SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Seibert JA. One hundred years of medical diagnostic imaging technology. Health Phys. 1995; 69: 695-720.
  • 2
    Hall E, Giaccia AJ. Milestones in the radiation sciences. In: Radiobiology for the Radiologist. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006: 1-4.
  • 3
    Linet MS, Kim KP, Miller DL, Kleinerman RA, Simon SL, de Gonzalez AB. Historical review of occupational exposures and cancer risks in medical radiation workers. Radiat Res. 2010; 174: 793-808.
  • 4
    Haus AG. Historical technical developments in mammography. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2002; 1: 119-126.
  • 5
    Wang Y, Best DE, Hoffman JG, et al. ACR-NEMA digital imaging and communications standards: minimum requirements. Radiology. 1988; 166: 529-532.
  • 6
    Flohr TG, Ohnesorge BM. Imaging of the heart with computed tomography. Basic Res Cardiol. 2008; 103: 161-173.
  • 7
    Frieben A. Demonstration eines Cancroids des rechten Handruckens, das sich nach langdauernder Einwirkung von Rontgenstrahlen entwickelt hatte. Fortsch Roentgenstr. 1902; 6: 106-111.
  • 8
    Rollins W. Notes on X-Light. Cambridge, MA: University Press; 1904.
  • 9
    Scott SG. Notes on a case of x-ray dermatitis with fatal termination. Arch Roentgen Ray. 1911; 15: 443-444.
  • 10
    Von Jagic N, Schwartz G, Siebenrock L. Blutbefunde bei Rontgenologen. Berl Klin Wchnschr. 1911; 48: 1220.
  • 11
    Kathren RL. William H. Rollins (1852-1929): x-ray protection pioneer. J Hist Med Allied Sci. 1964; 19: 287-294.
  • 12
    Walker JS. The controversy over radiation safety. A historical overview. JAMA. 1989; 262: 664-668.
  • 13
    United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Vol I. New York: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation; 2000.
  • 14
    Simon SL, Weinstock RM, Doody MM, et al. Estimating historical radiation doses to a cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists. Radiat Res. 2006; 166( 1 pt 2): 174-192.
  • 15
    Stewart AM, Webb J, Giles D, Hewitt D. Malignant disease in childhood and diagnostic irradiation in utero. Lancet. 1956; ii: 447.
  • 16
    Stewart A, Webb J, Hewitt D. A survey of childhood malignancies. Br Med J. 1958; 1: 1495-1508.
  • 17
    MacMahon B. Prenatal x-ray exposure and childhood cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1962; 28: 1173-1191.
  • 18
    Wakeford R. Childhood leukaemia following medical diagnostic exposure to ionizing radiation in utero or after birth. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008; 132: 166-174.
  • 19
    Linet MS, Kim KP, Rajaraman P. Children's exposure to diagnostic medical radiation and cancer risk: epidemiologic and dosimetric considerations. Pediatr Radiol. 2009; 39( suppl 1): S4-S26.
  • 20
    Boice JD Jr, Preston D, Davis FG, Monson RR. Frequent chest X-ray fluoroscopy and breast cancer incidence among tuberculosis patients in Massachusetts. Radiat Res. 1991; 125: 214-222.
  • 21
    Howe GR, McLaughlin J. Breast cancer mortality between 1950 and 1987 after exposure to fractionated moderate-dose-rate ionizing radiation in the Canadian fluoroscopy cohort study and a comparison with breast cancer mortality in the atomic bomb survivors study. Radiat Res. 1996; 145: 694-707.
  • 22
    Ron E. Cancer risks from medical radiation. Health Phys. 2003; 85: 47-59.
  • 23
    Boice JD Jr. Ionizing radiation. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr, eds. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006: 259-293.
  • 24
    Doody MM, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, Hacker DG, Luckyanov N, Land CE. Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the U.S. Scoliosis Cohort Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25: 2052-2063.
  • 25
    National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States. NCRP Report No. 160. Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 2009.
  • 26
    Mettler FA Jr, Wiest PW, Locken JA, Kelsey CA. CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. J Radiol Prot. 2000; 20: 353-359.
  • 27
    United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Vol I. New York: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation; 1988.
  • 28
    National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. NCRP Report No. 93. Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation protection and Measurements, 1987.
  • 29
    Mettler FA Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources–1950-2007. Radiology. 2009; 253: 520-531.
  • 30
    International Commission on Radiation Protection. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Pub. No. 60. Ann ICRP. 1991; 60: 1-193.
  • 31
    International Commission on Radiation Protection. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Pub. No. 103. Ann ICRP. 2007; 37: 1-332.
  • 32
    IARC Working group on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: ionizing radiation, Part I, X- and gamma- radiation and neutrons. Lyon, France, 26 May-2 June 1999. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2000; 75( pt 1): 1-448.
  • 33
    IARC Working group on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: ionizing radiation, Part 2, some internally deposited radionuclides. Views and expert opinions of an IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Lyon, France, 14-21 June 2000. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2001; 78: 1-559.
  • 34
    United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Annex A Epidemiological Studies of Radiation Carcinogenesis. New York: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation; 1994: 11-183.
  • 35
    Hymes SR, Strom EA, Fife C. Radiation dermatitis: clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and treatment 2006. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006; 54: 28-46.
