• 1
    Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008; 58: 7196.
  • 2
    RiesL, MelbertD, KrapchoM, et al. (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2004. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2007.
  • 3
    Espey DK, Wu XC, Swan J, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2004, featuring cancer in American Indians and Alaska Natives. Cancer 2007; 110: 21192152.
  • 4
    Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP, Jr, Weiss NS. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 653657.
  • 5
    Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 1996; 348: 14721477.
  • 6
    Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, et al. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet 1996; 348: 14671471.
  • 7
    Mandel JS, Church TR, Bond JH, et al. The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 16031607.
  • 8
    Meissner HI, Breen N, Klabunde CN, Vernon SW. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15: 389394.
  • 9
    Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. Cancer screening in the United States, 2007: a review of current guidelines, practices, and prospects. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57: 90104.
  • 10
    O'Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, et al. The National Polyp Study. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 1990; 98: 371379.
  • 11
    Bond JH. Colon polyps and cancer. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 2735.
  • 12
    Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 594642.
  • 13
    Winawer SJ. Natural history of colorectal cancer. Am J Med 1999; 106: 3s6S.
  • 14
    Lieberman DA, Weiss DG. One-time screening for colorectal cancer with combined fecal occult-blood testing and examination of the distal colon. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 555560.
  • 15
    Eddy D. ACS report on the cancer-related health checkup. CA Cancer J Clin 1980; 30: 193240.
  • 16
    Levin B, Murphy GP. Revision in American Cancer Society recommendations for the early detection of colorectal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 1992; 42: 296299.
  • 17
    Byers T, Levin B, Rothenberger D, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: update 1997. American Cancer Society Detection and Treatment Advisory Group on Colorectal Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 1997; 47: 154160.
  • 18
    Smith RA, von Eschenbach AC, Wender R, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: update of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers. Also: update 2001—testing for early lung cancer detection. CA Cancer J Clin 2001; 51: 3875.
  • 19
    Levin B, Brooks D, Smith RA, Stone A. Emerging technologies in screening for colorectal cancer: CT colonography, immunochemical fecal occult blood tests, and stool screening using molecular markers. CA Cancer J Clin 2003; 53: 4455.
  • 20
    US Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1996.
  • 21
    US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137: 129131.
  • 22
    Glick SN. Comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1728.
  • 23
    Heiken JP, Bree RL, Foley WD, et al. Colorectal cancer screening. American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2006.
  • 24
    Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale—update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 544560.
  • 25
    Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 18651871.
  • 26
    Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2006; 56: 143159.
  • 27
    Wee CC, McCarthy EP, Phillips RS. Factors associated with colon cancer screening: the role of patient factors and physician counseling. Prev Med 2005; 41: 2329.
  • 28
    Vernon SW. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89: 14061422.
  • 29
    Schroy PC 3rd. Heeren TC. Patient perceptions of stool-based DNA testing for colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med 2005; 28: 208214.
  • 30
    Tangka FK, Molinari NA, Chattopadhyay SK, Seeff LC. Market for colorectal cancer screening by endoscopy in the United States. Am J Prev Med 2005; 29: 5460.
  • 31
    Lafata JE, Divine G, Moon C, Williams LK. Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussions and screening use. Am J Prev Med 2006; 31: 202209.
  • 32
    Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137: 132141.
  • 33
    Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 13651371.
  • 34
    Wilson JMG, Junger G. Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1968.
  • 35
    Smith RA. Screening fundamentals. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1997; 22: 1519.
  • 36
    Shapiro S. Screening for secondary prevention of disease, in ArmenianHK, ShapiroS (eds). Epidemiology and Health Services. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998: 183206.
  • 37
    Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, et al. Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 27042714.
  • 38
    Collins JF, Lieberman DA, Durbin TE, Weiss DG. Accuracy of screening for fecal occult blood on a single stool sample obtained by digital rectal examination: a comparison with recommended sampling practice. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 8185.
  • 39
    Nadel MR, Shapiro JA, Klabunde CN, et al. A national survey of primary care physicians' methods for screening for fecal occult blood. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 8694.
