• 1
    Sheridan SL, Harris RP, Woolf SH, and the Shared Decision-Making Workgroup of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. A suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med 2004; 26:5666.
  • 2
    Siminoff LA, Step MM. A communication model of shared decision making: accounting for cancer treatment decisions. Health Psychol 2005; 24(suppl):S99S105.
  • 3
    Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science 1987; 236:280285.
  • 4
    Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal 2004; 24:311322.
  • 5
    Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Facts and fears: understanding perceived risk, in SchwingR, AlbersWA (eds). Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough? New York, NY: Plenum; 1980:181214.
  • 6
    McCaul KD, Branstetter AD, Schroeder DM, Glasgow RE. What is the relationship between breast cancer risk and mammography screening? A meta-analytic review. Health Psychol 1996; 15:423429.
  • 7
    Weinstein ND, Rothman AJ, Nicolich M. Use of correlational data to examine the effects of risk perception on precautionary behaviors. Psychol Health 1998; 13:479501.
  • 8
    Brewer NT, Chapman GB, Gibbons FX, et al. A meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: the example of vaccination. Health Psychol. In press.
  • 9
    Gerrard M, Gibbons FX, Bushman BJ. Relation between perceived vulnerability to HIV and precautionary sexual behavior. Psychol Bull 1996; 119:390409.
  • 10
    Ford JS, Coups EJ, Hay JL. Knowledge of colon cancer screening in a national probability sample in the United States. J Health Commun 2006; 11(suppl):1935.
  • 11
    Han PK, Moser RP, Klein WM. Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: relationship to perceptions of cancer preventability, risk, and worry. J Health Commun 2006; 11(suppl):5169.
  • 12
    Taylor SE, Brown JD. Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychol Bull 1988; 103:193210.
  • 13
    Taylor SE, Kemeny ME, Aspinwall LG, et al. Optimism, coping, psychological distress, and high-risk sexual behavior among men at risk for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). J Pers Soc Psychol 1992; 63:460473.
  • 14
    Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ. Changing inaccurate perceptions of health risk: results from a randomized trial. Health Psychol 1995; 14:5663.
  • 15
    Radcliffe NM, Klein WMP. Dispositional, unrealistic, and comparative optimism: differential relations with knowledge and processing of risk information and beliefs about personal risk. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2002; 28:836846.
  • 16
    Klein WMP, Geaghan TR, MacDonald TK. Unplanned sexual activity as a consequence of alcohol use: a prospective study of risk perceptions and alcohol use among college freshmen. J Am College Health. In press.
  • 17
    Klein WMP, Cooper KL. On the physical health costs of self-enhancement, in ChangE (ed). Self-criticism and Self-enhancement: Theory, Research, and Clinical Implications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. In press.
  • 18
    Dillard AJ, McCaul KD, Klein WMP. Unrealistic optimism in smokers: implications for smoking myth endorsement and self-protective motivation. J Health Commun 2006; 11(suppl):93102.
  • 19
    Paulos JA. Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and Its Consequences. New York, NY: Hill and Wang; 1988.
  • 20
    Spencer SJ, Steele CM, Quinn DM. Stereotype threat and women's math performance. J Exp Soc Psych 1999; 35:428.
  • 21
    Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Moncur M, et al. Assessing values for health: numeracy matters. Med Decis Making 2001; 21:382390.
  • 22
    Lipkus IM, Samsa G, Rimer BK. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Med Decis Making 2001; 21:3744.
  • 23
    Wolf MS, Gazmararian JA, Baker DW. Health literacy and functional health status among older adults. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165:19461952.
  • 24
    Boland PJ, Nicholson J. The statistics and probability curriculum at the secondary school level in the USA, Ireland, and the UK. Statistician 1996; 45:437446.
  • 25
    Fischhoff B, Bruine de Bruin W. Fifty-fifty = 50%? J Behav Decis Making 1999; 12:149163.
  • 26
    Linville PW, Fischer GW, Fischhoff B. AIDS risk perceptions and decision biases, in PryorJB, ReederG (eds). The Social Psychology of HIV Infection. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1993:538.
  • 27
    Gurmankin AD, Helweg-Larsen M, Armstrong K, et al. Comparing the standard rating scale and the magnifier scale for assessing risk perceptions. Med Decis Making 2005; 25:560570.
  • 28
    Borland R. What do people's estimates of smoking related risk mean? Psychol Health 1997; 12:513521.
