human tissue to determine where similarities or dissimilarities exist. Although this present review will focus on understanding the human epididymis, common reference will be made to selected studies in laboratory animals; however, this is not intended to be an extensive review of mammalian epididymal biology. Those reviews are already available (Robaire and Hinton, 2002; Robaire et al, 2006). Rather, this review will consider some features of epididymal anatomy and histology that have practical relevance to both basic and clinical investigators, but that are rarely, if ever, discussed in context. Following that, the key functions of the organ will be discussed, again with an eye toward issues of practical relevance to both basic and clinical investigators.

Anatomy of the Human Epididymis

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Anatomy of the Human Epididymis
  4. Histology of the Epididymal Tubule
  5. Dysgenesis/Atresia of the Epididymis
  6. Epididymal Functions
  7. Conclusion
  8. References

The epididymis is typically adherent to the testis, with the attachment to the cranial pole of the testis being via the efferent ducts and the connective tissue tunica of the caput. Medially, the epididymis is attached to the testis by the epididymo-testicular connective tissue, and distally by both the caudal connective tissue and the epididymal fat pad (Figure 2A). Classical gross anatomy uses the terms globus major for the proximal epididymis and globus minor for the distal epididymis, with the globus minor disappearing in the epididymal fat pad (Figure 2A).


Figure 2. . (A) The human testis and epididymis as they appear removed intact from the scrotum. The globus major at the cranial pole of the testis is the proximal part of the organ and receiving the sperm and intraluminal fluids from the testis. The globus minor is the distal part of the organ and is shrouded by the epididymal fat pad. (B) The partially dissected testis and epididymis with epididymal fat removed. The caput, corpus, and cauda epididymides are indicated with the cauda tubule evolving into the convoluted vas deferens rising vertically on the left. Inset: A magnified view of decapsulated corpus tubules. The white appearance indicates a healthy tubule filled with spermatozoa. The 2 vertical lines on the right indicate 1 mm.

Download figure to PowerPoint

The nomenclature more commonly used in reproductive biology and medicine divides the epididymis into 3 broad regions: the caput (head), corpus (body), and cauda (tail) epididymidis (Figure 2B). As already described (Figure 1), the caput epididymidis in the human consists largely of efferent ducts. This fact has clinical relevance in cases of microsurgical epididymal sperm extraction (MESA) and percutaneous sperm aspiration (PESA) because the tubules of the caput epididymidis are multiple (Figure 1E), whereas more distally there is only a single epididymal tubule arranged in multiple coils (Figure 2B, inset). This means that MESA- or PESA-induced occlusion or damage of an efferent duct in the caput epididymidis will not obstruct total luminal flow through the organ, whereas such an occlusion of the more distal tubule will cause a complete epididymal obstruction. In practice, MESA and PESA can occur distal to the efferent ducts without causing obstruction, but the possibility of such an injury should be considered when deciding on type and location of aspiration procedure.

The total length of the typical human epididymis—the organ, not the tubule itself—is between 10 and 12 cm before the cauda tubule evolves to become the convoluted vas deferens (rising on the left side of Figure 2B). The epididymides often available from elderly patients undergoing orchidectomy can be as small as 7 mm in length and can have approximately half the mass of the healthy epididymis. Anatomy texts commonly report the uncoiled epididymal tubule to be 6–7 m in length, though the source of this estimate is unknown. The value may be an underestimation, given that the much smaller rat epididymis contains a single tubule that has been uncoiled and measured to be 3.2 m in length (Turner et al, 1990).

Histology of the Epididymal Tubule

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Anatomy of the Human Epididymis
  4. Histology of the Epididymal Tubule
  5. Dysgenesis/Atresia of the Epididymis
  6. Epididymal Functions
  7. Conclusion
  8. References

The epithelium of the epididymis varies proximally to distally (Figure 3), and maintenance of the tissue with regard to both form and function requires lumicrine secretions of the testis (Hinton et al, 1998; Turner et al, 2007). The epididymis in Figure 1C through E, for example, is from a terminally ill cancer patient well beyond his reproductive years. Further, the patient had likely received at least one of a variety of treatments that could also affect testicular production of androgens, seminiferous tubule secretions, and spermatogenesis (eg, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or antiandrogens). As a consequence, that epididymis is clearly dysfunctional, as judged by the following:


Figure 3. . Histology of human epididymis. Maintenance of the epididymis requires the secretions of a normal seminiferous epithelium in the testis (A). The caput epididymidis (B) is comprised largely of efferent ducts (illustrated) with small tubule diameters and an epithelium of irregular height but with true cilia. The true epididymal tubule of the corpus (C) is larger in diameter, has a tall, columnar epithelium of regular height. Microvilli line the lumen, and spermatozoa are more dense than in the caput. The cauda tubule (D) has a much larger lumen diameter, a short, columnar epithelium with short microvilli, and a lumen with a dense pack of spermatozoa. Examples of cilia (c) of the efferent duct epithelium and microvilli (m) of the epididymal epithelium are indicated. All panels×250 magnification.

Download figure to PowerPoint

  • The epididymal tunica is thickened, causing neither the efferent ducts nor the epididymal tubule to be visible beneath the tunica.

  • In the detunicated organ (Figure 1D), the tubules remain flaccid, indistinct, and with no apparent sperm content. This is a very different appearance from that of the healthy epididymis, wherein the tunica is thin and the tubules are distinct, being filled with sperm and luminal fluid (Figures 1F and 2B, inset).

  • The epididymis illustrated in Figure 1C through E is much reduced in size relative to epididymides from healthy males (Figure 1F). The alert scientist should be aware of how inappropriate such epididymides are for investigations aimed at understanding the biology, not the pathology, of the organ.

As noted, an appropriately functioning testis (Figure 3A) is key to the regulation and support of the epididymis (Figure 3B through D). Leydig cells of the testicular interstitium produce androgens, which are required for the support of many epididymal features from morphology to individual gene expressions (Robaire et al, 2006). Sertoli cells support the development of spermatozoa, but also produce secretions like androgen-binding protein (Danzo et al, 1977) and basic fibroblast growth factor (Lan et al, 1998) that appear necessary for the regulation of the epididymal epithelium, especially in the proximal regions of the duct. For this reason, a histologically normal seminiferous epithelium in the ipsilateral testis (Figure 3A) provides a signal that the epididymis has been appropriately supported.

The human epididymis has no “initial segment” as popularly thought of from studies primarily of the rodent epididymis (Reid and Cleland, 1957; Jelinsky et al, 2007). The efferent ducts make up the majority of the human caput epididymidis (Figure 3B), and these have as many as 7 different types of epithelia, depending on location within the ducts (Yeung et al, 1991). The epithelia of these tubules are commonly irregular in height and the tubule diameters are small relative to true epididymal tubules (Yeung et al, 1991; Figure 3B and C). The epithelium of the efferent ducts varies from low cuboidal to tall columnar and true cilia (9 + 2 microtubules; ability to beat) appear throughout the duct (Yeung et al, 1991). The physiology and cell biology of the efferent ducts have been studied largely in laboratory animals; it has been well reviewed elsewhere (Hess, 2002, 2003), and will not be detailed here.