  • 40
    Sox HC. Office-based testing for fecal occult blood: do only in case of emergency. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 146148.
  • 41
    Myers RE, Balshem AM, Wolf TA, et al. Adherence to continuous screening for colorectal neoplasia. Med Care 1993; 31: 508519.
  • 42
    Engelman KK, Ellerbeck EF, Ahluwalia JS, et al. Fecal occult blood test use by Kansas medicare beneficiaries. Prev Med 2001; 33: 622626.
  • 43
    Schattner A, Gilad A. Primary care physicians' awareness and implementation of screening guidelines for colorectal cancer. Prev Med 2002; 35: 447452.
  • 44
    American College of Radiology Imaging Network. ACRIN Protocol 6656. Computerized Tomographic Colonography: Performance Evaluation in a Multicenter Setting. Available at: Accessed July 1, 2007.
  • 45
    Young GP, St John DJ. Selecting an occult blood test for use as a screening tool for large bowel cancer, in RozenP, ReichCB, WinawerSJ (eds). Frontiers of Gastrointestinal Research. Advances in Large Bowel Cancer: Policy, Prevention, Research and Treatment. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 1991: 135156.
  • 46
    Ransohoff DF, Lang CA. Screening for colorectal cancer with the fecal occult blood test: a background paper. American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 811822.
  • 47
    Allison JE, Tekawa IS, Ransom LJ, Adrain AL. A comparison of fecal occult-blood tests for colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 155159.
  • 48
    Simon JB. Occult blood screening for colorectal carcinoma: a critical review. Gastroenterology 1985; 88: 820837.
  • 49
    Allison JE, Sakoda LC, Levin TR, et al. Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99: 14621470.
  • 50
    Sinatra MA, Young GP, St John DJ, et al. A study of laboratory based faecal occult blood testing in Melbourne, Australia. The Faecal Occult Blood Testing Study Group. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998; 13: 396400.
  • 51
    Adams EC, Layman KM. Immunochemical confirmation of gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Clin Lab Sci 1974; 4: 343349.
  • 52
    Newman L. Medicare coverage group assesses effectiveness of new technologies. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93: 805806.
  • 53
    Caligiore P, Macrae FA, St John DJ, et al. Peroxidase levels in food: relevance to colorectal cancer screening. Am J Clin Nutr 1982; 35: 14871489.
  • 54
    Gopalswamy N, Stelling HP, Markert RJ, et al. A comparative study of eight fecal occult blood tests and HemoQuant in patients in whom colonoscopy is indicated. Arch Fam Med 1994; 3: 10431048.
  • 55
    Greenberg PD, Bertario L, Gnauck R, et al. A prospective multicenter evaluation of new fecal occult blood tests in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 13311338.
    Direct Link:
  • 56
    Wong BC, Wong WM, Cheung KL, et al. A sensitive guaiac faecal occult blood test is less useful than an immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening in a Chinese population. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 18: 941946.
  • 57
    Smith A, Young GP, Cole SR, Bampton P. Comparison of a brush-sampling fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin with a sensitive guaiac-based fecal occult blood test in detection of colorectal neoplasia. Cancer 2006; 107: 21522159.
  • 58
    Levi Z, Rozen P, Hazazi R, et al. A quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood test for colorectal neoplasia. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146: 244255.
  • 59
    Morikawa T, Kato J, Yamaji Y, et al. A comparison of the immunochemical fecal occult blood test and total colonoscopy in the asymptomatic population. Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 422428.
  • 60
    Cole SR, Young GP, Esterman A, et al. A randomised trial of the impact of new faecal haemoglobin test technologies on population participation in screening for colorectal cancer. J Med Screen 2003; 10: 117122.
  • 61
    Nakama H, Yamamoto M, Kamijo N, et al. Colonoscopic evaluation of immunochemical fecal occult blood test for detection of colorectal neoplasia. Hepatogastroenterology 1999; 46: 228231.
  • 62
    Sidransky D, Tokino T, Hamilton SR, et al. Identification of ras oncogene mutations in the stool of patients with curable colorectal tumors. Science 1992; 256: 102105.
