The American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association make every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of an outside relationship or a personal, professional, or business interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing group are required to complete and submit a Disclosure Questionnaire showing all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest.
Evolution of “The Guideline Advantage”: Lessons learned from the front lines of outpatient performance measurement
Version of Record online: 30 APR 2014
© 2014 by the American Cancer Society, American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association, Inc.
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Volume 64, Issue 3, pages 157–163, May/June 2014
How to Cite
Bufalino, V., Bauman, M. A., Shubrook, J. H., Balch, A. J., Boone, C., Vennum, K., Bradley, S., Wender, R. C., Minners, R., Arnett, D. and on behalf of the American Cancer Society, American Diabetes Association, and American Heart Association (2014), Evolution of “The Guideline Advantage”: Lessons learned from the front lines of outpatient performance measurement. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 64: 157–163. doi: 10.3322/caac.21233
This document was approved by the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee.
This article has been copublished in Circulation Outcomes and Diabetes Care.
- Issue online: 27 MAY 2014
- Version of Record online: 30 APR 2014
- Manuscript Received: 9 APR 2014
- Manuscript Accepted: 9 APR 2014
- 1Deaths: final data for 2010. National Vital Statistics Report. Vol 61, No 4. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2013., , .
- 4Cancer screening in the United States, 2013: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines, current issues in cancer screening, and new guidance on cervical cancer screening and lung cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:88-105., , , , .
- 5Overview of the American Heart Association “Get With the Guide-lines” programs: coronary heart disease, stroke, and heart failure. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2006;5:179-186., .
- 9Physician adoption of electronic health record systems: United States, 2011. NCHS Data Brief. 2012;(98):1-8., , , , , .
- 10Use of Electronic Health Record Systems in 2011 Among Medicare Physicians Providing Evaluation and Management Services. Report No. OEI-04-10-00184. Washington, DC: Office of Inspector General, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2012..
- 11Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States 2001–2012. NCHS Data Brief. 2012;111:1-8., .
- 12Associations between structural capabilities of primary care practices and performance on selected quality measures. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:456-463., , , , , .
- 13Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:897-903., .
- 18Private “Performance Feedback” Reporting for Physicians: Guidance for Community Quality Collaboratives. AHRQ Pub. No. 13–0004. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012., .