  • 29
    Villejoubert G, Mandel DR. The inverse fallacy: an account of deviations from Bayes's theorem and the additivity principle. Mem Cognit 2002; 30:171178.
  • 30
    Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 72:11171130.
  • 31
    Denes-Raj V, Epstein S. Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994; 66:819829.
  • 32
    Slovic P, Monahan J, MacGregor DG. Violence risk assessment and risk communication: the effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. Law Hum Behav 2000; 24:271296.
  • 33
    Gigerenzer G. How to make cognitive illusions disappear: beyond heuristics and biases, in StroebeW, HewstoneM (eds). European Review of Social Psychology. Vol 2. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 1991:83115.
  • 34
    Viscusi WK. Do smokers underestimate risks? J Political Econ 1990; 98:12531269.
  • 35
    Windchitl PD. Judging the accuracy of a likelihood judgment: the case of smoking risk. J Behav Decis Making 2002; 15:1935.
  • 36
    Chapman LJ, Chapman JP. Genesis of popular but erroneous psychodiagnostic observations. J Abnorm Psychol 1967; 72:193204.
  • 37
    Nisbett R, Ross L. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1980:4362.
  • 38
    Thun MJ, Myers DG, Day-Lally C, et al. Age and the exposure-response relationships between cigarette smoking and premature death in Cancer Prevention Study II, in National Cancer Institute. Smoking and Tobacco Control, Monograph 8: Changes in Cigarette-Related Disease Risks and Their Implication for Prevention and Control. NIH Publication No.97-4312. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health; 1997:383475.
  • 39
    Slovic P. What does it mean to know a cumulative risk? Adolescents' perceptions of short-term and long-term consequences of smoking. J Behav Decis Making 2000; 13:259266.
  • 40
    Weinstein ND, McCaul KD, Gerrard M, Gibbons FX. Risk perceptions: assessment and relationship to influenza vaccination. Health Psychol. In press.
  • 41
    Windschitl PD, Wells GL. Measuring psychological uncertainty: verbal vs numeric methods. J Exp Psychol Appl 1996; 2:343364.
  • 42
    European Commission. A guideline on the readability of the label and package leaflet of medicinal products for human use. Brussels, Belgium: Pharmaceutical Committee, European Commission; 1998.
  • 43
    Berry DC, Raynor DK, Knapp P, Bersellini E. Patients' understanding of risk associated with medication use: impact of European Commission guidelines and other risk scales. Drug Saf 2003; 26:111.
  • 44
    Hughes C, Lerman C, Lustbader E. Ethnic differences in risk perception among women at increased risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1996; 40:2535.
  • 45
    Finucane ML. Mad cows, mad corn and mad communities: the role of socio-cultural factors in the perceived risk of genetically-modified food. Proc Nutr Soc 2002; 61:3137.
  • 46
    Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974; 185:11241131.
  • 47
    Schwartz S. Heuristics and biases in medical judgment and decision making, in HeathL, TinsdaleRS, EdwardsJ, et al. (eds). Applications of Heuristics and Biases to Social Issues. New York, NY: Plenum; 1994:4572.
  • 48
    Dawson NV, Arkes HR. Systematic errors in medical decision-making: judgment limitations. J Gen Intern Med 1987; 2:183187.
  • 49
    Suls J, Wan CK, Sanders GS. False consensus and false uniqueness in estimating the prevalence of health-protective behaviors. J App Soc Psychol 1988; 18:6679.
  • 50
    Rothman AJ, Schwarz N. Constructing perceptions of vulnerability: personal relevance and the use of experiential information in health judgments. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1998; 24:10531064.
  • 51
    Freymuth AK, Ronan GF. Modeling patient decision-making: the role of base-rate and anecdotal information. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2004; 11:211216.
  • 52
    Epley N, Gilovich T. Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychol Sci 2001; 12:391396.
    Direct Link:
  • 53
    Chapman GB, Johnson EJ. Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1999; 79:115153.
  • 54
    Klayman J, Ha YW. Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychol Rev 1987; 94:211228.
  • 55
    Anderson CA, Lepper MR, Ross L. Perseverance of social theories. The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. J Pers Soc Psychol 1980; 39:10371049.
  • 56
    Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion, in BerkowitzL (ed). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1986:123205.
  • 57
    Lieberman A, Chaiken S. Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1992; 18:669679.