It is common to see histological cross-sectional profiles of efferent ducts with no or few sperm in the lumen (Figure 3B). This is not necessarily because of the absence of sperm production in the testis; it can be caused by the naturally dilute sperm concentrations coming over in the rete testis fluid. Alternatively, sperm could be released from the rete testis in pulses, and if the interpulse intervals are long, most tubule profiles in a random section through the efferent ducts would be expected to have no or few sperm.

Healthy epididymides may have these limited numbers of sperm evident in the efferent ducts (Figure 3B) yet have many sperm in the lumen of the corpus tubule (Figure 3C) and even more in the cauda (Figure 3D). This is because sperm are concentrated during their transit of the epididymis (see below).

In the case of an obstructed epididymis, the normal distribution of sperm in the epididymis changes depending on the level of the obstruction. Typically, there will be no sperm in the lumen below the site of obstruction, but above the obstruction sperm will have accumulated in the lumen, potentially backing up all the way to the efferent ducts or even to the rete testis. Near the site of obstruction, the dense sperm pack in the tubule lumen will consist of senescent and degenerating sperm, and in cases of sperm granuloma these will be mixed with macrophages and neutrophils, which can be interstitial, intraepithelial or even intraluminal (Wang and Holstein, 1983; Pollanen and Cooper, 1994).

The true epididymal tubule in the distal caput and corpus has a columnar epithelium with microvilli (no 9 + 2 microtubules, no capacity to beat) projecting into the tubule lumen. Microvilli at all levels in the epididymis (Figure 3) provide a huge increase in luminal membrane surface area that may be important in providing area for cell surface receptors, transport channels, and even membrane for endocytic events. At the level of the corpus epididymidis, the lumen should contain readily evident concentrations of spermatozoa (Figure 3C). At the electron microscope level (not shown) the apical borders of epididymal epithelial cells exhibit cell-cell tight junctions (Friend and Gilula, 1972) composed of a number of cell adhesion molecules (Cyr et al, 2007; Dubé et al, 2007), which impose a blood-epididymal barrier similar in effect to the blood-testis barrier (Howards et al, 1976); that is, the blood-epididymal barrier provides a specialized, immune-privileged microenvironment in which sperm remain isolated from other body compartments (Hinton, 1985).

The lumen of a healthy cauda epididymidal tubule is greatly expanded in diameter, has a short, more cuboidal epithelium with short stereocilia, and contains a dense pack of spermatozoa (Figure 3D). The epididymal epithelium of most species has at least 6 different cell types: principal cells, clear cells, basal cells, narrow cells, apical cells, and halo cells, all of which differ in relative abundance depending on the epididymal region and species studies. In all cases, however, including the human, the predominant cell type is the principal cell. Detailed descriptions of these cell types are largely derived from other species and have recently been reviewed elsewhere (Robaire et al, 2006).

Dysgenesis/Atresia of the Epididymis

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Anatomy of the Human Epididymis
  4. Histology of the Epididymal Tubule
  5. Dysgenesis/Atresia of the Epididymis
  6. Epididymal Functions
  7. Conclusion
  8. References

Anatomical abnormalities of the epididymis, usually associated with undescended testes, occur in only a small minority of fertile men. On the other hand, in almost 300 cases of obstructive azoospermia, Girgis et al (1969) found that a dysgenesis or atresia of the tubule had occurred between the caput epididymidis and the testis in 21% of cases and in the cadua epididymis or vas deferens in 39% of cases. Kroovand and Perlmutter (1981) described 8 different types of developmental anomalies of the epididymis, including complete absence of the excurrent ducts, absence of a connection between the testis and caput epididymidis, agenesis of different regions or segments of the epididymis, and extensive disconnection of the corpus and/or cauda of the epididymis from the testis allowing, respectively, a “looping” epididymis or one that can angle sharply away from the testis.

Although these conditions can exist in the adult, the most common examinations of the epididymis occur in young boys at the time of repair of cryptorchidism. Estimates of the summed frequency of anomalies like those listed above range from 35% (Mollaeian et al, 1994) to almost 90% (Koff and Scaletscky, 1990) in cryptorchid boys. In boys with epididymides being examined for reasons other than cryptorchidism, the summed incidence of similar types of anomalies was less than 5%, excluding the “looped” epididymis (Turek et al, 1994). Interestingly, the looped epididymis (attachment only at the caput and cauda, thus allowing the corpus to loop away from the testis) occurred in 84% of noncryptorchid epididymides. This implies that the looped condition found with cryptorchidism (Koff and Scaletscky, 1990; Kucukaydin et al, 1998) is not really an anomaly but rather the usual condition of the young epididymis. Because the looped epididymis is not usually seen in the noncryptorchid adult, the data of Turek et al (1994) imply that the connective tissue connection between testis and epididymis is still condensing during child and, potentially, adolescent development.

The histologic appearance of the cryptorchid epididymis also reflects a failure of normal development of the epididymal epithelium as well as the failure of the peritubular musculature of the cauda to develop properly (Migel et al, 2001). This developmental failure is already evident in epididymides from boys in the first years of life, so whether orchidopexy will allow sufficient stimulation of the epididymis to produce “catch-up” growth even in a patent system is an open question.

The main clinical point regarding the cryptorchid epididymis relates to the potential for the orchidopexed, formerly cryptorchid testis to eventually contribute to fertility. No amount of spermatogenesis will overcome a dysmorphic epididymis. Although long-term studies of epididymides known to have been dysplastic at the time of orchidopexy have not been done, it seems likely that epididymal anomalies will persist over time, especially in the unusual cases of segmental or regional atresia; thus, attention to the condition of the epididymis at the time of orchidopexy can help inform any prognosis being considered, especially in bilateral cases.

Although the cause(s) for the different types of epididymal dysgenesis associated with cryptorchidism remains unknown, the molecular biology underlying these lesions is proving to be interesting. Boys with cryptorchidism (thus, with a high rate of epididymal malformation) have an increased incidence of mutation of the HOXA-10 gene (Kolon et al, 1999), and Hoxa-10 and Hoxa-11 expressions are known to be necessary for the proper development of the epididymis and vas deferens in mice (Hsieh-Li et al, 1995; Benson et al, 1996). Further, Hoxa-10 and Hoxa-11 knockout mice have a high rate of cryptorchidism (Branford et al, 2000) and HOXA-13 mutations in the human have been associated with hand-foot-genital syndrome, in which, among other symptoms, the distal genital tract is abnormal (Goodman et al, 2000).

Hox genes (there are HOXA, HOXB, HOXC, and HOXD clusters on different chromosomes) produce transcription factors important for anterior-to-posterior segmental development in the embryo (Carroll, 1995). The numbered genes are arrayed 3′ to 5′ within their clusters, and the more 5′ genes (HOXA-8 through HOXA-13, for example) are typically expressed more posteriorly in the embryo and later in development than their more 3′ orthologs (Bomgardner et al, 2001). The connection between the rete testis and the efferent ducts is typically made in the third month of embryogenesis; thus, to the degree that Hox genes are involved, epididymal malformations that include absence of a connection to the testis, perhaps because of agenesis of the efferent ducts, may involve the more 3′ genes in the Hox clusters. Malformations of the more distal tract, for example, the cauda epididymidis and vas deferens, may be influenced by misexpression of the more 5′ Hox genes, as has been shown with hoxa-10 and hoxa-11 expression in the mouse. Evidence in the mouse suggests that the Notch signaling pathway may also be important in establishing the efferent duct-rete testis connection (Lupien et al, 2006).