  • 36
    Balter S, Hopewell JW, Miller DL, Wagner LK, Zelefsky MJ. Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients' skin and hair. Radiology. 2010; 254: 326-341.
  • 37
    Ainsbury EA, Bouffler SD, Dorr W, et al. Radiation cataractogenesis: a review of recent studies. Radiat Res. 2009; 172: 1-9.
  • 38
    BEIR VII. Committee to Assess Health Risks From Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation. Health Risks From Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation. BEIR VII. Washington, DC: National Research Council; 2006.
  • 39
    United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Vol I. New York: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation; 2008.
  • 40
    Tubiana M. The report of the French Academy of Science: ‘Problems associated with the effects of low doses of ionising radiation’. J Radiol Prot. 1998; 18: 243-248.
  • 41
    Dauer LT, Brooks AL, Hoel DG, Morgan WF, Stram D, Tran P. Review and evaluation of updated research on the health effects associated with low-dose ionising radiation. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010; 140: 103-136.
  • 42
    Muirhead CR, O'Hagan JA, Haylock RG, et al. Mortality and cancer incidence following occupational radiation exposure: third analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers. Br J Cancer. 2009; 100: 206-212.
  • 43
    Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M, et al. The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: estimates of radiation-related cancer risks. Radiat Res. 2007; 167: 396-416.
  • 44
    Preston DL, Kusumi S, Tomonaga M, et al. Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part III. Leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma, 1950-1987. Radiat Res. 1994; 137( suppl 2): S68-S97.
  • 45
    Richardson D, Sugiyama H, Nishi N, et al. Ionizing radiation and leukemia mortality among Japanese Atomic Bomb Survivors, 1950-2000. Radiat Res. 2009; 172: 368-382.
  • 46
    Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S, et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998. Radiat Res. 2007; 168: 1-64.
  • 47
    Preston DL, Cullings H, Suyama A, et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors exposed in utero or as young children. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008; 100: 428-436.
  • 48
    Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M, et al. Risk of cancer after low doses of ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries. BMJ. 2005; 331: 77.
  • 49
    Kato H. Mortality in children exposed to the A-bombs while in utero, 1945-1969. Am J Epidemiol. 1971; 93: 435-442.
  • 50
    Brenner DJ, Hricak H. Radiation exposure from medical imaging: time to regulate? JAMA. 2010; 304: 208-209.
  • 51
    Levin DC, Rao VM, Parker L, Frangos AJ, Sunshine JH. Bending the curve: the recent marked slowdown in growth of noninvasive diagnostic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196: W25-W29.
  • 52
    Hart D, Hillier MC. Dose to Patients From Medical X-Ray Examinations in the UK-2000 Review. Chilton, UK: National Radiological Protection Board; 2007.
  • 53
    Hart D, Jones DG. Normalised Organ Doses for Medical X-Ray Examinations Calculated Using Monte Carlo Techniques. Chilton, UK: National Radiological Protection Board; 1994.
  • 54
    Spelic DC. Dose and Image Quality in Mammography: Trends During the First Decade of MQSA. Rockville, MD: US Food and Drug Administration; 2006.
  • 55
    Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors. Nationwide Evaluation of X-Ray Trends (NEXT): Tabulation and Graphical Summary of 2000 Survey of Computed Tomography. Frankfort, KY: Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, Inc.; 2007: 154.
  • 56
    Hart D, Hillier MC. Dose to Patients From Medical X-Ray Examinations in the UK-2002 Review. Chilton, UK: National Radiological Protection Board; 2002.
  • 57
    Onnasch DG, Schroder FK, Fischer G, Kramer HH. Diagnostic reference levels and effective dose in paediatric cardiac catheterization. Br J Radiol. 2007; 80: 177-185.
  • 58
    Galanski M, Nagel HD, Stamm G. Paediatric CT Exposure Practice in the Federal Republic of Germany–Results of a Nation-Wide Survey in 2005/2006. Hannover, Germany: Hannover Medical School; 2006. Available at http://ikrweb.uni-muenster.de. Accessed December 17, 2011.
  • 59
    Brix G, Nagel HD, Stamm G, et al. Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13: 1979-1991.
  • 60
    Matthews JC, Miller H. Radiation hazards from diagnostic radiology. A repeat survey over a small area. Br J Radiol. 1969; 42: 814-817.
  • 61
    Mole RH. Childhood cancer after prenatal exposure to diagnostic X-ray examinations in Britain. Br J Cancer. 1990; 62: 152-168.
  • 62
    Osei EK, Faulkner K. Fetal doses from radiological examinations. Br J Radiol. 1999; 72: 773-780.
  • 63
    Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169: 2078-2086.
  • 64
    Totter JR, MacPherson HG. Do childhood cancers result from prenatal x-rays? Health Phys. 1981; 40: 511-524.
  • 65
    Shu XO, Potter JD, Linet MS, et al. Diagnostic X-rays and ultrasound exposure and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia by immunophenotype. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002; 11: 177-185.
  • 66
    Bithell JF, Stewart AM. Pre-natal irradiation and childhood malignancy: a review of British data from the Oxford Survey. Br J Cancer. 1975; 31: 271-287.