  • 58
    Weinstein ND, Klein WM. Unrealistic optimism: present and future. J Soc Clin Psychol 1996; 15:18.
  • 59
    Helweg-Larsen M, Shepperd JA. Do moderators of the optimistic bias affect personal or target risk estimates? A review of the literature. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2001; 5:7495.
  • 60
    Rothman AJ, Klein WM, Weinstein ND. Absolute and relative biases in estimations of personal risk. J App Soc Psychol 1996; 26:12131236.
  • 61
    Weinstein ND. Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: conclusions from a community-wide sample. J Behav Med 1987; 10:481500.
  • 62
    Harris P. Sufficient grounds for optimism? The relationship between perceived controllability and optimistic bias. J Soc Clin Psychol 1996; 15:952.
  • 63
    Weinstein ND, Klein WM. Resistance of personal risk perceptions to debiasing interventions. Health Psychol 1995; 14:132140.
  • 64
    McCaul KD, O'Donnell SM. Naïve beliefs about breast cancer risk. Womens Health 1998; 4:93101.
  • 65
    Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Black WC, Welch HG. Women's perceptions of breast cancer risk: how you ask matters. Med Decis Making 1999; 19:221229.
  • 66
    Dillard AJ, McCaul KD, Kelso PD, Klein WMP. Resisting good news: reactions to breast cancer risk communication. Health Commun 2006; 19:115123.
  • 67
    Croyle RT, Sun Y, Louie DH. Psychological minimization of cholesterol test results: moderators of appraisal in college students and community residents. Health Psychol 1993; 12:503507.
  • 68
    Jemmott JB 3rd. Ditto PH, Croyle RT. Judging health status: effects of perceived prevalence and personal relevance. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986; 50:899905.
  • 69
    Sherman DAK, Nelson LD, Steele CM. Do messages about health risks threaten the self? Increasing the acceptance of threatening health messages via self-affirmation. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2000; 26:10461058.
  • 70
    Harris PR, Napper L. Self-affirmation and the biased processing of threatening health-risk information. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2005; 31:12501263.
  • 71
    Kunda Z. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol Bull 1990; 108:480498.
  • 72
    Bastardi A, Shafir E. On the pursuit and misuse of useless information. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998; 75:1932.
  • 73
    Redelmeier DA, Shafir E, Aujla PS. The beguiling pursuit of more information. Med Decis Making 2001; 21:376381.
  • 74
    Simonson I. Choice based on reasons: the case of attraction and compromise effects. J Consum Res 1989; 16:158174.
  • 75
    Schwartz JA, Chapman GB. Are more options always better? The attraction effect in physicians' decisions about medications. Med Decis Making 1999; 19:315323.
  • 76
    Shafir E. Choosing versus rejecting: why some options are both better and worse than others. Mem Cognit 1993; 21:546556.
  • 77
    Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979; 47:263291.
  • 78
    Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981; 211:453458.
  • 79
    Rothman AJ, Salovey P. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. Psychol Bull 1997; 121:319.
  • 80
    Rothman AJ, Martino SC, Bedell BT, et al. The systematic influence of gain- and loss-framed messages on interest in and use of different types of health behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1999; 25:13551369.
  • 81
    Banks SM, Salovey P, Greener S, et al. The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psychol 1995; 14:178184.
  • 82
    Hay JL, Buckley TR, Ostroff JS. The role of cancer worry in cancer screening: a theoretical and empirical overview of the literature. Psychooncology 2005; 14:517534.
  • 83
    Rothman AJ, Salovey P, Antone C, et al. The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. J Exp Soc Psychol 1993; 29:408433.
  • 84
    Arkes HR, Blumer C. The psychology of sunk cost. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1985; 35:124140.
  • 85
    Bornstein BH, Emler AC, Chapman GB. Rationality in medical treatment decisions: is there a sunk-cost effect? Soc Sci Med 1999; 49:215222.
  • 86
    Miller DT, Turnbull W. The counterfactual fallacy: confusing what might have been with what ought to have been. Soc Justice Res 1990; 4:119.
  • 87
    Miller DT, Taylor B, Buck ML. Gender gaps: who needs to be explained? J Pers Soc Psychol 1991; 61:512.
  • 88
    Miller DT, Taylor BR. Counterfactual thought, regret, and superstition: how to avoid kicking yourself, in GilovichT, GriffinD, KahnemanD (eds). Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
  • 89
    Ritov I, Baron J. Reluctance to vaccinate: omission bias and ambiguity. J Behav Decis Making 1990; 3:263277.