Hedgehog proteins also play a role in tissue orientation in the embryo, and one of these, sonic hedgehog, has been known for some time to be important for the development of the prostate from the urogenital sinus (Podlasek et al, 1999). More recently, sonic hedgehog gene and protein expressions have been detected in the epididymis of the adult mouse (Turner et al, 2004), and inhibition of the hedgehog pathway inhibits epididymal sperm maturation (Turner et al, 2006a). Current evidence also suggests that sonic hedgehog protein is present in the epithelium of the adult human epididymis, including specific parts of the efferent ducts, but not the testis (Figure 4). Interestingly, the epithelial cells of the efferent ducts that stain for sonic hedgehog protein (Figure 4F) appear to be selected principal cell and apical cells, whereas all epithelial cells of true epididymal epithelium stain for the protein (Figure 4H, J, and L). Although sonic hedgehog is typically secreted basolaterally toward mesenchymal cells, in the epididymis the protein is also secreted luminally, where it associates with luminal spermatozoa and cell debris (Figure 4H, J, and L). It has been speculated previously that disruption of the sonic hedgehog pathway during development could play a role in epididymal malformation, but preliminary evidence here suggests that the pathway continues to play a role in the adult epididymis, a possibility that requires further exploration.


Figure 4. . Immunohistochemical localization of sonic hedgehog protein (SHH) in the adult human epididymis. SHH did not immunolocalize to the active seminiferous epithelium (A, B) or to the Type 1 efferent duct (caput) tubules (C, D). SHH was detected in the epithelium of Type 3 efferent ducts (E, F) as well as the corpus (G, H), proximal cauda (I, J), and distal cauda (K, L). Importantly, the seminiferous tubules showed complete spermatogenesis and delivered sperm and, presumably, other testicular products to the epididymal lumen (G—L). Sections illustrated in A, C, E, G, I, and K received no primary (negative controls). B, D, F, H, J, and L illustrate sections that were serial to the controls and were processed with primary antibody. All panels×62 magnification.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Another cause of epididymal dysgenesis is mutation of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene that occurs in cystic fibrosis. Over 500 different mutations of CFTR have been identified, explaining the wide spectrum of the cystic fibrosis phenotype (Wong, 1998). One constant in the disease is that approximately 95% of men with clinical cystic fibrosis have congenital absence of the vas deferens (Wong, 1998), which is commonly accompanied by absence of the cauda and corpus epididymidis as well. This points to a morphogenic failure of the mesonephric derivatives as early as the 13th week of gestation. At that time the Wolffian system is differentiating into the epididymis and scrotal vas deferens (Kroovand and Perlmutter, 1981). CFTR is expressed in the human embryonic, postnatal, and adult epididymis, and the highest expression at all of these times is in the caput epithelium (Tizzano et al, 1993, 1994; Patrizio and Salameh, 1998). CFTR is also expressed in the human vas deferens (Tizzano et al, 1994; Patrizio and Salameh, 1998) and in cultured vas deferens epithelium (Harris et al, 1991). Because the CFTR protein is a regulated chloride channel and mutations disrupt its transport function, the evidence suggests that the CFTR mutation causes dysfunction of the early mesonephric tubule and possible lumicrine secretions necessary for sustained development of the embryonic vas deferens and distal epididymis. It is conceivable that upstream secretions altered through CFTR misexpression cause downstream effects on the transcription of the 5′ Hox genes mentioned earlier or on the activity of their gene products. In this way, mutations of CFTR expressed in the proximal epididymis can lead to agenesis of the distal epididymis and vas deferens.

Finally, epididymal dysgenesis can be induced by mutation of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene, a condition most strongly associated with renal cell carcinoma (Glassberg, 2002). VHL mutation in the male can cause epididymal cystadenomas (Glasker et al, 2006) and, more rarely, obstruction of the epididymis (Ayden et al, 2005; Pozza et al, 1994). This can lead to infertility if bilateral.

Epididymal Functions

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Anatomy of the Human Epididymis
  4. Histology of the Epididymal Tubule
  5. Dysgenesis/Atresia of the Epididymis
  6. Epididymal Functions
  7. Conclusion
  8. References

The adult epididymis is important for fertility not only as a conduit for sperm between the testis to the vas deferens, but also as an active contributor to the formation of a fertile ejaculate. The epididymis transports, concentrates, matures, and stores spermatozoa. Each of these classic functions is discussed briefly below.

Sperm Transport

Sperm are moved through the epididymis in part by hydrostatic pressures originating from fluids secreted in the seminiferous tubules (Setchell, 1974) and by peristaltic-like contractions of the tubules (Hinton and Setchell, 1978). Contractions of the tunica albuginea of the testis (Banks et al, 2006) also potentially play a role in the generation of positive fluid pressure in the head of the epididymis. Peristaltic-like contractions of the peritubular myoid surrounding the epididymal tubule (Jaakola, 1983; Turner et al, 1990) plus the positive hydrostatic pressure from the caput (Johnson and Howards, 1975, 1976) aid in moving the luminal content down the more distal duct. Empirical observations during in vivo micropuncture experiments in the rat indicate that the contractile activity and the subsequent back-and-forth agitation of the luminal contents increase with increasing intraluminal pressure. The regulation of such activity and the role of intraluminal pressure on it remains an open question.

Net transport rates are estimated to be most rapid in the efferent ducts and proximal epididymis, where fluid is nonviscous and water is being rapidly absorbed from the lumen; transport rates decrease in the more distal tubule where the lumen content becomes more viscous (Turner et al, 1990). The time required for sperm to transit the epididymis has been assessed in a variety of ways in laboratory animals and is notable for its relative consistency (10–13 days) between species of vastly different sizes. In the human, however, sperm transport time has been estimated to be only 2–6 days (Robaire et al, 2006), meaning that the time the human sperm spends in the epididymis is relatively short. Johnson and Varner (1988) demonstrated that men with high testicular sperm output have shorter epididymal transit times than men with low testicular sperm output (∼2 days vs ∼6 days, respectively). This may be because testes that produce more sperm also produce more fluid, thus moving the epididymal content along more rapidly.

The rate of sperm movement through the epididymis might be more important than is generally recognized because the concentration of secreted or absorbed molecules in any luminal fluid is a function of proluminal and antiluminal epithelial transport activities and the time the intraluminal fluid is exposed to those activities. In the case of the epididymal lumen fluid, the concentrations of ions, small organic molecules, and specific proteins secreted by the epithelium are likely important for sperm maturation or for the regulation of downstream activities of the epididymal epithelium. Radically altered rates of movement of luminal content down the epididymal tubule could alter the amount of fluid reabsorbed at any one point or the amount of a molecule secreted in a specific volume. Such changes could affect not only the concentration of intraluminal spermatozoa, but also the concentration of molecules important to the sperm's maturation environment.

