Social Connections and Incentives in the Workplace: Evidence From Personnel Data

Authors

  • Oriana Bandiera,

    1. Dept. of Economics, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, U.K.; o.bandiera@lse.ac.uk
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Iwan Barankay,

    1. The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U.S.A.; barankay@wharton.upenn.edu
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Imran Rasul

    1. Dept. of Economics, University College London, Drayton House, 30 Gordon Street, London WC1E 6BT, U.K.; i.rasul@ucl.ac.uk
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Financial support from the ESRC is gratefully acknowledged. We thank a co-editor, three anonymous referees, Simon Burgess, Arnaud Chevalier, Paul Grout, Costas Meghir, Antonio Merlo, Paul Oyer, Torsten Persson, Canice Prendergast, Kathryn Shaw, David Stromberg, John Van Reenen, Fabrizio Zilibotti, and numerous seminar and conference participants for comments and suggestions that have helped improve the paper. Brandon R. Halcott provided excellent research assistance. We thank all those involved in providing the data. This paper has been screened to ensure no confidential information is revealed. All errors remain our own.


Abstract

We present evidence on the effect of social connections between workers and managers on productivity in the workplace. To evaluate whether the existence of social connections is beneficial to the firm's overall performance, we explore how the effects of social connections vary with the strength of managerial incentives and worker's ability. To do so, we combine panel data on individual worker's productivity from personnel records with a natural field experiment in which we engineered an exogenous change in managerial incentives, from fixed wages to bonuses based on the average productivity of the workers managed. We find that when managers are paid fixed wages, they favor workers to whom they are socially connected irrespective of the worker's ability, but when they are paid performance bonuses, they target their effort toward high ability workers irrespective of whether they are socially connected to them or not. Although social connections increase the performance of connected workers, we find that favoring connected workers is detrimental for the firm's overall performance.

Ancillary