  • 63
    Whitney D, Skoletsky J, Moore K, et al. Enhanced retrieval of DNA from human fecal samples results in improved performance of colorectal cancer screening test. J Mol Diagn 2004; 6: 386395.
  • 64
    Olson J, Whitney DH, Durkee K, Shuber AP. DNA stabilization is critical for maximizing performance of fecal DNA-based colorectal cancer tests. Diagn Mol Pathol 2005; 14: 183191.
  • 65
    Ahlquist DA, Skoletsky JE, Boynton KA, et al. Colorectal cancer screening by detection of altered human DNA in stool: feasibility of a multitarget assay panel. Gastroenterology 2000; 119: 12191227.
  • 66
    Calistri D, Rengucci C, Bocchini R, et al. Fecal multiple molecular tests to detect colorectal cancer in stool. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003; 1: 377383.
  • 67
    Tagore KS, Lawson MJ, Yucaitis JA, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of a stool DNA multitarget assay panel for the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2003; 3: 4753.
  • 68
    Brand RE, Ross ME, Shuber AP. Reproducibility of a multitarget stool-based DNA assay for colorectal cancer detection. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 13381341.
    Direct Link:
  • 69
    Syngal S, Stoffel E, Chung D, et al. Detection of stool DNA mutations before and after treatment of colorectal neoplasia. Cancer 2006; 106: 277283.
  • 70
    Itzkowitz SH, Jandorf L, Brand R, et al. Improved fecal DNA test for colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 111117.
  • 71
    Schroy PC 3rd. Lal S, Glick JT, et al. Patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening: how does stool DNA testing fare? Am J Manag Care 2007; 13: 393400.
  • 72
    Berger BM, Schroy PC 3rd, Rosenberg JL, et al. Colorectal cancer screening using stool DNA analysis in clinical practice: early clinical experience with respect to patient acceptance and colonoscopic follow-up of abnormal tests. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2006; 5: 338343.
  • 73
    Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Wilschut J, et al. Cost-Effectiveness of DNA Stool Testing to Screen for Colorectal Cancer: Report to AHRQ and CMS from the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) for MISCAN and SimCRC Models. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Quality and Research; 2007: 184.
  • 74
    Osborn NK, Ahlquist DA. Stool screening for colorectal cancer: molecular approaches. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 192206.
  • 75
    Woolf SH. A smarter strategy? Reflections on fecal DNA screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 27552758.
  • 76
    Kutzner N, Hoffmann I, Linke C, et al. Non-invasive detection of colorectal tumours by the combined application of molecular diagnosis and the faecal occult blood test. Cancer Lett 2005; 229: 3341.
  • 77
    Levin TR, Farraye FA, Schoen RE, et al. Quality in the technical performance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: recommendations of an international multi-society task group. Gut 2005; 54: 807813.
  • 78
    Newcomb PA, Norfleet RG, Storer BE, et al. Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992; 84: 15721575.
  • 79
    Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff GS, Sauar J, et al. Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Telemark Polyp Study I. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999; 34: 414420.
  • 80
    Newcomb PA, Storer BE, Morimoto LM, et al. Long-term efficacy of sigmoidoscopy in the reduction of colorectal cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95: 622625.
  • 81
    UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial Investigators. Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 12911300.
  • 82
    Segnan N, Senore C, Andreoni B, et al. Baseline findings of the Italian multicenter randomized controlled trial of “once-only sigmoidoscopy”—SCORE. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 17631772.
  • 83
    Gondal G, Grotmol T, Hofstad B, et al. The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) screening study: baseline findings and implementations for clinical work-up in age groups 50–64 years. Scand J Gastroenterol 2003; 38: 635642.
  • 84
    Weissfeld JL, Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, et al. Flexible sigmoidoscopy in the PLCO cancer screening trial: results from the baseline screening examination of a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 989997.
  • 85
    Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, et al. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 169174.
  • 86
    Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 162168.
  • 87
    Levin TR, Palitz A, Grossman S, et al. Predicting advanced proximal colonic neoplasia with screening sigmoidoscopy. JAMA 1999; 281: 16111617.