Sperm Concentration

The sperm-concentrating ability of the mammalian epididymis has been established for many years (Crabo, 1965; Levine and Marsh, 1971). The increase in sperm concentrations between the efferent ducts and cauda epididymidis is caused by fluid reabsorption subsequent to antiluminal electrolyte transport (Wong et al, 1978, 2002). In a number of laboratory species, 75%–95% of fluid leaving the rete testis has been reabsorbed by the time the transported spermatozoa reach the mid—caput epididymidis (Turner, 2002; Robaire et al, 2006). In fact, much of this fluid reabsorption occurs in the efferent ducts, where estrogen and estrogen receptors play an important role in its regulation (Hess, 2003).

Although direct measurements of fluid reabsorption have not been made in the human epididymis, histological evidence substantiates that the human efferent ducts and proximal epididymis also concentrate spermatozoa in the tubule lumen (Figure 3). Catecholamines (Wong and Yeung, 1977), aldosterone (Turner and Cesarini, 1983; Hinton and Keefer, 1985), the renin-angiotensin system (Leung et al, 2000), and estrogen (Hess, 2003), among others, have all been hypothesized to play a regulatory role in this fluid reabsorption. Although the issue requires further investigation, it is clear that the mechanism of in vivo lumen volume regulation is very complex. Ion transport channels like CTFR and the antiluminal sodium transporters cause osmotic shifts that draw water from the epididymal lumen through aquaporin channels in the epithelial cell membranes (Cheung et al, 2003; Da Silva et al, 2006). This reabsorption of water results in a gradual increase in intraluminal sperm concentrations and, ultimately, to a dense sperm pack filling the lumen of the cauda epididymidis (Figure 3A). The regulatory molecules mentioned earlier (catecholamines, aldosterone, estrogen, etc) can influence these transporters and either stimulate or repress net water movement out of the lumen.

Because only 5%–10% of the final human ejaculate volume is contributed by the cauda epididymidis (Wetterauer, 1986; Weiske, 1994), it is essential that intraluminal cauda sperm density be high to insure adequate sperm concentrations in the final ejaculate. For this reason, the sperm-concentrating function of the epididymis and the cellular mechanisms supporting it are important for the development of the fertile ejaculate.

Sperm Maturation

More than 300 years after De Graaf opined that the function of the epididymis was to simply hold its “seminal matter” until it matured, a debate continued as to whether or not this is true (Silber, 1988, 1989; Cooper, 1990). Does the epididymis simply act as a reservoir for sperm until they mature intrinsically or does it provide extrinsic factors that are required for sperm maturation?

In the early part of the twentieth century, Young (1929a, 1929b, 1931) used the guinea pig as a model to come to the conclusion that time alone was sufficient for sperm maturation, but later evidence in a number of species showed that this was wrong. In fact, an accumulation of later data demonstrated that sperm do need extrinsic factors from the epididymal microenvironment to become fully mature (Cooper, 1990; Turner, 1995; Toshimori, 2003).

Gene expressions and protein secretions vary in distinct patterns along the human epididymal duct (Dacheux et al, 2006; Dubé et al, 2007; Kirchhoff, 2007) as they do in other species (Cornwall et al, 2002; Dacheux et al, 2003). Complex associations of proteins in membranous vesicles called epididymosomes are also secreted along the epididymal duct in some species, and those vesicles have been shown to transfer specific proteins directly to luminal spermatozoa (Sullivan et al, 2003). Similar vesicles have also been reported in the human epididymis (Frenette et al, 2006), but their role remains unresolved. Electrolytes and small organic molecules change in characteristic patterns along the epididymis, as well (Turner, 2002), and it is the exposure of sperm to this ever-changing microenvironment that is necessary for their full maturation (Turner, 1995; Robaire et al, 2006). In the mammalian species given as examples in the Table, sperm attributes like progressive sperm motility and the ability to bind to the ovum increase from essentially zero in the caput epididymidis to much higher values in the cauda.

In obstructed epididymides, it is true that sperm in the caput tubule (Qui et al, 2003) or even in the seminiferous tubules (Belker et al, 1998) can exhibit an increased capacity for motility, but this is likely because of events ranging from remodeling of the existing ductal epithelium subsequent to the obstruction (Turner et al, 2000) to the accomplishment of some steps in the maturation process that can occur because of time alone. It is also true that human pregnancies through natural mating can occur even though the ejaculated sperm have bypassed most of the epididymis, as when a vasoepididymostomy (VE) has been performed in the caput to bypass an obstruction in the corpus or cauda (Schoysman and Bedford, 1986; Silber, 1989). Even more rare is the natural pregnancy established after vasoefferentiostomy (VEF; Silber, 1988); still, it is a legitimate question how such pregnancies occur if it is true that exposure to the epididymal microenvironment is required for complete sperm maturation.

First of all, conventional fertility trials are for 1 year, yet pregnancies reported by some investigators after VE or VEF have occurred after much longer times. Silber (1989), for example, reported that some of his fertile patients after VE required up to 4 years to achieve a pregnancy. Such extended periods of study allow reporting of the rare pregnancy made even rarer by the consideration of the number of attempts made to achieve the pregnancy. Fertility trials extended beyond the norm introduce potential paternity concerns, as well. Putting those issues aside, the fact remains that caput VEs or VEFs do lead to an occasional pregnancy after either brief or even no exposure of sperm to the epididymal microenvironment. Possibilities that allow for sperm maturation in these situations are as follows: 1) Long-term obstruction causes remodeling of the caput or efferent duct epithelium, which makes the proximal microenvironment more conducive to sperm maturation. 2) With both VE and VEF, sperm cells are exposed to the microenvironment of the vas deferens. That rarely-studied microenvironment may be more useful for sperm maturation than is commonly appreciated.

There are other factors that likely play a role in any pregnancy established after VE or VEF. For example, sperm cell maturation presumably follows a Gaussian distribution; that is, a few cells will mature much more easily than the average and a few cells will mature much less easily than the average. The small proportion of sperm cells with a tendency toward early maturation are likely the ones finding sufficient stimulation in the post-VE microenvironment of only the proximal caput plus the vas deferens to reach functional maturity. Those few sperm could be sufficient to produce the occasional pregnancy. Nevertheless, it is quite clear that the chances for developing a fertile ejaculate after VE increase with the length of the epididymis the sperm were able to transit (Silber, 1988; Schlegel and Goldstein, 1993; Belker, 2001).

Because some sperm that have been exposed to only a short portion of the epididymis can fertilize an egg in vivo, it is not surprising that sperm in epididymal aspirates from the obstructed proximal epididymis can fertilize an egg in vitro. When used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) or even conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF), sperm collected from the proximal regions of an obstructed epididymis have a relatively high fertility potential. The use of aspirated sperm in ICSI totally bypasses the requirement that sperm be motile and be able to acrosome react, penetrate the zona, bind to the egg plasma membrane, fuse with the membrane, and complete fertilization on their own. Even in conventional IVF, there is no requirement for sperm survival in seminal plasma, then cervical mucus, followed by the uterine environment and the oviductal fluids before encountering the egg at the site of fertilization. Neither is there a need for the kind for motility capable of propelling the sperm through the cervical mucus into the uterus then through the uterotubal junction into the oviduct; thus, MESA and PESA in the very proximal epididymal tubules or efferent ducts can collect sperm useful for both IVF and ICSI.