  • 67
    Knox EG, Stewart AM, Kneale GW, Gilman EA. Prenatal irradiation and childhood cancer. J Soc Radiol Prot. 1987; 7: 177-189.
  • 68
    Doll R, Wakeford R. Risk of childhood cancer from fetal irradiation. Br J Radiol. 1997; 70: 130-139.
  • 69
    Mole RH. Antenatal irradiation and childhood cancer: causation or coincidence? Br J Cancer. 1974; 30: 199-208.
  • 70
    Harvey EB, Boice JD Jr, Honeyman M, Flannery JT. Prenatal x-ray exposure and childhood cancer in twins. N Engl J Med. 1985; 312: 541-545.
  • 71
    Rodvall Y, Pershagen G, Hrubec Z, Ahlbom A, Pedersen NL, Boice JD. Prenatal X-ray exposure and childhood cancer in Swedish twins. Int J Cancer. 1990; 46: 362-365.
  • 72
    Preston-Martin S, Yu MC, Benton B, Henderson BE. N-Nitroso compounds and childhood brain tumors: a case-control study. Cancer Res. 1982; 42: 5240-5245.
  • 73
    Bunin GR, Buckley JD, Boesel CP, Rorke LB, Meadows AT. Risk factors for astrocytic glioma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the brain in young children: a report from the Children's Cancer Group. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1994; 3: 197-204.
  • 74
    Schuz J, Kaletsch U, Kaatsch P, Meinert R, Michaelis J. Risk factors for pediatric tumors of the central nervous system: results from a German population-based case-control study. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2001; 36: 274-282.
  • 75
    van Steensel-Moll HA, Valkenburg HA, van Zanen GE. Childhood leukemia and parental occupation. A register-based case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 1985; 121: 216-224.
  • 76
    Shu XO, Gao YT, Brinton LA, et al. A population-based case-control study of childhood leukemia in Shanghai. Cancer. 1988; 62: 635-644.
  • 77
    Magnani C, Pastore G, Luzzatto L, Terracini B. Parental occupation and other environmental factors in the etiology of leukemias and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas in childhood: a case-control study. Tumori. 1990; 76: 413-419.
  • 78
    Naumburg E, Bellocco R, Cnattingius S, Hall P, Boice JD Jr, Ekbom A. Intrauterine exposure to diagnostic X rays and risk of childhood leukemia subtypes. Radiat Res. 2001; 156: 718-723.
  • 79
    Rajaraman P, Simpson J, Neta G, et al. Early life exposure to diagnostic radiation and ultrasound scans and risk of childhood cancer: case-control study. BMJ. 2011; 342: d472.
  • 80
    International Commission on Radiation Protection. Biological effects after prenatal irradiation (embryo and fetus). ICRP Pub. No. 90. Ann ICRP. 2003: 167-170.
  • 81
    Ray JG, Schull MJ, Urquia ML, You JJ, Guttmann A, Vermeulen MJ. Major radiodiagnostic imaging in pregnancy and the risk of childhood malignancy: a population-based cohort study in Ontario. PLoS Med. 2010; 7: e1000337.
  • 82
    Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation. The Effects on Populations of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: 1980. Washington, DC: National Research Council; 1980.
  • 83
    Hewitt D, Lashof JC, Stewart AM. Childhood cancer in twins. Cancer. 1966; 19: 157-161.
  • 84
    Norris FD, Jackson EW. Childhood cancer deaths in California-born twins. A further report on types of cancer found. Cancer. 1970; 25: 212-218.
  • 85
    Inskip PD, Harvey EB, Boice JD Jr, et al. Incidence of childhood cancer in twins. Cancer Causes Control. 1991; 2: 315-324.
  • 86
    Rodvall Y, Hrubec Z, Pershagen G, Ahlbom A, Bjurman A, Boice JD Jr. Childhood cancer among Swedish twins. Cancer Causes Control. 1992; 3: 527-532.
  • 87
    Murphy MF, Whiteman D, Hey K, et al. Childhood cancer incidence in a cohort of twin babies. Br J Cancer. 2001; 84: 1460-1462.
  • 88
    Neale RE, Mineau G, Whiteman DC, Brownbill PA, Murphy MF. Childhood and adult cancer in twins: evidence from the Utah genealogy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005; 14: 1236-1240.
  • 89
    Murphy MF, Bunch KJ, Chen B, Hemminki K. Reduced occurrence of childhood cancer in twins compared to singletons: protection but by what mechanism? Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008; 51: 62-65.
  • 90
    Puumala SE, Carozza SE, Chow EJ, et al. Childhood cancer among twins and higher order multiples. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009; 18: 162-168.
  • 91
    Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100: 13761-13766.
  • 92
    Lazarus E, Debenedectis C, North D, Spencer PK, Mayo-Smith WW. Utilization of imaging in pregnant patients: 10-year review of 5270 examinations in 3285 patients–1997-2006. Radiology. 2009; 251: 517-524.
  • 93
    Hartley AL, Birch JM, McKinney PA, et al. The Inter-Regional Epidemiological Study of Childhood Cancer (IRESCC): past medical history in children with cancer. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1988; 42: 235-242.
