Inefficient Investment Waves

Authors

  • Zhiguo He,

    1. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A.
    2. NBER
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Péter Kondor

    1. Dept. of Finance, London School of Economics, London, U.K.
    2. CEPR
    Search for more papers by this author
    • We are grateful to the editor, the referees, Ulf Axelson, Hans Gersbach, Arvind Krishnamurthy, Guido Lorenzoni, Semyon Malamud, John Moore, Tyler Muir, Martin Oehmke, Alp Simsek, Balazs Szentes, Jaume Ventura, Rob Vishny, and numerous seminar participants. We thank Miklós Farkas for excellent research assistance. Zhiguo He acknowledges the financial support from the Center for Research in Security Prices at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Péter Kondor acknowledges the financial support of the Paul Woolley Centre at the LSE and of the European Research Council (Starting Grant #336585).

Abstract

We show that firms' individually optimal liquidity management results in socially inefficient boom-and-bust patterns. Financially constrained firms decide on the level of their liquid resources facing cash-flow shocks and time-varying investment opportunities. Firms' liquidity management decisions generate simultaneous waves in aggregate cash holdings and investment, even if technology remains constant. These investment waves are not constrained efficient in general, because the social and private value of liquidity differs. The resulting pecuniary externality affects incentives differentially depending on the state of the economy, and often overinvestment occurs during booms and underinvestment occurs during recessions. In general, policies intended to mitigate underinvestment raise prices during recessions, making overinvestment during booms worse. However, a well-designed price-support policy will increase welfare in both booms and recessions.

Ancillary