Interestingly, it has been reported that sperm collected more proximally in the obstructed epididymis are more useful for assisted reproductive techniques (ART) than sperm collected more distally near the site of obstruction (Silber et al, 1990; Marmar et al, 1993; Schlegel et al, 1994). The reason for this likely relates to at least 2 factors:

  • The movement of intraluminal content down the epididymal duct is positive but pendular, with sperm being pushed forward then backward (Jaakola, 1983; Turner et al, 1990) by peristaltic-like contractions of the epididymal tubule (Jaakola and Talo, 1982). In the acutely obstructed epididymides of laboratory animals, our unpublished observations are that the vigor of the back-and-forth surges of luminal content increases as intraluminal pressure increases after obstruction. In the chronically obstructed human epididymis, it appears likely that the movement of luminal content over long periods of time could result in sperm from a more proximal part of the duct being mixed with sperm from the more distal part of the duct; thus, some sperm collected from the more proximal duct could have been exposed to a more distal microenvironment than usually imagined.

  • Starting at the efferent ducts, the more distally one goes along the obstructed epididymis, the nearer one approaches the point of obstruction where the epididymal lumen contains nothing but dead cells and cell debris. In such cases, moving proximally from the obstruction gets away from the area containing a high proportion of degraded spermatozoa. Taking of samples in this area may be why some investigators have found human testicular sperm more useful in ICSI procedures than sperm from obstructed epididymides (Dozortesev et al, 2006). Moving as far distally along the epididymis as possible while still remaining proximal to the region of degraded sperm allows the highest possibility of success in obtaining sperm useful for ART.

It is important to note that the human data in the Table are all from sperm obtained from unobstructed epididymides, not the obstructed epididymides encountered clinically in MESA or PESA procedures. Thus, regardless of the species studied, sperm from these unobstructed epididymides are essentially immotile and infertile in the caput, and they gain the capacity for these characteristics during epididymal transit (Moore et al, 1983; Buffat et al, 2006). Also in the Table, the increasing sperm maturation parameters between proximal and distal epididymis of the human appear to be less dramatic than in the other species. This is a case where the functions of mature sperm are likely diminished by the fact that they were acquired from elderly cancer patients.

Sperm Storage

Approximately 55%–65% of total epididymal sperm in the human are stored in the cauda epididymidis (Amann, 1981). Interestingly, although as a proportion of testicular output this compares favorably with other species (Bedford, 1994), it is only the equivalent of 3 average ejaculates (Johnson and Varner, 1988), whereas in some species the cauda contains sperm sufficient for many more ejaculates (Curtis and Amann, 1981). Although sperm can pass through the human cauda within a couple of days, fertile sperm can be stored for several weeks in both man (Bedford, 1994) and other mammals (Jones and Murdoch, 1996). How long effective storage may be in the human is uncertain, but sperm motility in the ejaculate of young men can be preserved for up to 7–8 weeks after the last ejaculation (Bedford, 1994). In older men, sperm motility in the cauda epididymidis can actually be less than in the distal corpus epididymidis (Yeung et al, 1993). That reduced motility may be because of the already mentioned problem of epididymides being obtained from sexually inactive, older men, in whom months of sperm storage leads to senescence of sperm in the cauda epididymidis and vas deferens. Such an explanation makes intuitive sense, but how true it is remains uncertain because we still know so little about the biology of sperm storage in the epididymis. It is an area of epididymal function that has been largely ignored for many years. Although the critical features of the storage environment remain unknown, specific proteins secreted into the lumen by the more proximal epithelium, intraluminal ionic concentrations controlled by the epithelium, the subsequent reduction of luminal pH, and the high osmolality of the lumen fluid have all been shown to play a role in maintaining quiescent cauda sperm in several species (Jones and Murdoch, 1996; Robaire et al, 2006). The cauda microenvironment must also protect stored sperm against microbes, xenobiotics, and oxidative stress, protections that are important in the more proximal epididymis as well (Hinton et al, 1995).

Antimicrobial defenses are provided in part by epididymal β-defensins or defensin-related proteins, many of which are highly expressed in the epididymis and differentially regulated between the epididymal regions of both humans (Hall et al, 2007; Kirchhoff, 2007) and other mammals (Jelinsky et al, 2006). A variety of protease inhibitors, lipocalins, and metal-chelating compounds participate in the epididymal host defense as well (Hall et al, 2002; Lundwall, 2007). Antioxidant strategies involving the glutathione system (glutathione peroxidase, glutathione-S-transferase, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, etc) and the superoxide dismutase/catalase system have been studied in laboratory species (Hinton et al, 1995; Robaire et al, 2006) and are known to exist in the human epididymis (Potts et al, 1999). The relative importance of the 2 antioxidant systems for the protection of sperm is not known, but the presence of at least 2 major systems in the epididymis suggests a redundancy that is likely important for prolonged sperm survival. Inflammation and oxidative stress are important clinical entities in the epididymis because epididymitis is the fifth most common urological diagnosis in men within their reproductive years (Collins et al, 1998) and has historically been a major cause of lost man-hours in the American military (Moore et al, 1971). Although many cases of epididymitis are bacterial in origin, the largest studies available show those cases to be in the minority (Tracy and Steers, 2007). This means that sterile epididymitis is a significant but poorly understood epididymal pathology inviting further investigation.


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Anatomy of the Human Epididymis
  4. Histology of the Epididymal Tubule
  5. Dysgenesis/Atresia of the Epididymis
  6. Epididymal Functions
  7. Conclusion
  8. References

Much remains unknown about the mammalian epididymis generally and the human epididymis specifically. We know that the epididymis is important for the development of a fertile ejaculate and that a functioning organ depends on both endocrine and lumicrine secretions from the testis; but beyond that, what lumicrine factors are important for the maintenance of epididymal function? Which specific secretions of the epididymis are vital for development of fertile sperm? These things remain unknown. At the same time, approximately 25% of male infertility is idiopathic (Lipshultz et al, 1987) and a significant proportion of that infertility may arise from features of epididymal biology we do not presently understand. From this standpoint, more basic insights about the epididymis could eventually aid the infertile male. On the other hand, it has been recognized for many years that the epididymis might be a vector for male contraception (Hamilton, 1972; Hinton, 1980). Ideally, an epididymal approach to contraception would not involve manipulation of steroid hormones and would not require a cessation of spermatogenesis. Rather, it would inhibit an epididymal function required for the development of a fertile ejaculate. Contraception through an epididymal vector has recently received increased attention (Cooper and Yeung, 2003; Habenicht, 2003; Gottwald et al, 2006; Turner et al, 2006b), and remains a possible product of our advancing knowledge about the human epididymis.