  • 94
    Spengler RF, Cook DH, Clarke EA, Olley PM, Newman AM. Cancer mortality following cardiac catheterization: a preliminary follow-up study on 4,891 irradiated children. Pediatrics. 1983; 71: 235-239.
  • 95
    Modan B, Keinan L, Blumstein T, Sadetzki S. Cancer following cardiac catheterization in childhood. Int J Epidemiol. 2000; 29: 424-428.
  • 96
    Infante-Rivard C. Diagnostic x rays, DNA repair genes and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Health Phys. 2003; 85: 60-64.
  • 97
    Polhemus DW, Koch R. Leukemia and medical radiation. Pediatrics. 1959; 23: 453-461.
  • 98
    Bartley K, Metayer C, Selvin S, Ducore J, Buffler P. Diagnostic X-rays and risk of childhood leukaemia. Int J Epidemiol. 2010; 39: 1628-1637.
  • 99
    Little J. Epidemiology of Childhood Cancer. IARC Scientific Pub. No. 149. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1999.
  • 100
    Shu XO, Jin F, Linet MS, et al. Diagnostic X-ray and ultrasound exposure and risk of childhood cancer. Br J Cancer. 1994; 70: 531-536.
  • 101
    Friedman DL, Whitton J, Leisenring W, et al. Subsequent neoplasms in 5-year survivors of childhood cancer: the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010; 102: 1083-1095.
  • 102
    Ronckers CM, Doody MM, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, Land CE. Multiple diagnostic X-rays for spine deformities and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008; 17: 605-613.
  • 103
    Davis FG, Boice JD Jr, Hrubec Z, Monson RR. Cancer mortality in a radiation-exposed cohort of Massachusetts tuberculosis patients. Cancer Res. 1989; 49: 6130-6136.
  • 104
    Ronckers CM, Land CE, Miller JS, Stovall M, Lonstein JE, Doody MM. Cancer mortality among women frequently exposed to radiographic examinations for spinal disorders. Radiat Res. 2010; 174: 83-90.
  • 105
    Schulze-Rath R, Hammer GP, Blettner M. Are pre- or postnatal diagnostic X-rays a risk factor for childhood cancer? A systematic review. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2008; 47: 301-312.
  • 106
    National Cancer Institute. Radiation Epidemiology Branch. Pediatric CT Scans. Cancer Incidence Among Children Undergoing Computed Tomography (CT) Scans. Available at: http://dceg.cancer.gov/reb/research/ionizing/medical/4. Accessed April 19, 2011.
  • 107
    Preston-Martin S, Pogoda JM. Estimation of radiographic doses in a case-control study of acute myelogenous leukemia. Health Phys. 2003; 84: 245-259.
  • 108
    Preston-Martin S, Thomas DC, Yu MC, Henderson BE. Diagnostic radiography as a risk factor for chronic myeloid and monocytic leukaemia (CML). Br J Cancer. 1989; 59: 639-644.
  • 109
    Boice JD Jr, Morin MM, Glass AG, et al. Diagnostic x-ray procedures and risk of leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. JAMA. 1991; 265: 1290-1294.
  • 110
    Inskip PD, Ekbom A, Galanti MR, Grimelius L, Boice JD Jr. Medical diagnostic x rays and thyroid cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995; 87: 1613-1621.
  • 111
    Preston-Martin S, Paganini-Hill A, Henderson BE, Pike MC, Wood C. Case-control study of intracranial meningiomas in women in Los Angeles County, California. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1980; 65: 67-73.
  • 112
    Preston-Martin S, Yu MC, Henderson BE, Roberts C. Risk factors for meningiomas in men in Los Angeles County. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1983; 70: 863-866.
  • 113
    Preston-Martin S, Henderson BE, Bernstein L. Medical and dental x rays as risk factors for recently diagnosed tumors of the head. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1985; 69: 175-179.
  • 114
    Preston-Martin S, Bernstein L, Maldonado AA, Henderson BE, White SC. A dental x-ray validation study. Comparison of information from patient interviews and dental charts. Am J Epidemiol. 1985; 121: 430-439.
  • 115
    Sigurdson AJ, Bhatti P, Preston DL, et al. Routine diagnostic X-ray examinations and increased frequency of chromosome translocations among U.S. radiologic technologists. Cancer Res. 2008; 68: 8825-8831.
  • 116
    Bhatti P, Doody MM, Rajaraman P, et al. Novel breast cancer risk alleles and interaction with ionizing radiation among U.S. radiologic technologists. Radiat Res. 2010; 173: 214-224.
  • 117
    Di Majo V, Coppola M, Rebessi S, Covelli V. Age-related susceptibility of mouse liver to induction of tumors by neutrons. Radiat Res. 1990; 124: 227-234.
  • 118
    Sasaki S. Influence of the age of mice at exposure to radiation on life-shortening and carcinogenesis. J Radiat Res (Tokyo). 1991; 32( suppl 2): 73-85.
  • 119
    Nitta Y, Kamiya K, Yokoro K. Carcinogenic effect of in utero 252Cf and 60Co irradiation in C57BL/6N x C3H/He F1 (B6C3F1) mice. J Radiat Res (Tokyo). 1992; 33: 319-333.