  • 88
    Schoenfeld P, Cash B, Flood A, et al. Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 20612068.
  • 89
    Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E, et al. Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 18631872.
  • 90
    Cordice JW, Jr, Johnson H Jr. Anatomic distribution of colonic cancers in middle-class black Americans. J Natl Med Assoc 1991; 83: 730732.
  • 91
    Nelson RL, Dollear T, Freels S, Persky V. The relation of age, race, and gender to the subsite location of colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 1997; 80: 193197.
  • 92
    Francois F, Park J, Bini EJ. Colon pathology detected after a positive screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: a prospective study in an ethnically diverse cohort. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 823830.
    Direct Link:
  • 93
    Theuer CP, Taylor TH, Brewster WR, et al. The topography of colorectal cancer varies by race/ethnicity and affects the utility of flexible sigmoidoscopy. Am Surg 2001; 67: 11571161.
  • 94
    Atkin W, Rogers P, Cardwell C, et al. Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 12471256.
  • 95
    Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, et al. Results of repeat sigmoidoscopy 3 years after a negative examination. JAMA 2003; 290: 4148.
  • 96
    Doria-Rose VP, Newcomb PA, Levin TR. Incomplete screening flexible sigmoidoscopy associated with female sex, age, and increased risk of colorectal cancer. Gut 2005; 54: 12731278.
  • 97
    Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, Pinsky PF, Riley T. Yield of advanced adenoma and cancer based on polyp size detected at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 16831689.
  • 98
    Levin TR, Zhao W, Conell C, et al. Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 880886.
  • 99
    Bini EJ, Unger JS, Rieber JM, et al. Prospective, randomized, single-blind comparison of two preparations for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 218222.
  • 100
    Zubarik R, Ganguly E, Benway D, et al. Procedure-related abdominal discomfort in patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 30563061.
    Direct Link:
  • 101
    Pinsky PF, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, et al. Variability in flexible sigmoidoscopy performance among examiners in a screening trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3: 792797.
  • 102
    Levin TR, Conell C, Shapiro JA, et al. Complications of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 2002; 123: 17861792.
  • 103
    Gross CP, Andersen MS, Krumholz HM, et al. Relation between Medicare screening reimbursement and stage at diagnosis for older patients with colon cancer. JAMA 2006; 296: 28152822.
  • 104
    Seeff LC, Richards TB, Shapiro JA, et al. How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 16701677.
  • 105
    Lewis JD, Asch DA. Barriers to office-based screening sigmoidoscopy: does reimbursement cover costs? Ann Intern Med 1999; 130: 525530.
  • 106
    Palitz AM, Selby JV, Grossman S, et al. The Colon Cancer Prevention Program (CoCaP): rationale, implementation, and preliminary results. HMO Pract 1997; 11: 512.
  • 107
    Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, Bratcher LL. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 16961700.
    Direct Link:
  • 108
    Takahashi Y, Tanaka H, Kinjo M, Sakumoto K. Sedation-free colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 855859.
  • 109
    Muller AD, Sonnenberg A. Prevention of colorectal cancer by flexible endoscopy and polypectomy. A case-control study of 32,702 veterans. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 904910.
  • 110
    Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 19771981.
  • 111
    Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R, et al. Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut 2001; 48: 812815.
  • 112
    Robertson DJ, Greenberg ER, Beach M, et al. Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 3441.
  • 113
    Alberts DS, Martinez ME, Roe DJ, et al. Lack of effect of a high-fiber cereal supplement on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Phoenix Colon Cancer Prevention Physicians' Network. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 11561162.
  • 114
    Schatzkin A, Lanza E, Corle D, et al. Lack of effect of a low-fat, high-fiber diet on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Polyp Prevention Trial Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 11491155.
  • 115
    Leard LE, Savides TJ, Ganiats TG. Patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening. J Fam Pract 1997; 45: 211218.
  • 116
    Ling BS, Moskowitz MA, Wachs D, et al. Attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening tests. J Gen Intern Med 2001; 16: 822830.
  • 117
    Mysliwiec PA, Brown ML, Klabunde CN, Ransohoff DF. Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 264271.