  • 90
    Miller DT, Gunasegaram S. Temporal order and the perceived mutability of events: implications for blame assignment. J Pers Soc Psychol 1990; 59:11111118.
  • 91
    Richard R, van der Pligt J, de Vries N. Anticipated regret and time perspective: changing sexual risk-taking behavior. J Behav Decis Making 1996; 9:185199.
  • 92
    Clark JA, Wray NP, Ashton CM. Living with treatment decisions: regrets and quality of life among men treated for metastatic prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19:7280.
  • 93
    Schwarzer R, Fuchs R. Self-efficacy and health behaviours, in ConnerM, NormanP (eds). Predicting Health Behavior. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press; 2001:163196.
  • 94
    Godin G, Kok G. The theory of planned behavior: a review of its applications to health-related behaviors. Am J Health Promot 1996; 11:8798.
  • 95
    Klein WM, Kunda Z. Exaggerated self-assessments and the preference for controllable risks. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1994; 59:410427.
  • 96
    Svenson O. Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers? Acta Psychol 1981; 47:143148.
  • 97
    Botti S, Iyengar S. The psychological pleasure and pain of choosing: when people prefer choosing at the cost of subsequent outcome satisfaction. J Pers Soc Psychol 2004; 87:312326.
  • 98
    Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat 1954; 7:117140.
  • 99
    Klein WM. Objective standards are not enough: affective, self-evaluative, and behavioral responses to social comparison information. J Pers Soc Psychol 1997; 72:763774.
  • 100
    Klein WMP. Self-prescriptive, perceived, and actual attention to comparative risk information. Psychol Health 2003; 18:625643.
  • 101
    Cranney M, Walley T. Same information, different decisions: the influence of evidence on the management of hypertension in the elderly. Br J Gen Pract 1996; 46:661663.
  • 102
    Klein WM, Weinstein ND. Social comparison and unrealistic optimism about personal risk, in BuunkBP, GibbonsFX (eds). Health, Coping, and Well-being: Perspectives from Social Comparison Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1997:2561.
  • 103
    Blalock SJ, DeVellis BM, Afifi RA, Sandler RS. Risk perceptions and participation in colorectal cancer screening. Health Psychol 1990; 9:792806.
  • 104
    Lipkus IM, Klein WMP, Skinner CS, Rimer BK. Breast cancer risk perceptions and breast cancer worry: what predicts what? J Risk Res 2005; 8:439452.
  • 105
    McCaul KD, Canevello AB, Mathwig JL, Klein WMP. Risk communication and worry about breast cancer. Psychol Health Med 2003; 8:379389.
  • 106
    Lipkus IM, Klein WMP. Effects of communicating social comparison information on risk perceptions for colorectal cancer. J Health Commun 2006; 11:391407.
  • 107
    Gibbons FX, Gerrard M. Predicting young adults' health risk behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 1995; 69:505517.
  • 108
    Klein WM, Kunda Z. Maintaining self- serving social comparisons: biased reconstruction of one's past behaviors. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1993; 19:732739.
  • 109
    Perloff LS, Fetzer BK. Self-other judgments and perceived vulnerability to victimization. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986; 50:502510.
  • 110
    Gibbons FX, Buunk BP. Individual differences in social comparison: development of a scale of social comparison orientation. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999; 76:129142.
  • 111
    Gibbons FX, Lane DJ, Gerrard M, et al. Drinking and driving: a prospective assessment of the relation between risk cognitions and risk behavior. Risk Dec Policy 2002; 7:267283.
  • 112
    Shepperd JA, Findley-Klein C, Kwavnick KD, et al. Bracing for loss. J Pers Soc Psychol 2000; 78:620634.
  • 113
    Taylor KM, Shepperd JA. Bracing for the worst: severity, testing, and feedback timing as moderators of the optimistic bias. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1998; 24:915926.
  • 114
    Routledge C, Arndt J, Goldenberg JL. A time to tan: proximal and distal effects of mortality salience on sun exposure intentions. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2004; 30:13471358.
  • 115
    Johnson EJ, Tversky A. Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk. J Pers Soc Psychol 1983; 45:2031.
  • 116
    Lerner JS, Keltner D. Fear, anger, and risk. J Pers Soc Psychol 2001; 81:146159.