  • 120
    Rugh R, Duhamel L, Skaredoff L. Relation of embryonic and fetal x-irradiation to life time average weights and tumor incidence in mice. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1966; 121: 714-718.
  • 121
    Benjamin SA, Lee AC, Angleton GM, Saunders WJ, Keefe TJ, Mallinckrodt CH. Mortality in beagles irradiated during prenatal and postnatal development. II. Contribution of benign and malignant neoplasia. Radiat Res. 1998; 150: 330-348.
  • 122
    Uma Devi P. Radiosensitivity of the developing haemopoietic system in mammals and its adult consequences: animal studies. Br J Radiol. 2003; 76: 366-372.
  • 123
    Uma Devi P, Hossain M, Satyamitra M. Low Dose Fetal Irradiation, Chromosomal Instability and Carcinogenesis in the Mouse. Radiation and Homeostatis, International Congress Series No. 1236. 2002: 123-126.
  • 124
    Nakano M, Kodama Y, Ohtaki K, et al. Chromosome aberrations do not persist in the lymphocytes or bone marrow cells of mice irradiated in utero or soon after birth. Radiat Res. 2007; 167: 693-702.
  • 125
    Ohtaki K, Kodama Y, Nakano M, et al. Human fetuses do not register chromosome damage inflicted by radiation exposure in lymphoid precursor cells except for a small but significant effect at low doses. Radiat Res. 2004; 161: 373-379.
  • 126
    Berrington de Gonzalez A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet. 2004; 363: 345-351.
  • 127
    Berrington de Gonzalez A, Kim KP, Yee J. CT colonography: perforation rates and potential radiation risks. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010; 20: 279-291.
  • 128
    Berrington de Gonzalez A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169: 2071-2077.
  • 129
    American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2010. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2010.
  • 130
    Brenner DJ. Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. Radiology. 2004; 231: 440-445.
  • 131
    Kim KP, Einstein AJ, Berrington de Gonzalez A. Coronary artery calcification screening: estimated radiation dose and cancer risk. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169: 1188-1194.
  • 132
    Berrington de Gonzalez A, Kim KP, Knudsen AB, et al. Radiation-related cancer risks from CT colonography screening: a risk-benefit analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196: 816-823.
  • 133
    Brenner DJ, Elliston CD. Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. Radiology. 2004; 232: 735-738.
  • 134
    Yaffe MJ, Mainprize JG. Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening. Radiology. 2011; 258: 98-105.
  • 135
    Berrington de Gonzalez A, Reeves G. Mammographic screening before age 50 years in the UK: comparison of the radiation risks with the mortality benefits. Br J Cancer. 2005; 93: 590-596.
  • 136
    Concannon P, Gatti R. Nijmegen breakage syndrome. In: Pagon RA, Bird TD, Dolan CR, Stephens K, eds. Gene Reviews [internet]. 2010/03/20 ed. Seattle, WA: University of Washington at Seattle; 1993.
  • 137
    Gatti R. Candidates for the molecular defect in ataxia telangiectasia. Adv Neurol. 1993; 61: 127-132.
  • 138
    International Commission on Radiological Protection. Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer. ICRP Pub. No. 79. Ann ICRP. 1998; 28: 1-157.
  • 139
    Taylor AM, Harnden DG, Arlett CF, et al. Ataxia telangiectasia: a human mutation with abnormal radiation sensitivity. Nature. 1975; 258: 427-429.
  • 140
    Bakhshi S, Cerosaletti KM, Concannon P, et al. Medulloblastoma with adverse reaction to radiation therapy in nijmegen breakage syndrome. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003; 25: 248-251.
  • 141
    Pollard JM, Gatti RA. Clinical radiation sensitivity with DNA repair disorders: an overview. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 74: 1323-1331.
  • 142
    Allan JM. Genetic susceptibility to radiogenic cancer in humans. Health Phys. 2008; 95: 677-686.
  • 143
    Alter BP. Radiosensitivity in Fanconi's anemia patients. Radiother Oncol. 2002; 62: 345-347.
  • 144
    Kleinerman RA. Radiation-sensitive genetically susceptible pediatric sub-populations. Pediatr Radiol. 2009; 39( suppl 1): S27-S31.
  • 145
    Wong FL, Boice JD Jr, Abramson DH, et al. Cancer incidence after retinoblastoma. Radiation dose and sarcoma risk. JAMA. 1997; 278: 1262-1267.
  • 146
    Evans DG, Baser ME, McGaughran J, Sharif S, Howard E, Moran A. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis 1. J Med Genet. 2002; 39: 311-314.
  • 147
    Hisada M, Garber JE, Fung CY, Fraumeni JF Jr, Li FP. Multiple primary cancers in families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998; 90: 606-611.
  • 148
    Strong LC. Genetic and environmental interactions. Cancer. 1977; 40: 1861-1866.
  • 149
    de Graaf P, Goricke S, Rodjan F, et al. Guidelines for imaging retinoblastoma: imaging principles and MRI standardization [published online ahead of print August 18, 2011]. Pediatr Radiol.
  • 150
    Stavrou T, Bromley CM, Nicholson HS, et al. Prognostic factors and secondary malignancies in childhood medulloblastoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2001; 23: 431-436.
