I would like to thank Robert Moffitt for his guidance; the three anonymous referees for providing suggestions that tremendously improved the paper; the editor for valuable comments; Daniel Feenberg for providing assistance with the codes of the NBER TAXSIM model; Christopher Carroll, Jeffrey Grogger, Hidehiko Ichimura, Fedor Iskhakov, Michael Keane, Kai Liu, Stephen Shore, Matthew Shum, Tiemen Woutersen, and seminar participants of the Econometric Society Summer Meetings, CUHK, Fudan, HKU, Renmin, Tsinghua and UNSW for fruitful discussions. Huihao Yan and Yue Zhang provided excellent research assistance.
A Dynamic Model of Welfare Reform
Article first published online: 16 MAY 2013
© 2013 The Econometric Society
Volume 81, Issue 3, pages 941–1001, May 2013
How to Cite
Chan, M. K. (2013), A Dynamic Model of Welfare Reform. Econometrica, 81: 941–1001. doi: 10.3982/ECTA9075
- Issue published online: 16 MAY 2013
- Article first published online: 16 MAY 2013
- Manuscript received January, 2010; final revision received July, 2012.
- Welfare reform;
- female labor supply;
- multiple program participation;
- discrete choice dynamic programming;
- time limit
A dynamic structural model of labor supply, welfare participation, and food stamp participation is estimated using the 1992, 1993, and 1996 panels of the Survey of Income and Program Participation. Details of various policies including welfare time limits, work requirements, and Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) are incorporated formally in the budget constraint. Policy simulations reveal that the economy accounts for half of the increase in the labor supply of female heads of family between 1992 and 1999. A time limit results in a larger efficiency gain than a work requirement or a direct reduction in welfare benefits. A reform package can lead to both a reduction in the government expenditure and an improvement in utility. The EITC expansion results in a substantial efficiency gain among individuals with the lowest expected wage. These individuals are almost unaffected by the economic expansion, but their income and utility increase significantly under the reform package.