  • 118
    Pabby A, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, et al. Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 385391.
  • 119
    Farrar WD, Sawhney MS, Nelson DB, et al. Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 12591264.
  • 120
    Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 2428.
  • 121
    Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, et al. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 352359.
  • 122
    Bressler B, Paszat LF, Vinden C, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 452456.
  • 123
    Gatto NM, Frucht H, Sundararajan V, et al. Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95: 230236.
  • 124
    Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 12961308.
    Direct Link:
  • 125
    Faigel DO, Pike IM, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: an introduction. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 866872.
    Direct Link:
  • 126
    Lieberman D, Nadel M, Smith RA, et al. Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 757766.
  • 127
    Harewood GC, Lieberman DA. Colonoscopy practice patterns since introduction of Medicare coverage for average-risk screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 7277.
  • 128
    Levin TR. Colonoscopy capacity: Can we build it? Will they come? Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 18411844.
  • 129
    Ladabaum U, Song K, Fendrick AM. Colorectal neoplasia screening with virtual colonoscopy: when, at what cost, and with what national impact? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 554563.
  • 130
    Vijan S, Inadomi J, Hayward RA, et al. Projections of demand and capacity for colonoscopy related to increasing rates of colorectal cancer screening in the United States. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 20: 507515.
  • 131
    Boolchand V, Olds G, Singh J, et al. Colorectal screening after polypectomy: a national survey study of primary care physicians. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 654659.
  • 132
    Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003; 53: 2743.
  • 133
    Glick SN, Ralls PW, Balfe DM, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology 2000; 215(suppl): 231237.
  • 134
    Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests: Conditions for and Limitations on Coverage, 62 Federal Register 410.37 (1997).
  • 135
    Glick S. Double-contrast barium enema for colorectal cancer screening: a review of the issues and a comparison with other screening alternatives. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 15291537.
  • 136
    de Zwart IM, Griffioen G, Shaw MP, et al. Barium enema and endoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia: sensitivity, specificity, complications and its determinants. Clin Radiol 2001; 56: 401409.
  • 137
    Kelvin FM, Gardiner R, Vas W, Stevenson GW. Colorectal carcinoma missed on double contrast barium enema study: a problem in perception. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981; 137: 307313.
  • 138
    Thorpe CD, Grayson DJ, Jr, Wingfield PB. Detection of carcinoma of the colon and rectum by air contrast enema. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981; 152: 307309.
  • 139
    Fork FT, Lindström C, Ekelund G. Double contrast examination in carcinoma of the colon and rectum. A prospective clinical series. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1983; 24: 177188.
  • 140
    Johnson CD, Carlson HC, Taylor WF, Weiland LP. Barium enemas of carcinoma of the colon: sensitivity of double- and single-contrast studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983; 140: 11431149.
  • 141
    Reiertsen O, Bakka A, Tronnes S, Gauperaa T. Routine double contrast barium enema and fiberoptic colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma. Acta Chir Scand 1988; 154: 5355.
  • 142
    Thomas RD, Fairhurst JJ, Frost RA. Wessex regional radiology audit: barium enema in colo-rectal carcinoma. Clin Radiol 1995; 50: 647650.
  • 143
    Rex DK, Rahmani EY, Haseman JH, et al. Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 1723.
  • 144
    Strøm E, Larsen JL. Colon cancer at barium enema examination and colonoscopy: a study from the county of Hordaland, Norway. Radiology 1999; 211: 211214.
  • 145
    Gillespie JS, Kelly BE. Double contrast barium enema and colorectal carcinoma: sensitivity and potential role in screening. Ulster Med J 2001; 70: 1518.
  • 146
    McDonald S, Lyall P, Israel L, et al. Why barium enemas fail to identify colorectal cancers. ANZ J Surg 2001; 71: 631633.
  • 147
    Connolly DJ, Traill ZC, Reid HS, et al. The double contrast barium enema: a retrospective single centre audit of the detection of colorectal carcinomas. Clin Radiol 2002; 57: 2932.
  • 148
    Leslie A, Virjee JP. Detection of colorectal carcinoma on double contrast barium enema when double reporting is routinely performed: an audit of current practice. Clin Radiol 2002; 57: 184187.