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Anatomy of the Human Epididymis
  4. Histology of the Epididymal Tubule
  5. Dysgenesis/Atresia of the Epididymis
  6. Epididymal Functions
  7. Conclusion
  8. References
  • Amann RP. A critical review of methods for evaluation of spermatogenesis from seminal characteristics. J Androl. 1981;2: 3758.
  • Ayden H., Young RH, Ronnett BM, Epstein JI. Clear cell papillary cystadenoma of the epididymis and mesosalpinx. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29: 520523.
  • Banks FCL, Knight GE, Calvert RC, Turmaine M., Thompson CS, Mikhailidis DP, Morgan RJ, Burnstock G.. Smooth muscle and purinergic contraction of the human, rabbit, rat, and mouse testicular capsule. Biol Reprod. 2006;74: 473480.
  • Bedford JM. The status and the state of the human epididymis. Hum Reprod Update. 1994;9: 21872199.
  • Belker AM. Predictors of success in microsurgical correction of vassal and epididymal obstruction. Curr Urol Rep. 2001;21: 443447.
  • Belker AM, Sherins RJ, Dennison-Laqos L., Thorsell LP, Schulman JD. Percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration: a convenient and effective office procedure to retrieve sperm for in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Urol. 1998;160: 20582062.
  • Benson GV, Lim H., Paria BC, Satokata I., Dey SK, Maas RL. Mechanisms of reduced fertility in Hoxa-10 mice: uterine homeosis and loss of maternal Hoxa-10 expression. Development. 1996;122: 26872696.
  • Blandau RJ, Rumery RE. The relationship of swimming movements of epididymal spermatozoa to their fertilizing capacity. Fertil Steril. 1964;15: 571579.
  • Bomgardner DA, Hinton BT, Turner TT. Hox transcription factors may play a role in regulating segmental function of the adult epididymis. J Androl. 2001;22: 527531.
  • Branford WW, Benson GV, Ma L., Maas RL, Potter SS. Characterization of Hoxa-10/Hoxa-11 transheterozygotes reveals functional redundancy and regulatory interactions. Dev Biol. 2000;224: 373387.
  • Buffat C., Patrat C., Merlet F., Guibert J., Epelboin S., Thioun N., Vieillefond A., Adda-Lievin A., Lebon C., Jouannet P.. ICSI outcomes in obstructive azoospermia: influence of the origin of surgically retrieved spermatozoa and the cause of obstruction. Hum Reprod. 2006;21: 10181024.
  • Carroll SB. Homeotic genes and the evolution of arthropods and chordates. Nature. 1995;376: 479485.
  • Cheung KH, Leung CT, Leung GPH, Wong PYD. Synergistic effects of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator and aquaporin-9 in the rat epididymis. Biol Reprod. 2003;68: 15051510.
  • Collins MM, Stafford RS, O'Leary MP, Barry MJ. How common is prostatitis? A national survey of physician visits. J. Urol.. 1998;159: 12241228.
  • Cooper TG. In defense of a function for the human epididymis. Fertil Steril. 1990;54: 965975.
  • Cooper TG, Yeung CH. Approaches to post-testicular contraception: insights from the infertile c-ros knockout mouse. In: Hinton BT, Turner TT, eds. The Third International Conference on the Epididymis. Charlottesville, VA: The Van Doren Company; 2003; 208221.
  • Cornwall GA, Lareyre JJ, Matusik RJ, Hinton BT, Orgebin-Crist MC. Gene expression and epididymal function. In: Robaire B., Hinton BT, eds. The Epididymis: From Molecules to Clinical Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2002; 169199.
  • Crabo B.. Studies on the composition of epididymal content in bulls and boars. Acta Vet Scand. 1965;6(suppl 5): 194.
  • Curtis SK, Amann RP. Testicular development and establishment of spermatogenesis in Holstein bulls. J Anim Sci. 1981;53: 16451657.
  • Cyr DG, Gregory M., Dubé E., Dufresne J., Chan PTK, Hermo L.. Orchestration of occludins, claudins, catenins and cadherins as players involved in the maintenance of the blood-epididymal barrier. Asian J Androl. 2007;9: 463475.
  • Da Silva N., Pietrement C., Brown D., Breton S.. Segmental and cellular expression of aquaporins in the male excurrent duct. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1758: 10251033.
  • Dacheux JL, Belghazi M., Lanson Y., Dacheux F.. Human epididymal secretome and proteome. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2006;250: 3642.
  • Dacheux JL, Gatti JL, Dacheux F.. Contribution of epididymal secretory proteins for spermatozoa maturation. Microsc Res Tech. 2003;61: 717.
  • Dacheux JL, Paquignon M.. Relations between the fertilizing ability, motility and metabolism of epididymal spermatozoa. Reprod Nutr Dev. 1980;20: 10851099.
  • Danzo BJ, Cooper TG, Orgebin-Crist MC. Androgen binding protein (ABP) in fluids collected from the rete testis and cauda epididymis of sexually mature and immature rabbits and observations on morphological changes in the epididymis following ligation of the ductuli efferentes. Biol Reprod. 1977;17: 6477.
  • de Graaf R.. De Virorum Organis Generatoni Inserventibus, de Clysteribus et de Usu Siphonis in Anatomia. Lugd Batarorum et Roterod: Hakiana, Netherlands; 1668.
  • Dozortesev D., Neme R., Diamond MP, Abdelmassih S., Abdelmassih V., Olveira F., Abdelmassih R.. Embryos generated using testicular spermatozoa have higher developmental potential than those obtained using epididymal spermatozoa in men with obstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril. 2006;86: 606611.
  • Dubé E., Chan PTK, Hermo L., Cyr DG. Gene expression profiling and its relevance to the blood-epididymal barrier in the human epididymis. Biol Reprod. 2007;76: 10341044.
  • Frenette G., Thabet M., Sullivan R.. Polyol pathway in human epididymis and semen. J Androl. 2006;27: 233239.
  • Friend DS, Gilula NB. Variations in tight and gap junctions in mammalian tissues. J Cell Biol. 1972;53: 758776.
  • Girgis SM, Etriby AN, Ibraim AA, Kahil SA. Testicular biopsy in azoospermia. A review of the last ten years' experiences of over 800 cases. Fertil Steril. 1969;20: 467477.
  • Glasker S., Tran MG, Shively SB, Ikejiri B., Lonser RR, Maxwell PH, Zhuang Z., Oldfield EH, Vortmeyer AO. Epididymal cystadenomas and epithelial tumorlets: effects of VHL deficiency on the human epididymis. J Pathol. 2006;210: 3241.
  • Glassberg KL. Renal dysgenesis and cystic disease of the kidney. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, Wein AJ, eds. Campbell's Urology. 8th ed. New York: Saunders; 2002; 19251994.
  • Goodman FR, Bacchelli C., Brody AF, Brueton LA, Fryne JP. NovelHoxa-13 mutations and phenotypic spectrum of hand-foot-genital syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;76: 197200.
  • Gottwald U., Davies B., Fritsch M., Habenicht UF. New approaches for male fertility control: HE6 as an example of a putative target. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2006;250: 4957.
  • Habenicht UF. Industry perspective on contraceptive development. In: Hinton BT, Turner TT, eds. The Third International Conference on the Epididymis. Charlottesville, VA: The Van Doren Company; 2003; 203207.
  • Hall SH, Hamil KG, French FS. Host defense proteins in the male reproductive tract. J Androl. 2002;23: 585597.
