• Open Access

Scientific Opinion supplementing the conclusions of the environmental risk assessment and risk management recommendations on the genetically modified insect resistant maize 1507 for cultivation


  • EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)

  • Panel members: Salvatore Arpaia, Andrew Nicholas Edmund Birch, Andrew Chesson, Patrick du Jardin, Achim Gathmann, Jürgen Gropp, Lieve Herman, Hilde-Gunn Hoen-Sorteberg, Huw Jones, Jozsef Kiss, Gijs Kleter, Pagona Lagiou, Martinus Lovik, Antoine Messéan, Hanspeter Naegeli, Kaare M. Nielsen, Jaroslava Ovesná, Joe Perry, Nils Rostoks, Christoph Tebbe.
  • Correspondence: gmo@efsa.europa.eu
  • Acknowledgement: The Panel wishes to thank the members of the Standing ‘Environment’ Working Group on GMO applications: Salvatore Arpaia, Detlef Bartsch, Andrew Nicholas Edmund Birch, Achim Gathmann, Jozsef Kiss, Antoine Messéan, Joe Perry, Jeremy Sweet, Christoph Tebbe, for the preparatory work on this scientific opinion and EFSA staff: Yann Devos, Andrea Gennaro and Sylvie Mestdagh, for the support provided to this scientific opinion.
  • Adoption date: 18 October 2012
  • Published date: 6 November 2012
  • Question number: EFSA-Q-2012-00819
  • On request from: European Commission


The EFSA GMO Panel was asked by the European Commission to apply its mathematical model to simulate and assess potential adverse effects resulting from the exposure of non-target Lepidoptera to maize 1507 pollen under hypothetical agricultural conditions, and to provide information on the factors affecting the insect resistance management plan, additional to that in its 2011 Scientific Opinion updating the conclusions of the environmental risk assessment and risk management recommendations on maize 1507. Here, risk managers are provided with additional evidence and further clarifications to those previous conclusions and risk management recommendations. This Scientific Opinion provides background scientific information to inform the decision-making processes; the EFSA GMO Panel reiterates that risk managers should choose risk mitigation and management measures that are proportionate to the level of identified risk according to the protection goals pertaining to their regions.