Bio-Economics of Large-Scale Eradication of Feral Goats From Santiago Island, Galápagos

Authors

  • FELIPE CRUZ,

    1. Galápagos National Park Service, Puerto Ayora, Isla Santa Cruz, Galápagos, Ecuador, and Charles Darwin Foundation, Casilla 17-013891 Quito, Ecuador
    Search for more papers by this author
  • VICTOR CARRION,

    1. Galápagos National Park Service, Puerto Ayora, Isla Santa Cruz, Galápagos, Ecuador
    Search for more papers by this author
  • KARL J. CAMPBELL,

    1. Galápagos National Park Service, Puerto Ayora, Isla Santa Cruz, Galápagos, Ecuador, and Charles Darwin Foundation, Casilla 17-01-3891 Quito, Ecuador; School of Natural and Rural Systems Management, University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland 4343, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Island Conservation, 100 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA

  • CHRISTIAN LAVOIE,

    1. Galápagos National Park Service, Puerto Ayora, Isla Santa Cruz, Galápagos, Ecuador, and Charles Darwin Foundation, Casilla 17-01-3891 Quito, Ecuador; United Nations Development Program, Avenida Amazonas 2889, Quito, Ecuador
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202, USA

  • C. JOSH DONLAN

    Corresponding author
    1. Advanced Conservation Strategies, P.O. Box 1201, Midway, UT 84049, USA, and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-2701, USA
    Search for more papers by this author

jdonlan@advancedconservation.org

Abstract

ABSTRACT  Invasive mammals are premier drivers of extinction and ecosystem change, particularly on islands. In the 1960s, conservation practitioners started developing techniques to eradicate invasive mammal populations from islands. Larger and more biologically complex islands are being targeted for restoration worldwide. We conducted a feral goat (Capra hircus) eradication campaign on Santiago Island in the Galápagos archipelago, which was an unprecedented advance in the ability to reverse biodiversity impacts by invasive species. We removed >79,000 goats from Santiago Island (58,465 ha) in <4.5 years, at an approximate cost of US$6.1 million. An eradication ethic combined with a suite of techniques and technologies made eradication possible. A field-based Geographic Information System facilitated an adaptive management strategy, including adjustment and integration of hunting methods. Specialized ground hunting techniques with dogs removed most of the goat population. Aerial hunting by helicopter and Judas goat techniques were also critical. Mata Hari goats, sterilized female Judas goats induced into a long-term estrus, removed males from the remnant feral population at an elevated rate, which likely decreased the length and cost of the eradication campaign. The last 1,000 goats cost US$2.0 million to remove; we spent an additional US$467,064 on monitoring to confirm eradication. Aerial hunting is cost-effective even in countries where labor is inexpensive. Local sociopolitical environments and best practices emerging from large-scale, fast-paced eradications should drive future strategies. For nonnative ungulate eradications, island size is arguably no longer the limiting factor. Future challenges will involve removing invasive mammals from large inhabited islands while increasing cost-effectiveness of removing low-density populations and confirming eradication. Those challenges will require leveraging technology and applying theory from other disciplines, along with conservation practitioners working alongside sociologists and educators.

Ancillary