  • 151
    Masciari S, Van den Abbeele AD, Diller LR, et al. F18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography screening in Li-Fraumeni syndrome. JAMA. 2008; 299: 1315-1319.
  • 152
    Ferner RE, Lucas JD, O'Doherty MJ, et al. Evaluation of (18)fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)FDG PET) in the detection of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours arising from within plexiform neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis 1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000; 68: 353-357.
  • 153
    Infante-Rivard C, Mathonnet G, Sinnett D. Risk of childhood leukemia associated with diagnostic irradiation and polymorphisms in DNA repair genes. Environ Health Perspect. 2000; 108: 495-498.
  • 154
    Millikan RC, Player JS, Decotret AR, Tse CK, Keku T. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes, medical exposure to ionizing radiation, and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005; 14: 2326-2334.
  • 155
    Bhatti P, Struewing JP, Alexander BH, et al. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes, ionizing radiation exposure and risk of breast cancer in U.S. radiologic technologists. Int J Cancer. 2008; 122: 177-182.
  • 156
    Rajaraman P, Bhatti P, Doody MM, et al. Nucleotide excision repair polymorphisms may modify ionizing radiation-related breast cancer risk in US radiologic technologists. Int J Cancer. 2008; 123: 2713-2716.
  • 157
    Sigurdson AJ, Bhatti P, Doody MM, et al. Polymorphisms in apoptosis- and proliferation-related genes, ionizing radiation exposure, and risk of breast cancer among U.S. radiologic technologists. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007; 16: 2000-2007.
  • 158
    Liu Y, Scheurer ME, El-Zein R, et al. Association and interactions between DNA repair gene polymorphisms and adult glioma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009; 18: 204-214.
  • 159
    Barnett GC, West CM, Dunning AM, et al. Normal tissue reactions to radiotherapy: towards tailoring treatment dose by genotype. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009; 9: 134-142.
  • 160
    Krestinina LY, Preston DL, Ostroumova EV, et al. Protracted radiation exposure and cancer mortality in the Techa River Cohort. Radiat Res. 2005; 164: 602-611.
  • 161
    Krestinina LY, Davis F, Ostroumova E, et al. Solid cancer incidence and low-dose-rate radiation exposures in the Techa River cohort: 1956-2002. Int J Epidemiol. 2007; 36: 1038-1046.
  • 162
    Ostroumova E, Preston DL, Ron E, et al. Breast cancer incidence following low-dose rate environmental exposure: Techa River Cohort, 1956-2004. Br J Cancer. 2008; 99: 1940-1945.
  • 163
    Peloquin JM, Pardi DS, Sandborn WJ, et al. Diagnostic ionizing radiation exposure in a population-based cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 103: 2015-2022.
    Direct Link:
  • 164
    Palmer L, Herfarth H, Porter CQ, Fordham LA, Sandler RS, Kappelman MD. Diagnostic ionizing radiation exposure in a population-based sample of children with inflammatory bowel diseases. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104: 2816-2823.
  • 165
    Loftus ML, Minkowitz S, Tsiouris AJ, Min RJ, Sanelli PC. Utilization guidelines for reducing radiation exposure in the evaluation of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a practice quality improvement project. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195: 176-180.
  • 166
    Eisenberg MJ, Afilalo J, Lawler PR, Abrahamowicz M, Richard H, Pilote L. Cancer risk related to low-dose ionizing radiation from cardiac imaging in patients after acute myocardial infarction. CMAJ. 2011; 183: 430-436.
  • 167
    Bogdanich W, Craven McGinty J. Medicare claims show overuse for CT scanning. New York Times. June 18, 2011: A1. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/18/health/18radiation.html. Accessed December 20, 2011.
  • 168
    Bogdanich W. After stroke scans, patients face serious health risks. New York Times. August 1, 2010: A1. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/01/health/01radiation.html. Accessed December 20, 2011.
  • 169
    US Food and Drug Administration. Safety Investigation of CT Brain Perfusion Scans: Update 11/9/2010. Available at: www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/safety/alertsandnotices/ucm185898.htm. Accessed December 20, 2011.
  • 170
    Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP. Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology. 2004; 231: 393-398.
  • 171
    Thomas KE, Parnell-Parmley JE, Haidar S, et al. Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians. Pediatr Radiol. 2006; 36: 823-832.
  • 172
    Krille L, Hammer GP, Merzenich H, Zeeb H. Systematic review on physician's knowledge about radiation doses and radiation risks of computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2010; 76: 36-41.
  • 173
    Holmberg O, Czarwinski R, Mettler F. The importance and unique aspects of radiation protection in medicine. Eur J Radiol. 2010; 76: 6-10.
  • 174
    Sistrom CL. The ACR appropriateness criteria: translation to practice and research. J Am Coll Radiol. 2005; 2: 61-67.
  • 175
    Schueler BA. Incorporating radiation dose assessments into the ACR appropriateness criteria. J Am Coll Radiol. 2008; 5: 775-776.
  • 176
    Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, et al; American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group; American College of Radiology; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; North American Society for Cardiac Imaging; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Interventional Radiology. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48: 1475-1497.
  • 177
    Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56: 1864-1894.
