Matching With (Branch-of-Choice) Contracts at the United States Military Academy

Authors

  • Tayfun Sönmez,

    1. Dept. of Economics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, U.S.A.; sonmezt@bc.edu
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Tobias B. Switzer

    1. United States Air Force, 6th Special Operations Squadron, Hurlburt Field, FL 32544, U.S.A.; tobias.switzer@gmail.com
    Search for more papers by this author
    • We thank Péter Biró, Federico Echenique, John Hatfield, Fuhito Kojima, Scott Kominers, three anonymous referees, and seminar participants at Berkeley, Boston College, Chicago, Deakin, UNSW, 2011 NBER Market Design Workshop, ESAM 2012, GAMES 2012, Match-Up 2012, SAET 2012, and 2012 NSF/CEME Decentralization Conference for helpful comments.


Abstract

Branch selection is a key decision in a cadet's military career. Cadets at USMA can increase their branch priorities at a fraction of slots by extending their service agreement. This real-life matching problem fills an important gap in the market design literature, providing strong empirical legitimacy to a series of elegant theoretical works on matching with contracts. Although priorities fail a key substitutes condition, the agent-optimal stable mechanism is well defined, and in contrast to the current USMA mechanism it is fair, stable, strategy-proof, and respects improvements in cadet priorities. Adoption of this mechanism benefits cadets and the Army. This new application shows that the matching with contracts model is practically relevant beyond traditional domains that satisfy the substitutes condition.

Ancillary