  • 117
    Lerman C, Lustbader E, Rimer B, et al. Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87:286292.
  • 118
    Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK, et al. Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening. Health Psychol 1991; 10:259267.
  • 119
    McCaul KD, Schroeder DM, Reid PA. Breast cancer worry and screening: some prospective data. Health Psychol 1996; 15:430433.
  • 120
    Finucane ML, Alhakami A, Slovic P, Johnson SM. The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. J Beh Dec Making 2000; 13:117.
  • 121
    Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull 2001; 127:267286.
  • 122
    Damasio AR. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York, NY: Avon Books; 1994.
  • 123
    Lipkus IM, Kuchibhatla M, McBride CM, et al. Relationships among breast cancer perceived absolute risk, comparative risk, and worries. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000; 9:973975.
  • 124
    Moser RP, McCaul KD, Peters E, et al. Risk and worry as predictors of cancer health-protective actions: data from the Health Interview National Trends Survey (HINTS). J Health Psychol 2007; 12:5365.
  • 125
    Blanton H, Axsom D, McClive KP, Price S. Pessimistic bias in comparative evaluations: a case of perceived vulnerability to the effects of negative life events. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2001; 27:16271636.
  • 126
    Gilbert DT, Pinel EC, Wilson TD, et al. Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998; 75:617638.
  • 127
    Smith AW, Baum A. The influence of psychological factors on restorative function in health and illness, in SulsJM, WallstonKA (eds). Social Psychological Foundations of Health and Illness. Boston, MA: Blackwell Publishing; 2003:431457.
  • 128
    Bower JE, Kemeny ME, Taylor SE, Fahey JL. Finding positive meaning and its association with natural killer cell cytotoxicity among participants in a bereavement-related disclosure intervention. Ann Behav Med 2003; 25:146155.
  • 129
    Loewenstein G. Hot-cold empathy gaps and medical decision making. Health Psychol 2005; 24(suppl):S49S56.
  • 130
    Fagerlin A, Ditto PH, Hawkins NA, et al. The use of advance directives in end-of-life decision making. Am Behav Sci 2002; 46:268283.
  • 131
    McFarland C, Ross M, DeCourville N. Women's theories of menstruation and biases in recall of menstrual symptoms. J Pers Soc Psychol 1989; 57:522531.
  • 132
    Peters E, Lipkus I, Diefenbach MA. The functions of affect in health communications and in the construction of health preferences. J Commun 2006; 56(suppl):S140S162.
  • 133
    Nabi RL. Exploring the framing effects of emotion: do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Communic Res 2003; 30:224284.
  • 134
    Schwarz N, Bless H, Bohner G. Mood and persuasion: affective states influence processing of persuasive communications. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 1991; 24:161199.
  • 135
    Heine SJ, Lehman DR. Cultural variation in unrealistic optimism: does the West feel more invulnerable than the East? J Pers Soc Psychol 1995; 68:595607.
  • 136
    Snibbe AC, Markus HR. You can't always get what you want: educational attainment, agency, and choice. J Pers Soc Psychol 2005; 88:703720.
  • 137
    Fong GT, Krantz DH, Nisbett RE. The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems. Cognit Psychol 1986; 18:253292.
  • 138
    Lehman D, Nisbett RE. A longitudinal study of the effects of undergraduate education on reasoning. Dev Psychol 1990; 26:952960.
  • 139
    Lehman D, Lempert RO, Nisbett RE. The effects of graduate training on reasoning: formal discipline and thinking about everyday life events. Am Psychol 1988; 43:431442.
  • 140
    Christensen C, Abbott AS. Team medical decision-making, in ChapmanGB, SonnenbergFA (eds). Decision Making in Health Care. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2000:267285.
  • 141
    Argote L, Devadas R, Melone N. The base-rate fallacy: contrasting processes and outcomes of group and individual judgment. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1990; 46:296310.
  • 142
    Larson JR, Jr, Christensen C, Abbott AS, Franz TM. Diagnosing groups: charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams. J Pers Soc Psychol 1996; 71:315330.
  • 143
    Waters EA, Weinstein ND, Colditz GA, Emmons K. Reducing aversion to side effects in preventive medical treatment decisions. J Exp Psychol Appl. In press.
  • 144
    Chao C, Studts JL, Abell T, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: how presentation of recurrence risk influences decision-making. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21:42994305.