  • 149
    Tan KY, Seow-Choen F, Ng C, et al. Which colorectal cancers are missed by double contrast barium enema? Tech Coloproctol 2004; 8: 169172.
  • 150
    Tawn DJ, Squire CJ, Mohammed MA, Adam EJ. National audit of the sensitivity of double-contrast barium enema for colorectal carcinoma, using control charts: For the Royal College of Radiologists Clinical Radiology Audit Sub-Committee. Clin Radiol 2005; 60: 558564.
  • 151
    Williams CB, Macrae FA, Bartram CI. A prospective study of diagnostic methods in adenoma follow-up. Endoscopy 1982; 14: 7478.
  • 152
    Winawer SJ, Stewart ET, Zauber AG, et al. A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. National Polyp Study Work Group. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 17661772.
  • 153
    Zauber AG, Winawer S, Stewart ET. Author reply. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 17291730.
  • 154
    Blakeborough A, Sheridan MB, Chapman AH. Complications of barium enema examinations: a survey of UK Consultant Radiologists 1992 to 1994. Clin Radiol 1997; 52: 142148.
  • 155
    American College of Radiology. Appropriateness Criteria for the Barium Enema. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2004.
  • 156
    El-Serag HB, Petersen L, Hampel H, et al. The use of screening colonoscopy for patients cared for by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 22022208.
  • 157
    Ferrucci JT. Double-contrast barium enema: use in practice and implications for CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 170173.
  • 158
    Robertson RH, Burkhardt JH, Powell MP, et al. Trends in colon cancer screening procedures in the US Medicare and Tricare populations: 1999–2001. Prev Med 2006; 42: 460462.
  • 159
    Zalis ME, Perumpillichira J, Del Frate C, Hahn PF. CT colonography: digital subtraction bowel cleansing with mucosal reconstruction initial observations. Radiology 2003; 226: 911917.
  • 160
    Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 13001311.
  • 161
    Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Marrannes J, et al. CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 18361842.
  • 162
    Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, et al. Detection of colorectal polyps with CT colography: initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity. Radiology 1997; 205: 5965.
  • 163
    Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC 3rd. et al. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 14961503.
  • 164
    Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, et al. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 2001; 219: 685692.
  • 165
    Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 2004; 291: 17131719.
  • 166
    Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 2005; 365: 305311.
  • 167
    Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 21912200.
  • 168
    Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 2005; 237: 893904.
  • 169
    Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 635650.
  • 170
    Cash B, Kim C, Cullen P, et al. Accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals [abstract]. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: A46. Abstract 278.
  • 171
    Graser A, Kolligs F, Kramer H, et al. Results from the “Munich Colorectal Cancer Prevention Trial”: comparison of low-dose 64-MDCT colonography and video colonoscopy in a screening population [abstract]. Presented at: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology/Society of Gastrointestinal Radiologists; June 19–23, 2006; Crete, Greece. European Radiology Supplements 2006; 26(suppl): C19C27.
  • 172
    Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 14031412.
  • 173
    Knechtges PM, McFarland BG, Keysor KJ, et al. National and local trends in CT colonography reimbursement: past, present, and future. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4: 776799.
  • 174
    Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Kim DH, et al. Screening for colorectal neoplasia with CT colonography: initial experience from the 1st year of coverage by third-party payers. Radiology 2006; 241: 417425.
  • 175
    Fidler JL, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, et al. Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 2002; 27: 292300.
  • 176
    Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR. Flat colorectal lesions in asymptomatic adults: implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183: 13431347.
  • 177
    Bond JH. Doubling time of flat and polypoid colorectal neoplasms: defining the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 16211623.
  • 178
    Zauber AG, O'Brien MJ, Winawer SJ. On finding flat adenomas: is the search worth the gain? Gastroenterology 2002; 122: 839840.
  • 179
    Park SH, Lee SS, Choi EK, et al. Flat colorectal neoplasms: definition, importance, and visualization on CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 953959.