  • Hall SH, Yenugu S., Radhakrishnan Y., Avellar MC, Petrusz P., French FS. Characterization and functions of beta defensins in the epididymis. Asian J Androl. 2007;9: 453462.
  • Hamilton DW. The epididymis as a possible site for control of fertility in the male. Adv Biosci. 1972;10: 127144.
  • Harris A., Chalkley G., Goodman S., Coleman L.. Expression of the cystic fibrosis gene in human development. Development. 1991;113: 305310.
  • Hess RA. The efferent ductules: structure and formation. In: Robaire B., Hinton BT, eds. The Epididymis: From Molecules to Clinical Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2002; 4980.
  • Hess RA. Estrogen in the adult male reproductive tract: a review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003;1: 152.
  • Hinton BT. The blood-epididymis barrier. In: Lobl TJ, Hafez ESE, eds. Male Fertility and its Regulation. Boston: MTD Press Ltd; 1985; 371382.
  • Hinton BT. The epididymal microenvironment: a site of attack for a male contraceptive? Invest Urol. 1980;18: 110.
  • Hinton BT, Keefer DA. Binding of 3H-aldosterone to a single population of cells within the rat epididymis. J Steroid Biochem. 1985;23: 231237.
  • Hinton BT, Setchell BP. Fluid movement in the seminiferous tubules and the epididymal duct of the rat. J Physiol. 1978;284: 16P17P.
  • Hinton BT, Lan ZJ, Rudolph DB, Labus JC, Lye RJ. Testicular regulation of epididymal gene expression. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1998;53: 4757.
  • Hinton BT, Palladino MA, Rudolph D., Labus JC. The epididymis as protector of maturing spermatozoa. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1995;7: 731745.
  • Howards SS, Jessee SJ, Johnson AL. Micropuncture studies of the blood-seminiferous tubule barrier. Biol Reprod. 1976;14: 264269.
  • Hsieh-Li HM, Witte DP, Weinstein M., Branford W., Li H., Small K., Potter SS. Hoxa-11 structure, extensive antisense transcription, and function in male and female fertility. Development. 1995;121: 13731385.
  • Hunter RH, Holtz W., Henfrey PJ. Epididymal function in the boar in relation to the fertilizing ability of spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil. 1976;46: 463466.
  • Jaakola M.. Regional variations in transport of the luminal contents of the rat epididymis in vivo. J Reprod Fertil. 1983;68: 465470.
  • Jaakola UM, Talo A.. Relation of electrical activity to luminal transport in the cauda epididymis of the rat in vitro. J Reprod Fertil. 1982;64: 121126.
  • Jelinsky SA, Turner TT, Bang HJ, Finger JN, Solarz MK, Wilson E., Brown EL, Kopf GS, Johnston DS. The rat epididymal transcriptome: comparison of segmental gene expression in the rat and mouse epididymides. Biol Reprod. 2007;76: 561570.
  • Jocelyn HD, Setchell BP. Regnier de Graaf on the human reproductive organs. J Reprod Fertil. 1972; (suppl 17): 176.
  • Johnson AL, Howards SS. Intratubular hydrostatic pressure in testis and epididymis before and after long-term vasectomy in the guinea pig. Biol Reprod. 1976;14: 371376.
  • Johnson AL, Howards SS. Intratubular hydrostatic pressure in testis and epididymis before and after vasectomy. Am J Physiol. 1975;228: 556564.
  • Johnson L., Varner DD. Effect of daily sperm production but not age on transit times of spermatozoa through the human epididymis. Biol Reprod. 1988;39: 812817.
  • Jones RC, Murdoch RN. Regulation of the motility and metabolism of spermatozoa for storage in the epididymis of eutherian and marsupial mammals. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1996;8: 553568.
  • Jonte G., Holstein AF. On the morphology from the transition zones from the rete testis into the ductuli efferentes and from the ductuli efferentes into the ductus epididymidis—investigations on the human testis and epididymis. Andrologia. 1978;19: 398412.
  • Kirchhoff C.. Human epididymis-specific gene expression. ANIOR-ANIR. 2007;9: 2942.
  • Koff WJ, Scaletscky R.. Malformations of the epididymis in undescended testis. J Urol. 1990;143: 340343.
  • Kolon TF, Weiner JS, Lewitton M., Roth DR, Gonzales ET, Lamb DJ. Analysis of homeobox gene hoxa-10 mutations in cryptorchidism. J Urol. 1999;161: 227280.
  • Kroovand RL, Perlmutter AD. Congenital anomalies of the vas deferens and epididymis. In: Kogan SJ, Hafez ESE, eds. Pediatric Andrology. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1981; 173180.
  • Kucukaydin M., Ozokutan BH, Turan C., Okur H., Kose O.. Malformation of the epididymis in undescended testis. Pediatr Surg Int. 1998;14: 189191.
  • Lacham O., Trounson A.. Fertilizing capacity of epididymal and testicular spermatozoa microinjected under the zona pellucida of the mouse oocyte. Mol Reprod Dev. 1991;29: 8593.
  • Lan ZJ, Labus JC, Hinton BT. Regulation of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase catalytic activity and protein level in the initial segment of the rat epididymis by testicular factors: role of basic fibroblast growth factor. Biol Reprod. 1998;58: 197206.
  • Leewenhoek A.. De natis semine genitali animalcules. Philos Trans R Soc Lond. 1678;12: 1040.
  • Leung PS, Wong TP, Lam SY, Chan HC, Wong PYD. Testicular hormonal regulation of the renin-angiotensin system in the rat epididymis. Life Sci. 2000;66: 13171324.
  • Levine N., Marsh DJ. Micropuncture studies of the electrochemical aspects of fluid and electrolyte transport in individual seminiferous tubules, the epididymis, and vas deferens. J Physiol. 1971;215: 557570.
  • Lipshultz LI, Howards SS, Busch JP. Male infertility. In: Gillenwater JY, Grayhack JT, Howards SS, Duckett JW, eds. Adult and Pediatric Urology. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1987; 12451296.
  • Lundwall A.. Novel epididymal proteins with antimicrobial and protease-regulating properties. ANHP-ANIR. 2007;9: 4952.
  • Lupien M., Dievart A., Morales CR, Calvo E., Kay DG, Hu C., Jolicoeur P.. Expression of constitutively active Notch 1 in male genital tracts result in ectopic growth and blockage of efferent ducts, epididymal hyperplasia and sterility. Dev Biol. 2006;300: 497511.
  • Marmar JL, Corson SL, Batzer FR, Gocial B., Go K.. Microsurgical aspiration of sperm from the epididymis. A mobile program. J Urol. 1993;149: 13681373.
  • Migel MPD, Marino JM, Peramato PG, Nistal M., Regadera J.. Epididymal growth and differentiation are altered in human cryptorchidism. J Androl. 2001;22: 212225.
  • Mollaeian M., Mehrabi V., Elahi B.. Significance of epididymal and ductal anomalies associated with undescended testis: study of 652 cases. Urology. 1994;43: 857860.
  • Moore CA, Lockett BL, Lennox KW, McAmich JW, Wurster JC, Ceccarelli FE, Gangai MP. Prednisone in the treatment of acute epididymitis: a cooperative study. J Urol. 1971;106: 578580.
  • Moore HDM, Hartman TD, Pryor JP. Development of the oocyte penetrating capacity of spermatozoa in the human epididymis. Int J Androl. 1983;6: 310318.
  • Patrizio P., Salameh WAE. Expression of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mRNA in normal and pathological adult human epididymis. J Reprod Fertil. 1998;53: 262270.