  • 178
    The Royal College of Radiologists. RCR Referral Guidelines. Available at: http://www.rcr.ac.uk/content.aspx?PageID=995. Accessed December 20, 2011.
  • 179
    Howell JM, Eddy OL, Lukens TW, Thiessen ME, Weingart SD, Decker WW; American College of Emergency Physicians. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 2010; 55: 71-116.
  • 180
    Raja AS, Wright C, Sodickson AD, et al. Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective. Radiology. 2010; 256: 460-465.
  • 181
    Klein MD. Clinical approach to a child with abdominal pain who might have appendicitis. Pediatr Radiol. 2007; 37: 11-14.
  • 182
    Lander A. The role of imaging in children with suspected appendicitis: the UK perspective. Pediatr Radiol. 2007; 37: 5-9.
  • 183
    Kuppermann N, Holmes JF, Dayan PS, et al; Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2009; 374: 1160-1170.
  • 184
    Voss SD, Reaman GH, Kaste SC, Slovis TL. The ALARA concept in pediatric oncology. Pediatr Radiol. 2009; 39: 1142-1146.
  • 185
    Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Chan BK, Humphrey L; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151: 727-737, W237-W242.
  • 186
    Bevers TB, Anderson BO, Bonaccio E, et al; Chan BK, Humphrey L; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer screening and diagnosis. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009; 7: 1060-1096.
  • 187
    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151: 716-726, W-236.
  • 188
    Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brooks D, Saslow D, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010; 60: 99-119.
  • 189
    Mandelblatt JS, Cronin KA, Bailey S, et al; Breast Cancer Working Group of the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network. Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151: 738-747.
  • 190
    Thierry-Chef I, Simon SL, Weinstock RM, Kwon D, Linet MS. Reconstruction of absorbed doses to fibroglandular tissue of the breast of women undergoing mammography (1960 to the present) [published online ahead of print October 12, 2011]. Radiat Res.
  • 191
    Berrington de Gonzalez A, Berg CD, Visvanathan K, Robson M. Estimated risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening for young BRCA mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009; 101: 205-209.
  • 192
    McCollough CH, Primak AN, Braun N, Kofler J, Yu L, Christner J. Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009; 47: 27-40.
  • 193
    Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, Kujak JL, Lawder HJ, Pavlicek W. Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193: 764-771.
  • 194
    Fink C, Krissak R, Henzler T, et al. Radiation dose at coronary CT angiography: second-generation dual-source CT versus single-source 64-MDCT and first-generation dual-source CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196: W550-W557.
  • 195
    Neefjes LA, Dharampal AS, Rossi A, et al. Image quality and radiation exposure using different low-dose scan protocols in dual-source CT coronary angiography: randomized study. Radiology. 2011; 261: 779-786.
  • 196
    Strauss KJ, Goske MJ. Estimated pediatric radiation dose during CT. Pediatr Radiol. 2011; 41( suppl 2): 472-482.
  • 197
    Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM, Share DA, et al; Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium Co-Investigators. Radiation dose from cardiac computed tomography before and after implementation of radiation dose-reduction techniques. JAMA. 2009; 301: 2340-2348.
  • 198
    International Commission on Radiation Protection. Radiological Protection and Safety in Medicine. ICRP Pub. No. 73. Ann ICRP. 1996; 26:1-47.
  • 199
    Wall BF, Shrimpton PC. The historical development of reference doses in diagnostic radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 1998; 80: 15-20.
  • 200
    American College of Radiology. ACR Practice Guideline for Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical X-Ray Imaging. Available at: http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMain MenuCategories/quality_safety/guidelines/med_phys/reference_levels.aspx. Accessed December 20, 2011.
  • 201
    Wennberg J, Gittelsohn A. Small area variations in health care delivery. Science. 1973; 182: 1102-1108.
  • 202
    Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health. 1984; 74: 979-983.
  • 203
    Kahn KL, Kosecoff J, Chassin MR, et al. Measuring the clinical appropriateness of the use of a procedure. Can we do it? Med Care. 1988; 26: 415-422.
  • 204
    Ayanian JZ, Landrum MB, Normand SL, Guadagnoli E, McNeil BJ. Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography-do practicing physicians agree with an expert panel and with each other? N Engl J Med. 1998; 338: 1896-1904.
  • 205
    Junghans C, Feder G, Timmis AD, et al. Effect of patient-specific ratings vs conventional guidelines on investigation decisions in angina: Appropriateness of Referral and Investigation in Angina (ARIA) Trial. Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167: 195-202.
  • 206
    Cascade PN. The American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria project. Radiology. 2000; 214( suppl): 3-46.
  • 207
    Blackmore CC, Medina LS. Evidence-based radiology and the ACR Appropriateness Criteria. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006; 3: 505-509.
  • 208
    Bettmann MA. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria: view from the committee chair. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006; 3: 510-512.
  • 209
    Sistrom CL; American College of Radiology. In support of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria. J Am Coll Radiol. 2008; 5: 630-635; discussion 636-637.
  • 210
    Levy G, Blachar A, Goldstein L, et al. Nonradiologist utilization of American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria in a preauthorization center for MRI requests: applicability and effects. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187: 855-858.
  • 211
    Miller JA, Raichlin E, Williamson EE, et al. Evaluation of coronary CTA Appropriateness Criteria in an academic medical center. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010; 7: 125-131.
