• 1
    Lopez A, Murray C. The Global Burden of Disease: a Comprehensive Assessment of Mortality and Ddisability from Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors in 1990 and Projected to 2020. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press; 1996.
  • 2
    Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55: 1030.
  • 3
    Jemal A, Clegg LX, Ward E, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2001, with a special feature regarding survival. Cancer 2004; 101: 327.
  • 4
    Dickey LL, Gemson DH, Carney P. Office system interventions supporting primary care-based health behavior change counseling. Am J Prev Med 1999; 17: 299308.
  • 5
    Edwards A, Unigwe S, Elwyn G, Hood K. Effects of communicating individual risks in screening programmes: Cochrane systematic review. BMJ 2003; 327: 703709.
  • 6
    Edwards A, Unigwe S, Elwyn G, Hood K. Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about entering screening programs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003: CD001865.
  • 7
    Glasgow RE, Marcus AC, Bull SS, Wilson KM. Disseminating effective cancer screening interventions. Cancer 2004; 101: 12391250.
  • 8
    Hulscher ME, Wensing M, van Der Weijden T, Grol R. Interventions to implement prevention in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001: CD000362.
  • 9
    Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003: CD000259.
  • 10
    O'Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003: CD001431.
  • 11
    Stone E, Morton S, Hulscher M, et al. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 641651.
  • 12
    Zapka J, Lemon S. Interventions for patients, providers, and healthcare organizations. Cancer 2004; 101: 11651187.
  • 13
    Schmittling G. Computer use by family physicians in the United States. J Fam Pract 1984; 19: 9397.
  • 14
    Schmittling GT. Computer use by family physicians in the United States. J Fam Pract 1989; 29: 198200.
  • 15
    Lacher D. Computer use and needs of internists: a survey of members of the American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine. Proc AMIA Symp 2000; 453456.
  • 16
    Gandhi TK, Sequist TD, Poon EG, et al. Primary care clinician attitudes towards electronic clinical reminders and clinical practice guidelines. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003: 848.
  • 17
    Sequist TD, Gandhi TK, Karson AS, et al. A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve quality of care for diabetes and coronary artery disease. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005; 12: 431437.
  • 18
    Whitlock E, Orleans T, Pender N, Allan J. Evaluating primary care behavioral counseling interventions: an evidence-based approach. Am J Prev Med 2002; 22: 267284.
  • 19
    Glasgow RE, Bull SS, Piette JD, Steiner JF. Interactive behavior change technology. A partial solution to the competing demands of primary care. Am J Prev Med 2004; 27: 8087.
  • 20
    Becker DM, Gomez EB, Kaiser DL, et al. Improving preventive care at a medical clinic: how can the patient help? Am J Prev Med 1989; 5: 353359.
  • 21
    Burack RC, Gimotty PA, George J, et al. Promoting screening mammography in inner-city settings: a randomized controlled trial of computerized reminders as a component of a program to facilitate mammography. Med Care 1994; 32: 609624.
  • 22
    Burack RC, Gimotty PA, George J, et al. The effect of patient and physician reminders on use of screening mammography in a health maintenance organization. Results of a randomized controlled trial. Cancer 1996; 78: 17081721.
  • 23
    Burack RC, Gimotty PA, George J, et al. How reminders given to patients and physicians affected pap smear use in a health maintenance organization: results of a randomized controlled trial. Cancer 1998; 82: 23912400.
  • 24
    Burack RC, Gimotty PA, Simon M, et al. The effect of adding Pap smear information to a mammography reminder system in an HMO: results of randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 2003; 36: 547554.
  • 25
    Campbell E, Peterkin D, Abbott R, Rogers J. Encouraging underscreened women to have cervical cancer screening: the effectiveness of a computer strategy. Prev Med 1997; 26: 801807.
  • 26
    Chambers CV, Balaban DJ, Carlson BL, et al. Microcomputer-generated reminders. Improving the compliance of primary care physicians with mammography screening guidelines. J Fam Pract 1989; 29: 273280.
  • 27
    Fordham D, McPhee SJ, Bird JA, et al. The cancer prevention reminder system. MD Comput 1990; 7: 289295.
  • 28
    Frame PS, Zimmer JG, Werth PL, et al. Computer-based vs manual health maintenance tracking. A controlled trial. Arch Fam Med 1994; 3: 581588.
  • 29
    Garr DR, Ornstein SM, Jenkins R, Zemp LD. The effect of routine use of computer-generated preventive reminders in a clinical practice. Am J Prev Med 1993; 9: 5561.
  • 30
    Goldberg HI, Neighbor WE, Cheadle AD, et al. A controlled time-series trial of clinical reminders: using computerized firm systems to make quality improvement research a routine part of mainstream practice. Health Serv Res 2000; 34: 15191534.
  • 31
    Goldberg D, Schiff GD, McNutt R, et al. Mailings timed to patients' appointments: a controlled trial of fecal occult blood test cards. Am J Prev Med 2004; 26: 431435.
  • 32
    Harris RP, O'Malley, MS, Fletcher SW, Knight BP. Prompting physicians for preventive procedures: a five-year study of manual and computer reminders. Am J Prev Med 1990; 6: 145152.