  • Podlasek CA, Barnett DH, Clemens JQ, Bak PM, Bushman W.. Prostate development requires sonic hedgehog expressed by the urogenital sinus epithelium. Dev Biol. 1999;209: 2839.
  • Pollanen P., Cooper TG. Immunology of the testicular excurrent ducts. J Reprod Immunol. 1994;26: 167216.
  • Potts RJ, Jefferies TM, Notarianni LJ. Antioxidant capacity of the epididymis. Hum Reprod. 1999;14: 25132516.
  • Pozza D., Masci P., Amodeo S., Marchionni L.. Papillary cystadenoma of the epididymis as a cause of obstructive azoospermia. Urol Int. 1994;53: 222224.
  • Qui Y., Yang DT, Wang SM, Sun HQ, Jia YF. Successful pregnancy and birth after intrauterine insemination using caput epididymal sperm by percutaneous aspiration. Asian J Androl. 2003;5: 7375.
  • Reid BL, Cleland KW. The structure and function of the epididymis: histology of the rat epididymis. Aust J Zool. 1957;5: 223246.
  • Robaire B., Hinton BT, eds. The Epididymis: From Molecules to Clinical Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2002.
  • Robaire B., Hinton BT, Orgebin-Crist MC. The epididymis. In: Neil JD, ed. Knobil and Neil's Physiology of Reproduction. 3rd ed. New York: Elsevier; 2006; 10711148.
  • Schlegel PN, Berkley AS, Goldstein M., Cohen J., Alikani M., Adler A., Gilbert BR, Rozenwaks Z.. Epididymal micropuncture with in vitro fertilization and oocyte manipulation for treatment of surgically unreconstructable vasal obstruction. Fertil Steril. 1994;61: 895901.
  • Schlegel PN, Goldstein M.. Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: refinements and results. J Urol. 1993;150: 11651168.
  • Schoysman RJ, Bedford JM. The role of human epididymis in sperm maturation and sperm storage. Fertil Steril. 1986;46: 293299.
  • Setchell BP. Secretions of the testis and epididymis. J Reprod Fertil. 1974;37: 165177.
  • Silber SJ. Apparent fertility of human spermatozoa from the caput epididymidis. J Androl. 1989;10: 262269.
  • Silber SJ. Pregnancy caused by sperm from the vasa efferentia. Fertil Steril. 1988;49: 373375.
  • Silber SJ, Ord T., Balmaceda J., Patrizio P., Asch RH. Congenital absence of the vas deferens. The fertilizing capacity of human epididymal sperm. N Engl J Med. 1990;323: 17881792.
  • Sullivan R., Frenette G., Lessard C., Légaré C.. Sperm antigen acquisition in the epididymis: a role for epididymosomes. In: Hinton BT, Turner TT, eds. The Third International Conference on the Epididymis. Charlottesville: The Van Doren Company; 2003; 130136.
  • Tizzano EF, Chitayat D., Buchwald M.. Cell specific localization of CFTR mRNA shows developmentally regulated expression in human fetal tissues. Hum Mol Genet. 1993;2: 219224.
  • Tizzano EF, Silver MM, Chitayat D., Benichou JC, Buchwald M.. Differential cellular expression of cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator in human reproductive tissues. Clues for the infertility in patients with cystic fibrosis. Am J Pathol. 1994;144: 906914.
  • Toshimori K.. Biology of spermatozoa maturation: an overview with an introduction to this issue. Microsc Res Tech. 2003;61: 16.
  • Tracy CR, Steers WD. Anatomy, physiology and diseases of the epididymis. AUA Update. 2007;26: 114123.
  • Turek PJ, Ewalt DH, Snyder HM, Duckett JW. Normal epididymal anatomy in boys. J Urol. 1994;151: 726727.
  • Turner TT. Necessity's potion: Inorganic ions and small organic molecules in the epididymal lumen. In: Robaire B., Hinton BT, eds. The Epididymis: From Molecules to Clinical Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2002; 131150.
  • Turner TT. On the epididymis and its role in the development of the fertile ejaculate. J Androl. 1995;516: 292298.
  • Turner TT, Bang HJ, Attipoe SA, Johnston DS, Tomsig JL. Sonic hedgehog pathway inhibition alters epididymal function as assessed by the development of sperm motility. J Androl. 2006a;27: 225232.
  • Turner TT, Bomgardner D., Jacobs JP. Sonic hedgehog pathway genes are expressed and transcribed in the adult mouse epididymis. J Androl. 2004;25: 514522.
  • Turner TT, Cesarini DM. The ability of the rat epididymis to concentrate spermatozoa. J Androl. 1983;3: 197202.
  • Turner TT, Gleavy JL, Harris JM. Fluid movement in the lumen of the rat epididymis: effect of vasectomy and subsequent vasovasostomy. J Androl. 1990;11: 422428.
  • Turner TT, Johnston DS, Finger JN, Jelinsky SA. Differential gene expression among the proximal segments of the rat epididymis is lost after efferent duct ligation. Biol Reprod. 2007;77: 165171.
  • Turner TT, Johnston DS, Jelinsky SA. Epididymal genomics and the search for a male contraceptive. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2006b;250: 178183.
  • Turner TT, Riley TA, Vagnetti M., Flickinger CJ, Caldwell JA, Hunt DF. Postvasectomy alterations in protein synthesis and secretion in the rat caput epididymidis are not repaired after vasovasostomy. J Androl. 2000;21: 276290.
  • Wang YF, Holstein AF. Intraepithelial lymphocytes and macrophages in the human epididymis. Cell Tissue Res. 1983;233: 517521.
  • Weiske WH. Minimal invasive vasektomie mittels fulguratioinstechnik. Erfahrungen bei 1000 patienten in 12 jahren. Urologe. 1994;34: 448452.
  • Wetterauer U.. Recommended biochemical parameters for routine semen analysis. Urol Res. 1986;14: 241246.
  • Wong PYD. CFTR gene and male fertility. Mol Hum Reprod. 1998;4: 107110.
  • Wong PYD, Au CL, Ngai HK. Electrolyte and water transport in rat epididymis: its possible role in sperm maturation. Int J Androl. 1978;1: 608628.
  • Wong PYD, Gong XD, Leung GPH, Cheuk BLY. Formation of the epididymal fluid microenvironment. In: Robaire B., Hinton BT, eds. The Epididymis: From Molecules to Clinical Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2002; 119130.
  • Wong PYD, Yeung CH. Hormonal control of fluid reabsorption in isolated rat cauda epididymis. Endocrinology. 1977;101: 13911397.
  • Yeung CH, Cooper TG, Bergmann M., Schulze H.. Organization of the tubules in the human caput epididymidis and the ultrastructure of their epithelia. Am J Anat. 1991;191: 261279.
  • Yeung CH, Cooper TG, Oberpenning F., Schulze H., Nieschlag E.. Changes in movement characteristics of human spermatozoa along the length of the epididymis. Biol Reprod. 1993;49: 274280.
  • Young WC. A study of the function of the epididymis I. Is the attainment of the full spermatozoon maturity attributable to some specific action of the epididymal secretion? J Morphol. 1929a;47: 479495.
  • Young WC. A study of the function of the epididymis II. The importance of the aging process of the sperm for the length of the period during which fertilizing capacity is retained by sperm isolated in the epididymis of the guinea pig. J Morphol. 1929b;48: 475291.
  • Young WC. A study of the function of the epididymis III. Functional changes undergone by spermatozoa during their passage through the epididymis and vas deferens in the guinea pig. J Exp Biol. 1931;8: 151162.
  1. Supported by NIH grant P50-DK45179.