DISCLOSURES: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Electronic patient-reported outcome systems in oncology clinical practice†
Article first published online: 18 JUL 2012
Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society, Inc.
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Volume 62, Issue 5, pages 336–347, September/October 2012
How to Cite
Bennett, A. V., Jensen, R. E. and Basch, E. (2012), Electronic patient-reported outcome systems in oncology clinical practice. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 62: 336–347. doi: 10.3322/caac.21150
- Issue published online: 17 SEP 2012
- Article first published online: 18 JUL 2012
- 1US Food and Drug Administration. Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. Fed Regist. 2009; 74( 235).
- 2Guidelines in Scale Development. In: Scale Development: Theory and Applications.Applied Research Methods Series. Vol 26. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2003: 60-101..
- 3Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2000..
- 4The use of cognitive interviewing techniques in quality-of-life and patient-reported outcomes assessment. In: Lipscomb J, Gotay C, Synder C, eds. Outcomes Assessment in Cancer: Measures, Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004: 610-622., , .
- 5Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1-eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health. 2011; 14: 967-977., , , et al.
- 6Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 2-assessing respondent understanding. Value Health. 2011; 14: 978-988., , , et al.
- 7ISPOR ePRO Task Force. Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report. Value Health. 2009; 12: 419-429., , , et al;
- 12International Society for Quality of Life Research. User's Guide to Implementing Patient Reported Outcomes Assessment in Clinical Practice, prepared by , , , et al. Version from November 11, 2011. isoqol.org/User's%20Guide-v6-final%20for%20posting-110707.pdf.
- 13Evaluating the impact of method of administration on item response: results from the PROMIS initiative. Qual Life Res. 2012; 20( suppl): 47., , , .
- 20Perceptions of the use of a remote monitoring system in patients receiving palliative care at home. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2008; 14: 426-431., , , et al.
- 27Reliability of adverse symptom event reporting by clinicians. Qual Life Res. 2011; doi:10.1007/s11136-011-0031-4., , , et al.
- 28Institute of Medicine. The Learning Healthcare System: Workshop Summary (IOM Roundtable on Evidence-based Medicine). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007.
- 30Management of gastrointestinal symptoms in advanced cancer patients: the rapid learning cancer clinic model. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2010; 4: 36-45., , .
- 33Validation study of a web-based assessment of functional recovery after radical prostatectomy. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010; 8: 82., , , , , .
- 34Prediction models in cancer care. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011; 61: 315-326..
- 36American Society for Clinical Oncology. The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI). qopi.asco.org/program. Accessed March 10, 2012.
- 37American Medical Association. The Performance Consortium for Performance Improvement (PCPI). ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/physician-consortium-performance-improvement.page? Accessed March 12, 2012.