  • 33
    Landis SE, Hulkower SD, Pierson S. Enhancing adherence with mammography through patient letters and physician prompts. A pilot study. NC Med J 1992; 53: 575578.
  • 34
    Litzelman DK, Dittus RS, Miller ME, Tierney WM. Requiring physicians to respond to computerized reminders improves their compliance with preventive care protocols. J Gen Intern Med 1993; 8: 311317.
  • 35
    McDonald CJ, Hui SL, Smith DM, et al. Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 1984; 100: 130138.
  • 36
    McDowell I, Newell C, Rosser W. Computerized reminders to encourage cervical screening in family practice. J Fam Pract 1989; 28: 420424.
  • 37
    McPhee SJ, Bird JA, Jenkins CN, Fordham D. Promoting cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial of three interventions. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 18661872.
  • 38
    McPhee SJ, Bird JA, Fordham D, et al. Promoting cancer prevention activities by primary care physicians. Results of a randomized, controlled trial. JAMA 1991; 266: 538544.
  • 39
    Murphy DJ, Gross R, Buchanan J. Computerized reminders for five preventive screening tests: generation of patient-specific letters incorporating physician preferences. Proc AMIA Symp 2000: 600604.
  • 40
    Nease, Jr. DE, Green, LA. ClinfoTracker: a generalizable prompting tool for primary care. J Am Board Fam Pract 2003; 16: 115123.
  • 41
    Nguyen BH, Nguyen KP, McPhee SJ, et al. Promoting cancer prevention activities among Vietnamese physicians in California. J Cancer Educ 2000; 15: 8285.
  • 42
    Ornstein SM, Garr DR, Jenkins RG, et al. Computer-generated physician and patient reminders. Tools to improve population adherence to selected preventive services. J Fam Pract 1991; 32: 8290.
  • 43
    Tape TG, Campbell JR. Computerized medical records and preventive health care: success depends on many factors. Am J Med 1993; 94: 619625.
  • 44
    Tierney WM, Hui SL, McDonald CJ. Delayed feedback of physician performance versus immediate reminders to perform preventive care. Effects on physician compliance. Med Care 1986; 24: 659666.
  • 45
    Turner BJ, Day SC, Borenstein B. A controlled trial to improve delivery of preventive care: physician or patient reminders? J Gen Intern Med 1989; 4: 403409.
  • 46
    Turner RC, Peden Jr., JG, O'Brien K. Patient-carried card prompts vs computer-generated prompts to remind private practice physicians to perform health maintenance measures. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 19571960.
  • 47
    Weingarten MA, Bazel D, Shannon HS. Computerized protocol for preventive medicine: a controlled self-audit in family practice. Fam Pract 1989; 6: 120124.
  • 48
    Williams RB, Boles M, Johnson RE. A patient-initiated system for preventive health care. A randomized trial in community-based pri-mary care practices. Arch Fam Med 1998; 7: 338345.
  • 49
    Yarnall KS, Rimer BK, Hynes D, et al. Computerized prompts for cancer screening in a community health center. J Am Board Fam Pract 1998; 11: 96104.
  • 50
    Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005; 330: 765.
  • 51
    Biem HJ, Turnell RW, D'Arcy C. Computer telephony: automated calls for medical care. Clin Invest Med 2003; 26: 259268.
  • 52
    Bodenheimer T, Wagner E, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. JAMA 2002; 288: 19091914.
  • 53
    Coulson AS, Glasspool DW, Fox J, Emery J. RAGs: A novel approach to computerized genetic risk assessment and decision support from pedigrees. Methods Inf Med 2001; 40: 315322.
  • 54
    Leininger LS, Finn L, Dickey L, et al. An office system for organizing preventive services: a report by the American Cancer Society Advisory Group on Preventive Health Care Reminder Systems. Arch Fam Med 1996; 5: 108115.
  • 55
    Carney PA, Dietrich AJ, Keller A, et al. Tools, teamwork, and tenacity: an office system for cancer prevention. J Fam Pract 1992; 35: 388394.
  • 56
    Carpiano R, Flocke S, Frank S, Stange K. Tools, teamwork, and tenacity: an examination of family practice office system influences on preventive service delivery. Preventive Medicine 2003; 36: 131140.
  • 57
    Miller WL, Crabtree BF, McDaniel R, Stange KC. Understanding change in primary care practice using complexity theory. J Fam Pract 1998; 46: 369376.
  • 58
    Miller WL, McDaniel Jr., RR, Crabtree, BF, Stange KC. Practice jazz: understanding variation in family practices using complexity science. J Fam Pract 2001; 50: 872878.
  • 59
    Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005; 293: 12231238.
  • 60
    Rousseau N, McColl E, Newton J, et al. Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care. BMJ 2003; 326: 314.
  • 61
    Martin JC, Avant RF, Bowman MA, et al. The Future of Family Medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. Ann Fam Med 2004; 2: S3S32.
  • 62
    Neil N. Improving rates of screening and prevention by leveraging existing information systems. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 2003; 29: 610618.