  • 212
    Bautista AB, Burgos A, Nickel BJ, Yoon JJ, Tilara AA, Amorosa JK; American College of Radiology Appropriateness. Do clinicians use the American College of Radiology Appropriateness criteria in the management of their patients? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 192: 1581-1585.
  • 213
    Sharma S, Riviello JJ, Harper MB, Baskin MN. The role of emergent neuroimaging in children with new-onset afebrile seizures. Pediatrics. 2003; 111: 1-5.
  • 214
    Heinz ER, Heinz TR, Radtke R, et al. Efficacy of MR vs CT in epilepsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989; 152: 347-352.
  • 215
    Bernal B, Altman NR. Evidence-based medicine: neuroimaging of seizures. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2003; 13: 211-224.
  • 216
    Lewis DW, Ashwal S, Dahl G, et al; Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Practice parameter: evaluation of children and adolescents with recurrent headaches: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology. 2002; 59: 490-498.
  • 217
    Korley FK, Pham JC, Kirsch TD. Use of advanced radiology during visits to US emergency departments for injury-related conditions, 1998-2007. JAMA. 2010; 304: 1465-1471.
  • 218
    Griffith B, Bolton C, Goyal N, Brown ML, Jain R. Screening cervical spine CT in a level I trauma center: overutilization? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 197: 463-467.
  • 219
    Lehnert BE, Bree RL. Analysis of appropriateness of outpatient CT and MRI referred from primary care clinics at an academic medical center: how critical is the need for improved decision support? J Am Coll Radiol. 2010; 7: 192-197.
  • 220
    Guimaraes LS, Fidler JL, Fletcher JG, et al. Assessment of appropriateness of indications for CT enterography in younger patients. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010; 16: 226-232.
  • 221
    Blachar A, Tal S, Mandel A, et al. Preauthorization of CT and MRI examinations: assessment of a managed care preauthorization program based on the ACR Appropriateness Criteria and the Royal College of Radiology guidelines. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006; 3: 851-859.
  • 222
    Sistrom CL, Dang PA, Weilburg JB, Dreyer KJ, Rosenthal DI, Thrall JH. Effect of computerized order entry with integrated decision support on the growth of outpatient procedure volumes: seven-year time series analysis. Radiology. 2009; 251: 147-155.
  • 223
    Vartanians VM, Sistrom CL, Weilburg JB, Rosenthal DI, Thrall JH. Increasing the appropriateness of outpatient imaging: effects of a barrier to ordering low-yield examinations. Radiology. 2010; 255: 842-849.
  • 224
    Slovis TL, Berdon WE. The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction. Pediatr Radiol. 2001; 32: 217-317.
  • 225
    Strauss KJ, Kaste SC. The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric interventional and fluoroscopic imaging: striving to keep radiation doses as low as possible during fluoroscopy of pediatric patients-a white paper executive summary. Pediatr Radiol. 2006; 36( suppl 2): 110-112.
  • 226
    Frush DP, Frush KS. The ALARA concept in pediatric imaging: building bridges between radiology and emergency medicine: consensus conference on imaging safety and quality for children in the emergency setting, Feb. 23-24, 2008, Orlando, FL-Executive Summary. Pediatr Radiol. 2008; 38( suppl 4): S629-S632.
  • 227
    Kaste SC. The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric imaging: oncology. Pediatr Radiol. 2009; 39( suppl 1): S1-S81.
  • 228
    Goske M, Applegate K, Bulas D, et al. Image Gently: progress and challenges in CT education and advocacy. Pediatr Radiol. 2011; 41: 461-466.
  • 229
    The Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging. Image Gently. Available at: http://www.pedrad.org/associations/5364/ig/. Accessed December 20, 2011.
  • 230
    Levin DC, Rao VM. The effect of self-referral on utilization of advanced diagnostic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196: 848-852.
  • 231
    Studdert DM, Mello MM, Sage WM, et al. Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA. 2005; 293: 2609-2617.
  • 232
    Massachusetts Medical Society. Investigation of Defensive Medicine in Massachusetts, November 2008. Available at: http://www.massmed.org/AM/Template. cfm?Section=Search8&CONTENTID=27797 &TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm. Accessed December 20, 2011
  • 233
    The Commonwealth Fund Commission on a High Performance Health System. Why Not the Best? Results from a National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 2006. Available at: http://www.common wealthfund.org/usr_doc/Commission_why notthebest_951.pdf. Accessed December 20, 2011.
  • 234
    Hendee WR, Becker GJ, Borgstede JP, et al. Addressing overutilization in medical imaging. Radiology. 2010; 257: 240-245.
  • 235
    Dauer LT, Thornton RH, Hay JL, Balter R, Williamson MJ, St Germain J. Fears, feelings, and facts: interactively communicating benefits and risks of medical radiation with patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196: 756-761.
  • 236
    Chun-Sing W, Bingsheng H, Ho-Kwan S, Wai-Lam W, Ka-Ling Y, Tiffany CY. A questionnaire study assessing local physicians, radiologists and interns' knowledge and practice pertaining to radiation exposure related to radiological imaging [published online ahead of print March 23, 2011]. Eur J Radiol.