  • 180
    Gupta S, Durkalski V, Cotton P, Rockey DC. Variation of agreement in polyp size measurement between computed tomographic colonography and pathology assessment: clinical implications. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 220227.
  • 181
    Pickhardt PJ, Lee AD, McFarland EG, Taylor AJ. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays. Radiology 2005; 236: 872878.
  • 182
    Park SH, Choi EK, Lee SS, et al. Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens. Radiology 2007; 244: 157164.
  • 183
    Young BM, Fletcher JG, Paulsen SR, et al. Polyp measurement with CT colonography: multiple-reader, multiple-workstation comparison. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 122129.
  • 184
    Amis ES, Jr, Butler PF, Applegate KE, et al. American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4: 272284.
  • 185
    Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 22772284.
  • 186
    Ron E. Ionizing radiation and cancer risk: evidence from epidemiology. Radiat Res 1998; 150: S30S41.
  • 187
    Health Physics Society. Radiation Risk in Perspective. Position Statement of the Health Physics Society. McLean, VA: Health Physics Society; 2004. Available at: Accessed January 30, 2008.
  • 188
    Brenner DJ, Georgsson MA. Mass screening with CT colonography: should the radiation exposure be of concern? Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 328337.
  • 189
    Macari M, Bini EJ, Xue X, et al. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Radiology 2002; 224: 383392.
  • 190
    American College of Radiology. ACR Practice Guideline for the Performance of Computed Tomography (CT) Colonography in Adults. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2006.
  • 191
    Pickhardt PJ. Incidence of colonic perforation at CT colonography: review of existing data and implications for screening of asymptomatic adults. Radiology 2006; 239: 313316.
  • 192
    Burling D, Halligan S, Slater A, et al. Potentially serious adverse events at CT colonography in symptomatic patients: national survey of the United Kingdom. Radiology 2006; 239: 464471.
  • 193
    Sosna J, Blachar A, Amitai M, et al. Colonic perforation at CT colonography: assessment of risk in a multicenter large cohort. Radiology 2006; 239: 457463.
  • 194
    Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ. Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Radiology 2000; 215: 353357.
  • 195
    Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Wilson LA, et al. Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 911916.
  • 196
    Yee J, Kumar NN, Godara S, et al. Extracolonic abnormalities discovered incidentally at CT colonography in a male population. Radiology 2005; 236: 519526.
  • 197
    Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ. Extracolonic findings identified in asymptomatic adults at screening CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 718728.
  • 198
    Lieberman D. A call to action—measuring the quality of colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 25882589.
  • 199
    Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 2005; 236: 39.
  • 200
    Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Hoff G, Kay CL. Computed tomographic colonography for colorectal screening. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 545549.
  • 201
    Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ. Characteristics of advanced adenomas detected at CT colonographic screening: implications for appropriate polyp size thresholds for polypectomy versus surveillance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 940944.
  • 202
    Moravec M, Lieberman D, Holub J, et al. Rate of advanced pathologic features in 6–9mm polyps in patients referred for colonoscopy screening. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 822.
  • 203
    Rex DK, Lieberman D. ACG colorectal cancer prevention action plan: update on CT-colonography. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 14101413.
    Direct Link:
  • 204
    Rockey DC, Barish M, Brill JV, et al. Standards for gastroenterologists for performing and interpreting diagnostic computed tomographic colonography. Gastroenterology 2007; 133: 10051024.
  • 205
    Pignone M, Saha S, Hoerger T, Mandelblatt J. Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137: 96104.
  • 206
    Song K, Fendrick AM, Ladabaum U. Fecal DNA testing compared with conventional colorectal cancer screening methods: a decision analysis. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 12701279.
  • 207
    Wu GH, Wang YM, Yen AM, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening with stool DNA testing in intermediate-incidence countries. BMC Cancer 2006; 6: 136.
  • 208
    Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions. Cancer 2007; 109: 22132221.
  • 209
    Agrawal S, Bhupinderjit A, Bhutani MS, et al. Colorectal cancer in African Americans. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 515523.
    Direct Link:
  • 210
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 384 November 2007: colonoscopy and colorectal cancer screening and prevention. Obstet GyNecol 2007; 110: 11991202.