This paper combines and expands on selected material first explored in Gandhi (2008) and Berry and Haile (2009). We have benefitted from helpful comments from Jean-Marc Robin, Don Brown, the referees, and participants in seminars at LSE, UCL, Wisconsin, Yale, the 2011 UCL workshop on “Consumer Behavior and Welfare Measurement,” and the 2011 “Econometrics of Demand” conference at MIT. Adam Kapor provided capable research assistance. Financial support from the National Science Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.
Connected Substitutes and Invertibility of Demand
Article first published online: 18 SEP 2013
© 2013 The Econometric Society
Volume 81, Issue 5, pages 2087–2111, September 2013
How to Cite
Berry, S., Gandhi, A. and Haile, P. (2013), Connected Substitutes and Invertibility of Demand. Econometrica, 81: 2087–2111. doi: 10.3982/ECTA10135
- Issue published online: 18 SEP 2013
- Article first published online: 18 SEP 2013
- Manuscript received June, 2011; final revision received March, 2013.
- global inverse;
- weak substitutes;
We consider the invertibility (injectivity) of a nonparametric nonseparable demand system. Invertibility of demand is important in several contexts, including identification of demand, estimation of demand, testing of revealed preference, and economic theory exploiting existence of an inverse demand function or (in an exchange economy) uniqueness of Walrasian equilibrium prices. We introduce the notion of “connected substitutes” and show that this structure is sufficient for invertibility. The connected substitutes conditions require weak substitution between all goods and sufficient strict substitution to necessitate treating them in a single demand system. The connected substitutes conditions have transparent economic interpretation, are easily checked, and are satisfied in many standard models. They need only hold under some transformation of demand and can accommodate many models in which goods are complements. They allow one to show invertibility without strict gross substitutes, functional form restrictions, smoothness assumptions, or strong domain restrictions. When the restriction to weak substitutes is maintained, our sufficient conditions are also “nearly necessary” for even local invertibility.